Hi Kasun, On 5/29/13 6:03 PM, kasun perera wrote: > I first thought Aleksander's classification work is not integrated in to > dbpedia? but it seems it is already done? No, it doesn't seem so. If you look at the Warsaw example [1], there's no OpenCyc type information [2] yet. This also applies to the live instance [3]. > > Also I have included the sources for type inferences that Aleksander has > mentioned as proposal comments in below document, hoping that we could > use it as a reference. > https://docs.google.com/document/d/19iAwQzfXtkAiAUE0w4PKAZF1jGkKyRZYZoyEIEfhGws/edit?usp=sharing OK very good, but please keep all the documents in one place, i.e. your Wiki progress page. Thanks. > > Cheers!
[1] http://dbpedia.org/resource/Warsaw [2] http://sw.opencyc.org/concept/Mx4rvVjylZwpEbGdrcN5Y29ycA [3] http://live.dbpedia.org/resource/Warsaw -- Marco Fossati http://about.me/marco.fossati Twitter: @hjfocs Skype: hell_j ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Introducing AppDynamics Lite, a free troubleshooting tool for Java/.NET Get 100% visibility into your production application - at no cost. Code-level diagnostics for performance bottlenecks with <2% overhead Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_ap1 _______________________________________________ Dbpedia-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-developers
