thanks Paul. this should serve notice to caretakers that the facilities are there for these designations and will be accepted when the data is processed through the spec checker.
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Paul Gibian > Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 8:54 AM > To: Paul Sexton; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: connectors between songs conventions > > > We do have a variety of symbols. They are: > > ; Songs not continuing into each other (or whose transition has not > been examined). > > Songs segue into each other by means of a defined jam or > contiguous > transition -- a guzinta. > ~ Songs segue into each other, not by means of a defined transition, > but through an intentional pause. > ;; Two songs separated by a pause of greater than 60 seconds, e.g. > (song1) ;; (song2), sometimes with timing of space between songs > noted, e.g. > (song1); [3:20] ; (song2). > % Tape splice, flip or pause prevents examination of the > space between > songs, e.g. (song1)\ (song2). > # Part of song is missing. Location of missing chunk indicated by > placement of symbol. > > > > I admit that I have not used all of them for listings... > > Paul > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Paul Sexton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 6:34 PM > Subject: connectors between songs conventions > > > > Some time ago there was some discussion about the possibility of making > more > > sophisticated the usage of connectors between songs to better indicate > what > > actually occured. It seems that a ">" to indicate everything from a > shorter > > than usual pause to true musical continuity is inadequate. Although a > more > > complicated system could cause more confusion than it is worth, I was > > wondering if anyone else thought that, given the reference nature of > > deadlists.com, it might be possible to give this some consideration. > > > > Or, not. > > > > >
