Hi Guys,
I asked before about "manual spotting" and as follow up to that, I was
wondering what would be the most effective placement of a "Spot" to be
disambiguated within a context for Spotlight to make the most accurate
disambiguation, since spotlight is looking at the context of a word before
it is annotated. Is it in the beginning of a context, middle or end?
For example on the same case:
*(1) Windows. For the same $1,299 you could spend on this 21.5-inch Apple
iMac, you can buy a 23-inch or even a 27-inch (2) Windows-based all-in-one,
and with more robust features.*
*Yes, for better or for worse, those other PCs have (3) Windows 8. They
also have touch screens and optical drives, features that Apple has deemed
inessential for a desktop. You might agree with Apple. You might also
accept Apple's hallmark design excellence and display quality as worthy
substitutions. You might even need or want a particular function of OS X
that you can't get in a (4) Windows PC.*
So for example I chose to manually annotate *(3)*, will it give me a higher
chance of having a correct disambiguation of *"Windows"* compared to
picking *(1)*,* (2)*, or *(4)*?
Essentially what I'm looking to get to is how much context do I need to
feed spotlight (in my case since I wanted a manual way to spot words) for
it to be accurate.
Thanks,
Chux
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A LEADER in The Forrester
Wave(TM): Endpoint Security, Q1 2013 and "remains a good choice" in the
endpoint security space. For insight on selecting the right partner to
tackle endpoint security challenges, access the full report.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/symantec-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Dbp-spotlight-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbp-spotlight-users
