> (Question-1): Does this mean that the DOFs are arranged (at least > conceptually) as: > > U = (u1,v1,u2,v2 ... u4,v4,p1...p4) transposed? (for a 4 noded 2D > element)
No. It's not arranged like this, but in the end the actual arrangement is also not very important. The only thing is that the arrangement is in exactly the same order as the global indices that you can get from cell->get_dof_indices (...) W. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Wolfgang Bangerth email: [email protected] www: http://www.math.tamu.edu/~bangerth/ _______________________________________________ dealii mailing list http://poisson.dealii.org/mailman/listinfo/dealii
