| Thanks, I folded this into the reorganized RX history handling patch,
| together with reverting ccid3_hc_rx_packet_recv to very close to your
| original patch, with this changes:
|
| 1. no need to calculate the payload size for non data packets as this
| value won't be used.
| 2. Initialize hcrx->ccid3hcrx_bytes_recv with the payload size when
| hcrx->ccid3hcrx_state == TFRC_RSTATE_NO_DATA.
| 3. tfrc_rx_hist_duplicate() is only called when ccid3hcrx_state !=
| TFRC_RSTATE_NO_DATA, so it doesn't need to goto the done_receiving
| label (that was removed as this was its only use) as do_feedback
| would always be CCID3_FBACK_NONE and so the test would always fail
| and no feedback would be sent, so just return right there.
|
| Now it reads:
|
| static void ccid3_hc_rx_packet_recv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
| {
| struct ccid3_hc_rx_sock *hcrx = ccid3_hc_rx_sk(sk);
| enum ccid3_fback_type do_feedback = CCID3_FBACK_NONE;
| const u32 ndp = dccp_sk(sk)->dccps_options_received.dccpor_ndp;
| const bool is_data_packet = dccp_data_packet(skb);
|
| if (unlikely(hcrx->ccid3hcrx_state == TFRC_RSTATE_NO_DATA)) {
| if (is_data_packet) {
| const u32 payload = skb->len -
dccp_hdr(skb)->dccph_doff * 4;
| do_feedback = FBACK_INITIAL;
| ccid3_hc_rx_set_state(sk, TFRC_RSTATE_DATA);
| hcrx->ccid3hcrx_s =
| hcrx->ccid3hcrx_bytes_recv = payload_size;
==> Please see other email regarding bytes_recv, but I think you already got
that.
Maybe one could then write
hcrx->ccid3hcrx_s = skb->len - dccp_hdr(skb)->dccph_doff * 4;
| }
| goto update_records;
| }
|
| if (tfrc_rx_hist_duplicate(&hcrx->ccid3hcrx_hist, skb))
| return; /* done receiving */
|
| if (is_data_packet) {
| const u32 payload = skb->len - dccp_hdr(skb)->dccph_doff * 4;
| /*
| * Update moving-average of s and the sum of received payload
bytes
| */
| hcrx->ccid3hcrx_s = tfrc_ewma(hcrx->ccid3hcrx_s, payload_size,
9);
| hcrx->ccid3hcrx_bytes_recv += payload_size;
| }
|
| /*
| * Handle pending losses and otherwise check for new loss
| */
| if (tfrc_rx_hist_new_loss_indicated(&hcrx->ccid3hcrx_hist, skb, ndp))
| goto update_records;
|
| /*
| * Handle data packets: RTT sampling and monitoring p
| */
| if (unlikely(!is_data_packet))
| goto update_records;
|
| if (list_empty(&hcrx->ccid3hcrx_li_hist)) { /* no loss so far: p = 0 */
| const u32 sample =
tfrc_rx_hist_sample_rtt(&hcrx->ccid3hcrx_hist, skb);
==> If you like, you could add the original comment here that p=0 if no loss
occured, i.e.
/*
* Empty loss history: no loss so far, hence p stays 0.
* Sample RTT values, since an RTT estimate is required for the
* computation of p when the first loss occurs; RFC 3448, 6.3.1.
*/
| if (sample != 0)
| hcrx->ccid3hcrx_rtt = tfrc_ewma(hcrx->ccid3hcrx_rtt,
sample, 9);
| }
|
| /*
| * Check if the periodic once-per-RTT feedback is due; RFC 4342, 10.3
| */
| if (SUB16(dccp_hdr(skb)->dccph_ccval, hcrx->ccid3hcrx_last_counter) > 3)
| do_feedback = CCID3_FBACK_PERIODIC;
|
| update_records:
| tfrc_rx_hist_add_packet(&hcrx->ccid3hcrx_hist, skb, ndp);
|
==> here a jump label is missing. It is not needed by this patch and
above you have replaced it with a return + comment, but it is needed in a
later
patch: when a new loss event occurs, the control jumps to `done_receiving'
and
sends a feedback packet with type FBACK_PARAM_CHANGE.
done_receiving:
| if (do_feedback)
| ccid3_hc_rx_send_feedback(sk, skb, do_feedback);
| }
|
| Now to some questions and please bear with me as I haven't got to the
| patches after this:
|
| tfrc_rx_hist->loss_count as of now is a boolean, my understanding is
| that you are counting loss events, i.e. it doesn't matter in:
|
It is not a boolean, but uses a hidden trick which maybe should be commented:
* here and in the TCP world NDUPACK = 3
* hence the bitfield size for loss_count is 2 bits, which can express
at most 3 = NDUPACK (that is why it is declared as loss_count:2)
* the trick is that when the loss count increases beyond 3, it automatically
cycles back to 0 (although the code does not rely on that features
and does this explicitly);
* loss_start is the same
| /* any data packets missing between last reception and skb ? */
| int tfrc_rx_hist_new_loss_indicated(struct tfrc_rx_hist *h,
| const struct sk_buff *skb, u32 ndp)
| {
| int delta = dccp_delta_seqno(tfrc_rx_hist_last_rcv(h)->tfrchrx_seqno,
| DCCP_SKB_CB(skb)->dccpd_seq);
|
| if (delta > 1 && ndp < delta)
| tfrc_rx_hist_loss_indicated(h);
|
| return tfrc_rx_hist_loss_pending(h);
| }
|
| if (delta - ndp) is > 1, i.e. tfrc_rx_hist->loss_count only indicates
| that there was loss. But then in other parts of the code it assumes it
| can be more than 1:
In the above case the first loss is recorded in the history, which is
why loss_count is set to 1. Maybe it gets clearer in the next patch set,
which has three helper functions
__one_after_loss: to deal with the first lost packet
__two_after_loss: which deals when loss_count=2 packets are missing
__three_after_loss is already a new loss event (3=NDUPACK), so that
function only recycles the loss records
| /**
| * tfrc_rx_hist - RX history structure for TFRC-based protocols
| *
| * @ring: Packet history for RTT sampling and loss detection
| * @loss_count: Number of entries in circular history
| * @loss_start: Movable index (for loss detection)
| * @rtt_sample_prev: Used during RTT sampling, points to candidate entry
| */
| struct tfrc_rx_hist {
| struct tfrc_rx_hist_entry *ring[TFRC_NDUPACK + 1];
| u8 loss_count:2,
| loss_start:2;
| #define rtt_sample_prev loss_start
| };
|
| There is space for TFRC_NDUPACK + 1 possible values in loss_count (:2)
| and the comment says it is the number of entries in the circular
| history, and also:
|
| /* has the packet contained in skb been seen before? */
| int tfrc_rx_hist_duplicate(struct tfrc_rx_hist *h, struct sk_buff *skb)
| {
| const u64 seq = DCCP_SKB_CB(skb)->dccpd_seq;
| int i;
|
| if (dccp_delta_seqno(tfrc_rx_hist_loss_prev(h)->tfrchrx_seqno, seq) <=
0)
| return 1;
|
| for (i = 1; i <= h->loss_count; i++)
| if (tfrc_rx_hist_entry(h, i)->tfrchrx_seqno == seq)
| return 1;
|
| return 0;
| }
|
| With the current code this will always check just one entry, as
| loss_count only gets to 1 in tfrc_rx_hist_loss_indicated.
|
Again the resolution is in the next patch:
* when loss_count = 0 (no loss so far), loss_indicated() is called, sets
loss_count = 2
* when loss_count = 1, __one_after_loss() is called, which checks if this a
genuine loss
--> it then has the line
h->loss_count = 2; /* second packet lost */
* when loss_count = 2, __two_after_loss() is called,
- this function returns 1 when the current packet indicates a genuine loss
- in that case loss_count is set to 3
* when loss_count = 3, __three_after_loss() is called, and the whole structure
is recycled.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
