Dear All, 1) Is there any classification (groups.. etc) of those errors?
2) Should we start looking for some kind of "semantic errors" in near future? Best regards, Vladimir 2010/4/15 Richard Cyganiak <[email protected]>: > I stumbled upon this on Andy Seaborne's Twitter. Might be useful to > stomp out a bug or two. It's a log of the results of parsing the > DBpedia dumps with a pretty strict N-Triples parser: > http://www.openjena.org/~afs/DBPedia35-parse-log-2010-04-15.txt > > ~25k errors, which is not too bad for a 100M+ dataset. > > Best, > Richard > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev > _______________________________________________ > Dbpedia-discussion mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion > -- С уважением, Владимир Иванов -------------------------------------------------- Лаборатория математической и компьютерной лингвистики НИИММ им. Н.Г. Чеботарева - cll.niimm.ksu.ru Казанский (Приволжский) федеральный университет ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Dbpedia-discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
