On 4/10/14 4:03 PM, Patel-Schneider, Peter wrote:
Well, producing a new ontology is work, and it would be nice that this work has 
an effect.  This is why I was wondering who else was interested in improving 
the ontology.

I would hope the answer is: everyone that uses DBpedia .


This is a classic crowd-sourcing affair. It is going to require contributions from a myriad of participant profiles. The process will be iterative with no final completion date, since that's an contradictory goal :-)

--

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen 
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen





Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Put Bad Developers to Shame
Dominate Development with Jenkins Continuous Integration
Continuously Automate Build, Test & Deployment 
Start a new project now. Try Jenkins in the cloud.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/13600_Cloudbees
_______________________________________________
Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion

Reply via email to