Thx for the quick answer. SimpleWikiParser is fine. I just noticed that it
does not remove '' or '''. Is that on purpose?

thx,
Karsten


On 4 December 2013 17:01, Dimitris Kontokostas <jimk...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Karsten,
>
> DBpedia 3.9 used only SimpleWikiParser but is a stable branch. If you just
> want SimpleWikiParser it should be fine calling it directly
> You can switch to master branch (4.0-SNAPSHOT) where we (re)support
> WikiParser.getInstance("simple") but might get into some bumps ;)
>
> Best,
> Dimitris
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Karsten Jeschkies <jes...@web.de> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I tried to use the wikiparser and had the following:
>>
>> With
>> val parer = WikiParser.getInstance("simple")
>>
>> and running it with sbt I was told, that WikiParser could not be found.
>>
>> With
>> val parser = new WikiParserWrapper("simple")
>>
>> I had the error: NoSuchFunction for page.format.
>>
>> With
>> val parser = new SimpleWikiParser()
>>
>> everything works fine.
>>
>> Any ideas what's wrong?
>>
>> thx,
>> Karsten
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Sponsored by Intel(R) XDK
>> Develop, test and display web and hybrid apps with a single code base.
>> Download it for free now!
>>
>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=111408631&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
>> Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Kontokostas Dimitris
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsored by Intel(R) XDK 
Develop, test and display web and hybrid apps with a single code base.
Download it for free now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=111408631&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion

Reply via email to