Hi Kasun, What you are about to do is a straightforward warm-up task, which will be useful for the next DBpedia release. You should only add the datasets provided by Alessio to the dbpedia-links repo. You can leave the datasets structure as it is. Basically, you just have to comply with the repo structure (please have a look at the repo README). That's it!
Cheers, On 6/19/13 1:38 PM, kasun perera wrote: > So these entity types are a new set separated in to languages. > I can see these triples are following format > <http://be.dbpedia.org/resource/Паўночная_Ірландыя > <http://be.dbpedia.org/resource/%D0%9F%D0%B0%D1%9E%D0%BD%D0%BE%D1%87%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%86%D1%80%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B4%D1%8B%D1%8F>> > <http://airpedia.org/ontology/type_with_conf#10> > <http://dbpedia.org/ontology/Place> > > So i'm going to import this in to dbpedia as follows; can someone > confirm whether i'm right? > <http://be.dbpedia.org/resource/Паўночная_Ірландыя > <http://be.dbpedia.org/resource/%D0%9F%D0%B0%D1%9E%D0%BD%D0%BE%D1%87%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%86%D1%80%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B4%D1%8B%D1%8F>> > <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type> > <http://dbpedia.org/ontology/Place> > > > type_with_conf#10 means accuracy around 100% right? So is it a good idea > to import only entries having config#10 or just import all without > worrying about it? > > > On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 9:19 PM, Alessio Palmero Aprosio <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Dear Kasun, > on the web page > http://www.airpedia.org/download/dbpedia-entity-types-in-31-languages/ > you can find the classes in 31 languages. > The type is set to http://airpedia.org/ontology/type_with_conf#X , > so you can import the triples into DBpedia without conflicts. > > In the next days, the Italian DBpedia team will release a new > extraction (based on DBpedia 3.8) with these triple in it. The > format in this case is slightly different: I'll write about it in > the next e-mail. > > Let me know if you have troubles. > > Best, > Alessio > > Il 18/06/13 03:10, kasun perera ha scritto: >> I started working on integrating Airpedia types to Dbpedia-links. >> >> As Marco mentioned previously, these are the 3 data-sets that I >> can use and I need to analyze what is the best data set that to be >> integrated in to the Dbpedia. >> <http://airpedia.org/extraction/10-all> >> extracted using classifier with all kernels and the bottom-to-top >> strategy. >> <http://airpedia.org/extraction/10-all-top> >> extracted using classifier with all kernels and the top-to-bottom >> strategy >> <http://airpedia.org/extraction/10-tpl> >> extracted using classifier with the sole template kernel and the >> bottom-to-top strategy >> >> In Alessio et. al. ESWC paper, I can see it has already done some >> tests to measure precision and recall of these classifications. >> Can I use those results to select best Airpedia data-set for >> dbpedia? or do I need to test with another data set(the ones >> Aleksander mentioned) to measure precision and recall? >> >> Thanks >> -- >> Regards >> >> Kasun Perera >> > > > > > -- > Regards > > Kasun Perera > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: > > Build for Windows Store. > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > Dbpedia-developers mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-developers > -- Marco Fossati http://about.me/marco.fossati Twitter: @hjfocs Skype: hell_j ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Dbpedia-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-developers
