Hi Martin,
Do you encounter this limit executing the same or similar query
directly using the SPARQL Query page of the DBpedia SPARQL endpoint at:
http://dbpedia.org/sparql
If it does then please provide a sample query we can run against the
end point to be looked into.
Best Regards
Hugh Williams
Professional Services
OpenLink Software
On 14 May 2008, at 09:16, Martin Becker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm querying the DBpedia SPARQL endpoint using TopBraid Composer.
> Since the amount of data I'm fetching is quite big, I use an offset
> value to limit the output. This works quite well up to an offset
> value of 9000 in my SPARQL query.
>
> ...
> ORDER BY ?name
> LIMIT 1000
> OFFSET 9000
>
> This is the last value where I get any result. When I enter an
> offset value of 9001, no triples are fetched anymore. This is quite
> annoying, for when I don't use an offset, TBC/Eclipse collapses
> under the sheer amount of data that is being returned (> 40000).
>
> So my question is: Do you have an internal limit for the offset
> value configured? And if so, is there a workaround available to get
> queries working that include a higher offset value?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Martin
>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
