There are a few other infoboxes that are not named "Infobox ..."
listed here: http://mappings.dbpedia.org/index.php/Special:AllPages/Mapping_en:
(The URL ends with a ":" colon.)

But if a number +/- 10% is OK for you, they probably don't matter.

JC

On 2 August 2013 01:02, Andy Mabbett <a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk> wrote:
> On 1 August 2013 20:38, Heiko Paulheim <he...@informatik.uni-mannheim.de> 
> wrote:
>> a rough answer can be given using the following SPARQL query:
>> select count(distinct ?x) where {?x dbpprop:wikiPageUsesTemplate ?t .
>> FILTER(REGEX(?t,"^http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Infobox";))}
>>
>> which returns around 1.9 Mio infoboxes (without "distinct"), and 1.1 Mio
>> pages with at least one infobox (with "distinct") (thanks Tom for pointing
>> out that difference).
>>
>> However, I am not sure how many infoboxes do actually follow that naming
>> convention.
>
> [Apologies to  Heiko Paulheim for sending an earlier reply direct]
>
> Thank you, all. The former figure tallies roughly with my estimate on
> Wikipedia, of "over 1,951,000" excluding the further 227,000+ using
> Template:Taxobox.
>
> There are also over 20,000 examples using Template:Geobox and a few
> less-widely used templates not yet renamed.
>
> I'm surprised that there are so many aritcles with two more more
> infoboxes (assuming few have more than two, the number would be about
> 400,000).
>
> --
> Andy Mabbett
> @pigsonthewing
> http://pigsonthewing.org.uk
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Get your SQL database under version control now!
> Version control is standard for application code, but databases havent
> caught up. So what steps can you take to put your SQL databases under
> version control? Why should you start doing it? Read more to find out.
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=49501711&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
> Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get your SQL database under version control now!
Version control is standard for application code, but databases havent 
caught up. So what steps can you take to put your SQL databases under 
version control? Why should you start doing it? Read more to find out.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=49501711&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion

Reply via email to