Hi Tom,
I had checked out the workspace on 27-Apr and the names were changed after that. So.
Before we do the interface extraction, I'd like to discuss the objectives. For example, I think typed returns from collection-valued methods are easier to use and more robust than untyped returns. In the Table class, there are e.g. Set getColumns() which I'd prefer Set<Column> if we think it's ok to support only JDK 5, or Column[ ] getColumns() or if the objective is to support earlier versions of JDK.
And I'd like to have a chance to really review the package in detail before the extraction is done. Can you give us another week?
Thanks,
Craig
On Apr 30, 2005, at 1:33 AM, Thomas Dudziak wrote:
When you bring ddlutils over to the db.apache.org area, is there an intent to change package names? Or are you planning on keeping the package org.apache.commons.sql?
I'm asking because if there is a renaming exercise it would be a good time to split the interfaces from the implementations...
Actually, I already changed the package names to org.apache.ddlutils. Only there is no mailing list notification of changes in SVN setup'd yet. I'll revamp the doc this weekend and introduce a couple of unit tests, so the interface extraction could be done at the beginning of next week, I think.
regards, Tom
Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
