[DCCP]: Remove duplicate test for CloseReq This removes a redundant test for unexpected packet types. In dccp_rcv_state_process it is tested twice whether a DCCP-server has received a CloseReq (Step 7):
* first in the combined if-statement, * then in the call to dccp_rcv_closereq(). The latter is necesssary since dccp_rcv_closereq() is also called from __dccp_rcv_established(). This patch removes the duplicate test. Signed-off-by: Gerrit Renker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- net/dccp/input.c | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) --- a/net/dccp/input.c +++ b/net/dccp/input.c @@ -616,16 +616,14 @@ int dccp_rcv_state_process(struct sock * return 0; /* * Step 7: Check for unexpected packet types - * If (S.is_server and P.type == CloseReq) - * or (S.is_server and P.type == Response) + * If (S.is_server and P.type == Response) * or (S.is_client and P.type == Request) * or (S.state == RESPOND and P.type == Data), * Send Sync packet acknowledging P.seqno * Drop packet and return */ } else if ((dp->dccps_role != DCCP_ROLE_CLIENT && - (dh->dccph_type == DCCP_PKT_RESPONSE || - dh->dccph_type == DCCP_PKT_CLOSEREQ)) || + dh->dccph_type == DCCP_PKT_RESPONSE) || (dp->dccps_role == DCCP_ROLE_CLIENT && dh->dccph_type == DCCP_PKT_REQUEST) || (sk->sk_state == DCCP_RESPOND && - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html