Spamassassin isn't even near that accuracy what you gain with dspam. I have both running, because spamassassin is more simple for users, but personally I run dspam and after month training it catch almost everything and most important thing is that it has not make any mistake so far, I mean mark any mail as spam when it wasn't.
Dspam problem is that it needs little more work until you get all out of it, but when you have trained it well it will give you VERY good accuracy. And I'm speaking now 99,9% accuracy. Thats something you never get with spamassassin. But this goes off topic, so I at least change subject.. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jorge Bastos > Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 11:45 PM > To: 'DBMail mailinglist' > Subject: RE: [Dbmail] dbmail-lmtpd eating cpu! > > I preffer spamassassin, works great, never had problems, no > need to change, and most of all, catch's about 90% of the > spam, and messages that were not spam but catght are very very rare. > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jani Partanen > Sent: quarta-feira, 31 de Outubro de 2007 21:21 > To: 'DBMail mailinglist' > Subject: RE: [Dbmail] dbmail-lmtpd eating cpu! > > It's very powerfull antispam solution. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jorge Bastos > > Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 11:14 AM > > To: 'DBMail mailinglist' > > Subject: RE: [Dbmail] dbmail-lmtpd eating cpu! > > > > Dspam? What is that? :P > > No, I don't use dspam. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Niki Guldbrand > > Sent: quarta-feira, 31 de Outubro de 2007 3:21 > > To: DBMail mailinglist > > Subject: RE: [Dbmail] dbmail-lmtpd eating cpu! > > > > Hi Jorge. > > > > > > On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 20:33 +0000, Jorge Bastos wrote: > > > Paul, > > > Check the files attached. > > > This is the message that caused this. > > > I have one file with the state of the message while it was > > in queue, > > > because of the message that it was giving, I "shoted" at it and > > > deleted it and voilá, it was really this message that was causing > > > lmtpd to > > eat the CPU. > > > Now, in wich circunstancies this happened... I really > have no idea. > > > I have postfix with clamsmtpd and spamd. > > > Tell me what you need to help on this. > > > I belive there's other guy with the same problem once in a while. > > > > > > Jorge > > > > If you look at the snippet below, doesn't that look like > the signature > > bug that is/was(?) in dspam ? > > Or am i totally off here ? > > > > ----- Snippet ----- > > MIME-Version: 1.0 > > Content-Type: multipart/mixed; > > boundary="--C3B11B941435CAC47D9BBFB287DA26D0" > > "" > > > > "" > > X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP > > > > "" > > > > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > > ---- Snippet End ---- > > > > > > Regards > > > > Niki Guldbrand > > > > _______________________________________________ > > DBmail mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > DBmail mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail > > _______________________________________________ > DBmail mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail > > _______________________________________________ DBmail mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
