Hi SM, On 12/21, S. Moonesamy wrote: > Dear Ben, > At 11:59 AM 18-12-2020, Ben Maddison via DBWG wrote: > > As discussed during the last meeting, we have created an org on GitHub > > for the WG, in order to provide a place to collaborate on documents (and > > perhaps at some stage even code). > > The material in the repository is licensed under CC0 [1]. I doubt that code > would fit under that license. > You're quite correct. I chose that license *because* it is appropriate for non-code content in the public domain.
I do not expect there ever to be code in the 'meetings' repo. If we have other repos that do contain code, a different license would be appropriate. My personal preference is usually MIT, but we can have that conversation when it arises. Cheers, Ben
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ DBWG mailing list [email protected] https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/dbwg
