On 04/10/2012 02:54 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> hm, should we not respect
>
> * Precedence: bulk
> * Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
>
> after
> http://git.dbmail.eu/paul/dbmail/commit/?id=7216ea4732dc0ad5eb66c76e378af3ea7a34ba4a
>
> in dbmail-autoreply?
Maybe we should ignore messages with Precedence: bulk as an additional
restriction.
>
> today/tonight i added both headers to our lib which generates
> newsletters and other automated messages - dbmail still sends
> a reply to such messages, i guess the intention of this
> headers in the above commit is to prevent other servers
> sending replies to us :-)
Don't use the To or Cc header for such messages. Use the envelope.
Or in PHP terms: never use 'mail' (which sucks for many reasons), but
use the Pear::Net_SMTP package.
--
________________________________________________________________
Paul J Stevens pjstevns @ gmail, twitter, skype, linkedin
* Premium Hosting Services and Web Application Consultancy *
www.nfg.nl/[email protected]/+31.85.877.99.97
________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
DBmail mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
