Dear DBWG, Please see below (inline)...
Le lundi 1 mars 2021, Simon Seruyinda <[email protected]> a écrit : > Hi Sylvain, > > Thanks for your input. Hi Simon, Thanks for your email, brother. > > > On 28 Feb 2021, at 17:55, Sylvain Baya <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > [...] > > > > > > > Org-type Status Descriptions > > org-type can have one of these values: > > [...] > > o 'CLOSED' > > This represents organisations that were at one point an active AFRINIC > > resource or associate member but no longer holds an active agreement > > with AFRINIC. (No applicable use case in AFRINIC for now but to be put > > to use soon). > > > > Hi Simon, > > Please explain the coming/announced usecase… > > > I didn’t find any reference to this in the shared document. Kindly shed > more light. ...please see above quoted and into parenthesis. That's the piece on which i wanted you to share more details ;-) > > > > ...why not think of it as of a case for a business suddenly closed... > > maybe it could help to protect INRs :-/ > > > > Very true. We are considering using it for this purpose. Noted. > > > > o 'INACTIVE-MEMBER' > > No applicable use case in AFRINIC (can be removed) > > > > > > # This class represents a resource member who is not in good standing. > > > > :-/ > > > > ...i think it could be a possibility to consider...after a given > $period1 the status > > of a resource member can change to 'INACTIVE-MEMBER', and can keep > > it during a $period2, time to come and pay before being rescued to an > > appropriate status, > > before AfriNIC reclaim allocated/assigned resources. > > > > idk if it really makes sense :-/ > > > > It does. Though I think this may be more applicable to the org billing > status as opposed to the org type. For example for an org of type LIR or > EU, it still remains so whether in good standing or not and the INRs will > still be actively used by same org until they are reclaimed. ...i agree, given your explanation. Maybe the others will want to share their PoV :-/ > > > > o 'NON-REGISTRY' > > No applicable use case in AFRINIC (can be removed) > > o 'OTHER' > > These organisations can be created by any person on the AFRINIC WHOIS > > database for the purpose of sub-allocation, but does not represent an > > [...] > > ...i don't see 'NIR' [1], IXP' and 'LEGACY-HOLDER' / 'LRH' > > > > If anyone is interested: > > > > ~°~ > > • NIR > > National Internet Registry can be seen as a ccLIR. > > This class represents all LIRs which serve inside > > a single, clearly-defined, country's boundaries. > > • IXP > > This class of objects represents an Internet eXchange Point. > > Its objects can be created only by AfriNIC, based > > on data collected during the registration of the entity in charge of an > IXP. > > • LEGACY-HOLDER > > This represents any Orgs with Legacy Resources in > > AfriNIC service region. An object can be created > > only by AfriNIC, after a deep investigation. > > • LRH > > {LRH = LEGACY RESOURCE HOLDER. Same as LEGACY-HOLDER} > > ~•~ > > > > ...btw, do we have NIRs in AfriNIC service region? > > > I don’t think so. > ...isn't NIR an interesting registry model to promote? Thanks & Blessed monday! Shalom, --sb. > > > > Thanks & Blessings! > > __ > > [1]: <https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Internet_registry> > > > > [...] > > > > -- -- Best Regards ! __ baya.sylvain[AT cmNOG DOT cm]|<www.cmnog.cm/dokuwiki> Subscribe to Mailing List: <lists.cmnog.cm/mailman/listinfo/cmnog/> __ #LASAINTEBIBLE|#Romains15:33«Que LE #DIEU de #Paix soit avec vous tous! #Amen!» #MaPrière est que tu naisses de nouveau. #Chrétiennement «Comme une biche soupire après des courants d’eau, ainsi mon âme soupire après TOI, ô DIEU!»(#Psaumes42:2)
_______________________________________________ DBWG mailing list [email protected] https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/dbwg
