Matthew O'Connor wrote: > Michael Monnerie wrote: >> On Freitag, 15. Dezember 2006 09:22 Paul J Stevens wrote: >>> Presently, dbmail is highly US-ASCII centric. One of the goals for >>> 2.4 is to make it more UTF-8 oriented. >> >> Uhm, does that mean I'm going to have problems with my postgresql >> database created with encoding=UTF-8 ? > > I running PG 8.1 with a UTF-8 encoded DB, it was painful during the > 2.1 dev tree, but at this point everything works. Every once in > while I'll get a message that fails to deliver because of an invalid > UTF sequence, but that's very rare a this point. If fact I think > it's only an issue for characters in headers. > Based on my testing yesterday, it was an issue in headers.
I'm more concerned about the failure I saw a number of times yesterday with bad timestamp stuff (see bug 475). LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 512-248-2683 E-Mail: [email protected] US Mail: 430 Valona Loop, Round Rock, TX 78681-3893 _______________________________________________ DBmail mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
