Hi Paul, That was our idea (on the IRC channel) too.
Maybe it's better to add a default user and the user as I have now as "shared mailbox user" and set the permissions. Than you automaticly have an overall user that can access all boxes if needed. What do you think of that ? 2013/11/8 Paul J Stevens <[email protected]> > On 11/08/2013 05:40 PM, Matt . wrote: > > What can I check when an ACL is not applied at all ? > > > > is DBmail applying always or do I need to turn something like you need > > to do with sieve ? > > > Mmm, looking at the code. > > > Looks like owners always have full permission in terms of the ACL code. > You can set mailboxes read-only using the permission flag, but the acl > code is meant to grant access to *other* users than owner. > > Please test this feature (permission). I never use it myself, and don't > know how extensively this is used and/or tested by others. > > > -- > ________________________________________________________________ > Paul J Stevens pjstevns @ gmail, twitter, skype, linkedin > > * Premium Hosting Services and Web Application Consultancy * > > www.nfg.nl/[email protected]/+31.85.877.99.97 > ________________________________________________________________ > _______________________________________________ > DBmail mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail >
_______________________________________________ DBmail mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
