This simple query on the sparql endpoint http://lod.openlinksw.com/sparql:
SELECT * WHERE {
?s a <http://dbpedia.org/ontology/Film>
}
ORDER BY ?s
LIMIT 5
OFFSET 1
returns 4 results instead of 5, because of the offset. It works as
expected on http://dbpedia.org/sparql.
If I remove the ORDER BY clause, it seems it works, but the SPARQL
specification [1] says:
"Using LIMIT and OFFSET to select different subsets of the query
solutions will not be useful unless the order is made predictable by
using ORDER BY."
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/#modOffset
Regards,
Roberto
--
Roberto Mirizzi
PhD, Software Systems Development Engineer
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion & Make the Move to Perforce.
With Perforce, you get hassle-free workflows. Merge that actually works.
Faster operations. Version large binaries. Built-in WAN optimization and the
freedom to use Git, Perforce or both. Make the move to Perforce.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=122218951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
