On Tue, Oct 9, 2007, Anne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Paul J Stevens wrote: >> Anne wrote: >> >>> Paul, >>> >>> Can you please give more information about bug 508. What did you find? >>> I'm willing to post the problem on an avelsieve list. I guess they want >>> as much info as possible. >>> >> >> I didn't find anything, just that dbmail's behaviour is on target. >> >> Your own final remark seemed to confirm that: >> >> ''' >> So there's only a problem when the script is generated by Avelsieve. >> > That doesn't necessarily mean the problem must be caused by Avelsieve. > Who knows, maybe dbmail chokes on something valid created by > Avelsieve... :-) > >> ''' >> >> I dont use avelsieve myself. Isn't that project dead? >> > I'm actually using Squirrelmail 1.4.10a which uses Avelsieve: > This script has been automatically generated by avelsieve # (Sieve Mail > Filters Plugin for Squirrelmail)
Please post scripts that produce possibly questionable behavior. The only salient difference in scripts generated by Avelsieve is that they includes a PHP serialized array that encodes each action so that Avelsieve does not need to use a full sieve parser. Since support for # COMMENTS... is very good in libSieve, I need to actually see a script to be able to evaluate real behavioral differences. Aaron _______________________________________________ DBmail mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
