| >
| > distcc[24516] ERROR: compile
/root/.ccache/packet_his.tmp.aspire.home.net.24512.i on _tiptop failed
| > /usr/src/davem-2.6/net/dccp/ccids/lib/packet_history.c: In function
'__one_after_loss':
| > /usr/src/davem-2.6/net/dccp/ccids/lib/packet_history.c:266: error: lvalue
required as unary '&' operand
<snip>
|
| Because you do it this way:
|
| tfrc_rx_hist_swap(&TFRC_RX_HIST_ENTRY(h, 0), &TFRC_RX_HIST_ENTRY(h, 3));
|
| I checked and at least in this patch series all uses are of this type,
| so why not do it using just the indexes, which would be simpler:
|
| tfrc_rx_hist_swap(h, 0, 3);
|
| With this implementation:
|
| static void tfrc_rx_hist_swap(struct tfrc_rx_hist *h, const int a, const int
b)
| {
| const int idx_a = tfrc_rx_hist_index(h, a),
| int idx_b = tfrc_rx_hist_index(h, b);
| struct tfrc_rx_hist_entry *tmp = h->ring[idx_a];
|
| h->ring[idx_a] = h->ring[idx_b];
| h->ring[idx_b] = tmp;
| }
|
Agreed, that is useful in the present case, since then everything uses
inlines. The only suggestion I'd like to make is to use `u8' instead of
`int' since the indices will have very low values.
There is a related point: you will probably have noticed that loss_interval.c
also uses macros. I don't know if you are planning to convert these also into
inlines. I think that there would be less benefit in converting these, since
they are locl to loss_interval.c and mostly serve to improve readability.
As I have at least one other patch to revise (plus another minor one),
I'll rework this according to the above.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
