Mihai, it was not really a unification, since the 1D face classes have only been declared, but not implemented. A lot more work is needed to provide the actual functionality.
Sorry, Guido Wolfgang Bangerth wrote: >> one question concerning the new 1D unification features in release 7. Is it >> now possible to use the MeshWorker framework for 1D problems with >> relatively minor modifications? I have tried this for step-12 and I get >> several exceptions stemming from >> >> dealii::InvalidAccessor (with structdim=0, dim = 1, spacedim = 1) >> and >> dealii::InvalidAccessor<0, 1, >> 1>::InvalidAccessor(dealii::Triangulation<1,1> const*, int, int, void >> const*) >> > > A minimal testcase would help. I think we should be able to implement most of > it now, though not integration on faces which I assume is what you really > want. > > W. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Wolfgang Bangerth email: [email protected] > www: http://www.math.tamu.edu/~bangerth/ > _______________________________________________ > dealii mailing list http://poisson.dealii.org/mailman/listinfo/dealii > _______________________________________________ dealii mailing list http://poisson.dealii.org/mailman/listinfo/dealii
