Hi,

An idea of ​​what I do wrongly? (see my previous mail below)

Best.

Julien.

From: Julien Plu <julien....@redaction-developpez.com>
Date: 2013/4/20
Subject: Problem with extracted data
To: "dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net" <
dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net>


Hi,

After to have imported the extracted data into my virtuoso server I could
see that I had some strange data. By example all my URI start with "
http://dbpedia.org"; and not with "http://fr.dbpedia.org"; and I don't have
the "prop-fr" properties too, whereas I put "fr" in all the extraction
properties file.

I could see too, if I compare the data from the http://fr.dbpedia.org and
mine they are not the same. By example if you compare these two sparql
results :

mine :
http://data.lirmm.fr:8890/sparql?default-graph-uri=&query=select+distinct+*+where+%7B%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FToulouse%3E+%3Fp+%3Fo%7D&should-sponge=&format=text%2Fhtml&timeout=0&debug=on

fr.dbpedia.org :
http://fr.dbpedia.org/sparql?default-graph-uri=&query=select+distinct+*+where+%7B%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Ffr.dbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FToulouse%3E+%3Fp+%3Fo%7D&format=text%2Fhtml&timeout=0&debug=on

In mine, I don't have the "http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#sameAs"; or "
http://fr.dbpedia.org/property/population"; properties among many others.

In attachment my extraction property file.

What I did wrong ?

Best.

Julien.

Attachment: extraction.default.properties
Description: Binary data

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Precog is a next-generation analytics platform capable of advanced
analytics on semi-structured data. The platform includes APIs for building
apps and a phenomenal toolset for data science. Developers can use
our toolset for easy data analysis & visualization. Get a free account!
http://www2.precog.com/precogplatform/slashdotnewsletter
_______________________________________________
Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion

Reply via email to