Hi AfriNIC staff, since when is the 'e-mail:' attribute for 'person' objects mandatory?
I just found nic-hdl: SE1-AFRINIC that does not have an email. It's got a GENERATED maintainer, and I'm also wondering how these new maintainer credentials were communicated to the "person". Yes, I don't want to rely on 'changed:' attributes. Staff: How many 'person' objects don't have an 'e-mail:' attribute ? [slowly getting to another issue....] Why did I get to check this person object at all....? Because in a domain object it is tech-c: SE1-AFRINIC zone-c: SE1-AFRINIC Also, the domain object is since "2020-02-02 02:02" ( nice time stamp!! ;-) ) marked as all 'nserver' being *lame*. So when is it meant to get deleted? I hope we're not waiting for the tech-c or zone-c to respond to the email, which we could not send, because the 'person' doesn't have an email address? But what really got me to check the domain object: domain: 0.1.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.1.0.0.8.f.3.4.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa yes, it's a bit long. a reverse DNS delegation for a /128 This is probably "legal". But: a) if disputable 'usefulness', and b) I see "tremendous' potential for growth in the DB - in a bad way All, Staff and WG: should creation of domain objects be limited to certain prefix sizes? Thanks, Frank _______________________________________________ DBWG mailing list [email protected] https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/dbwg
