> From: Gary Mills > I had a complaint from a user that obvious spam was getting through
> When I checked the DCC log, it was a typical multipart/alternative > MIME message with a text/plain and a text/html portion. Why would > there be no Fuz1 and Fuz2 checksums in this case? Could they be > using funny MIME headers? Here's how they look: This problem turned out to be a very old bug. The states of the MIME boundary strings matchers were not being sufficiently cleared at the starts of MIME parts. When the previous mail message handled by a dccm or dccifd thread had broken MIME encapsulation, the MIME boundaries of the next message would might not be matched. I guess I must stop fighting to improve FreeBSD DCC server performance and push out a release in the next few days. (Much other activity on a system can reduce the number of requests attracted by a public DCC server from more than 30 million per day to fewer than 3 million. FreeBSD 5.* - 6.* has some lame page locking. As far as I can tell, all other UNIX-like implementations of mmap() are worse.) Vernon Schryver [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ DCC mailing list [email protected] http://www.rhyolite.com/mailman/listinfo/dcc
