Hi again,

you are right, the range of the censusYear property should be xsd:gYear.

To the comment problem i only can say that here: 
http://mappings.dbpedia.org/index.php/Mapping:Infobox_broadcast 
the "<!--" comment works for more than one property. Maybe you can try it this 
way:
<!-- 
some property
another property
-->

cheers,
paul

-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 12:42:43 +0200
> Von: Bastian Gorholt <[email protected]>
> An: [email protected]
> Betreff: [Dbpedia-discussion] Wrong range type of censusYear property?

> Hi,
> 
> the range of the censusYear property inside the dbpedia ontology seems
> to be of a wrong data type. In the current state the type is
> "xsd:date" (have a look:
> http://mappings.dbpedia.org/index.php/OntologyProperty:CensusYear).
> According to http://www.w3schools.com/Schema/schema_dtypes_date.asp a
> date is specified in the form:
> YYYY-MM-DD
> where ALL components are required. This means that one has to state a
> complete date in order to make use of censusYear. That seems to be a
> contradiction, doesn't it?
> 
> Cheers,
> Bastian
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Create and publish websites with WebMatrix
> Use the most popular FREE web apps or write code yourself; 
> WebMatrix provides all the features you need to develop and 
> publish your website. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-webmatrix-sf
> _______________________________________________
> Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Create and publish websites with WebMatrix
Use the most popular FREE web apps or write code yourself; 
WebMatrix provides all the features you need to develop and 
publish your website. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-webmatrix-sf
_______________________________________________
Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion

Reply via email to