Reindl, I know what you're saying, but hey, 120GB SSD SATA3 for a SWAP scenario cost's for me 70,00€, and 16GB of physical RAM about 130,00€. I believe I'll have better performance with a dedicated SSD for swap of 120GB than more extra 16GB (I hope!).
Let's see!! > no because i refuse to find a valid reason for swap on a server > > yes, swap is faster on SSD, but that makes the overall situation not > better than proper configuration not needing swap > > if your server not is using swap most of the time it does not matter > how fast swap is at all, if it heavily starts using swap it goes down > in any case because page-faults, cache-faults and all the overhead of > swap out memory pages which are often accessed again causing other > pages to be swapped and sort after dead loaded agin in circles > > if you invest the same money for the SSD disk in RAM and raise the > innodb_buffer you gain *a lot* of more performance _______________________________________________ DBmail mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
