On 08/20/2013 02:16 PM, Thomas Raschbacher wrote:
>>> It lists version 0.9.9 ?
>>
>> The version is from mutils/mhash_config.h
>>
>> For FreeBSD I include the config.h a second time to get round this.
Nice trick. I'll do that as well.
> Maybe someone should tell mutils folks that it might not be the best
> idea to export VERSION
> in a library header? (I mean they could just use MHASH_VERSION)
Mhash is dead, as in un-maintained and abandoned. I think you should
take it up with the packager. For Debian it was fixed in-distro a long
time ago.
>
> Apart from that I think it would be best maybe to not use VERSION but
> rather change the name to DBMAIL_VERSION, since that would also prevent
> this problem occuring again at some later point when another library
> header exports this again. (I don't know how easy it is to change
> configure stuff to use DBMAIL_VERSION instead of VERSION, so you could
> just #define DBMAIL_VERSION VERSION right after the include to make it
> simple)
Sounds like a good idea.
> Or would it be ok/better to just include config.h *last* of all includes ?
Whatever works.
--
________________________________________________________________
Paul J Stevens pjstevns @ gmail, twitter, skype, linkedin
* Premium Hosting Services and Web Application Consultancy *
www.nfg.nl/[email protected]/+31.85.877.99.97
________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
DBmail mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
