Hi Lucus, To add to what I just said (and to try to answer your question more fully / properly), this particular problem admittedly only has homogeneous constraints. See some of the code-gallery examples <https://github.com/dealii/code-gallery>, e.g. this one <https://github.com/dealii/code-gallery/blob/master/Quasi_static_Finite_strain_Quasi_incompressible_ViscoElasticity/viscoelastic_strip_with_hole.cc#L1924>, for a case where non-homogeneous boundary conditions are applied. This better illustrates that the discussion in this part of the tutorial is about.
Regards, Jean-Paul On Monday, August 28, 2017 at 5:26:08 PM UTC+2, Jean-Paul Pelteret wrote: > > Hi Lucas, > > I see, now I understand to what you were referring. > > Yes, the specific example that you've shown here is an intentional > redundancy. Previous experiences has shown that we all have a tendency to > copy-paste the tutorials and work from them (that is their intended use > after all :-). I put this in place to ensure that one doesn't accidentally > forget the "else" case when refactoring this code. It would be very easy to > do, and could be a tricky error to track down. Furthermore, it also > reinforces what was discussed in the introductory paragraph above it. > > So I agree fully that this is not required. One could in fact reduce this > entire implementation of the constraints to only a few lines. But in the > interest of clarity it will remain in its current form for now :-) > > Regards, > Jean-Paul > -- The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/ For mailing list/forum options, see https://groups.google.com/d/forum/dealii?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "deal.II User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dealii+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
