Hi,

looking into the log I see many entries about coreference resolution.

Googling for it I have found this

https://github.com/dbpedia-spotlight/dbpedia-spotlight/pull/229

/The candidates repetition (issue #136) is produced by the coreference resolution filter at rest/candidates.//
//
//For now, we disabled the filter by setting setting coreferenceResolution to false, ignoring user's configuration./

Regards
Reinhard

On 22.02.2014 20:09, reinhard schwab wrote:
Hi,

I have installed DBpedia Spotlight locally,
and start the server as given in the documentation using the german model.

But somehow I often get the same candidates in many cases, and only
sometimes,
I get different candidates.
This happens in the same request.

I have tested with the text in the demo.

{"annotation": {
    "@text": "Erstmals 1237 urkundlich erwähnt, war Berlin im Verlauf der
Geschichte und in verschiedenen Staatsformen Hauptstadt Brandenburgs,
Preußens und des Deutschen Reichs. Faktisch war der Ostteil der Stadt
Hauptstadt der Deutschen Demokratischen Republik. Seit der
Wiedervereinigung im Jahr 1990 ist Berlin gesamtdeutsche Hauptstadt mit
Sitz des Bundespräsidenten seit 1994, des Deutschen Bundestags seit 1999
sowie des Bundesrats seit 2000.",
    "surfaceForm": [
      {
        "@name": "Deutschen Bundestags",
        "@offset": "373",
        "resource": [
          {
            "@label": "Deutscher Bundestag",
            "@uri": "Deutscher_Bundestag",
            "@contextualScore": "0.9702934150865999",
            "@percentageOfSecondRank": "8.862095057454473E-6",
            "@support": "7005",
            "@priorScore": "1.7286381169516842E-4",
            "@finalScore": "0.9999911379825226",
            "@types": ""
          },
          {
            "@label": "Bundestag (Deutscher Bund)",
            "@uri": "Bundestag_(Deutscher_Bund)",
            "@contextualScore": "0.029113497062795292",
            "@percentageOfSecondRank": "0.0",
            "@support": "360",
            "@priorScore": "8.883793320522575E-6",
            "@finalScore": "8.862016521413187E-6",
            "@types": ""
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "@name": "Bundesrats",
        "@offset": "414",
        "resource": [
          {
            "@label": "Bundesrat (Deutschland)",
            "@uri": "Bundesrat_(Deutschland)",
            "@contextualScore": "0.886017419307129",
            "@percentageOfSecondRank": "0.4000000227871456",
            "@support": "1006",
            "@priorScore": "2.4825266890126973E-5",
            "@finalScore": "0.6952277913243906",
            "@types": ""
          },
          {
            "@label": "Bundesrat (Deutschland)",
            "@uri": "Bundesrat_(Deutschland)",
            "@contextualScore": "-1.0",
            "@percentageOfSecondRank": "0.4000000227871456",
"response.json" 657L, 23678C

First surface form has different candidates,
second surface form has always the same.
Same for surface form "Berlin", always same candidate.

Why?

Regards
Reinhard


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications
Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls.
Read the Whitepaper.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121054471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Dbp-spotlight-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbp-spotlight-users

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications
Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls.
Read the Whitepaper.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121054471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Dbp-spotlight-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbp-spotlight-users

Reply via email to