Richard > Saying that the “subject” of the person “Tim Berners-Lee” is “History > of the Internet” is a bit of a stretch. Think about TBL as a (living) document, and you'll see it another way. > > My problem is not with the term “resource”, but with the term > “subject”. I don't doubt that DC properties, in general, are > applicable to all kinds of resources. But some sorts of resources > don't really have subjects. Why not? What is the fundamental difference between : On the subject 'History of Internet', see 'http://www.isoc.org/internet/history/brief.shtml' On the subject 'History of Internet', see 'http://dbpedia.org/resource/Tim_Berners-Lee'
None of those assertions says how you will *use* those resources : read the story, follow the link, or ask/write/phone TBL himself if you can ... They both say that the resource is relevant to the subject. Bernard <http://mondeca.wordpress.com/> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Dbpedia-discussion mailing list Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
