Hi Fred, hmm I think in this case I prefer a consistent order - that way, the configurations are grouped by platform, which especially useful when you want to differentiate "spoc, posc, opsc" from "spoc, posc, ospc" :)
Thanks, Christian On Jan 16, 2008, at 3:38 PM, Frederick Giasson wrote: > Hi again >>> you're right - as Virtuoso is no longer an outlier, there's no >>> need for log scales anymore :) I updated the charts now. >>> > > Also, another idea (not sure it will be better that way thought): > > > Why not sorting the horizontal columns on time basis instead of > "group of names". > > > By this I mean: the better results at top, and the worse (the longer > slide) at the bottom. It will be even better, and will gives some > sense of "grading" to the graph from top to bottom. > > > Could deserves a test; dunno. > > > Take care, > > > Fred > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Dbpedia-discussion mailing list Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
