I know that both components will behave quite differently, thus I assumed that I have to use two grids. In addition I was interested in how both parameters evolve over time. If I need only one grid, then I still have to store them separately, but it would be closer to example 33, wouldn't it?
Am Dienstag, 11. Juli 2017 22:22:39 UTC+2 schrieb Wolfgang Bangerth: > > On 07/11/2017 08:29 AM, 'Maxi Miller' via deal.II User Group wrote: > > Which of those two approaches is more beneficial for me (especcially > after I > > would like to extend it afterwards to two additional equations? Or is > there > > another approach I did not consider yet? > > I don't think I quite understand your two options, but in any case: What > is > the reason why you need two different meshes? Is the qualitative behavior > of > the two variables vastly different? Unless the diffusion constants for the > two > variables is vastly different, there is usually no particularly good > reason to > use different meshes. > > Best > W> > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Wolfgang Bangerth email: bang...@colostate.edu > <javascript:> > www: http://www.math.colostate.edu/~bangerth/ > > -- The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/ For mailing list/forum options, see https://groups.google.com/d/forum/dealii?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "deal.II User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dealii+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
