On 4/15/14 1:06 AM, Dimitris Kontokostas wrote:
Kingsley's approach is one way to go but I think we should focus on fixing the ontology in the source, which is the mappings wiki. The German chapter is working on ways to automatically import axioms in the mappings wiki, so of course this is an option too.I think you already pointed out most of your suggested changes so we can start working on these. [1]Cheers, Dimitris[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net/msg05923.html
We should use this episode to make a clearer guidelines for evolving DBpedia. Options:
1. In the source -- via mapping Wiki2. Out side the source -- via RDF documents derived from the DBpedia data in question 3. A bit of both -- in situations where the changes have a deeper philosophical bent.
What I glean from this episode is that crowd-sourcing options for evolving the DBpedia ontology are not as clear as we generally assume, which ultimately leads to misconceptions etc..
-- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field, this first edition is now available. Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/NeoTech
_______________________________________________ Dbpedia-discussion mailing list Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
