death penalty news

June 1, 2004


MEXICO / USA:

Legislators from Mexico, U.S. discuss terrorism, migration, capital punishment

Terrorism, migration and Mexico's steadfast opposition to capital 
punishment topped the agenda Friday as 35 U.S. and Mexican legislators 
launched two days of meetings on issues on issues affecting the North 
American neighbors.

Neither side said it expected major agreements, but both voiced hope 
participants would find a better understanding of the neighbors' differing 
perspectives.

"There aren't any goals. It's not about who can gain this or who can gain 
that," said Francisco Barrio, a member of Mexico's lower house of 
representatives from President Vicente Fox's National Action Party. Barrio 
is leading Mexico's delegation of eight senators and 12 representatives.

Visiting from Washington are eight representatives -- five Republicans, two 
Democrats and one Independent -- and three senators: two Democrats and one 
Republican.

Headed by Republican Rep. Jim Kolbe of Arizona, the delegation also 
includes lawmakers from Alabama, California, Connecticut, Illinois, New 
Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio, and Texas.

Delegations of U.S. and Mexican lawmakers have held annual meetings each 
year since 1960 -- except 1993, when the U.S. Congress was debating the 
North American Free Trade Agreement, or NAFTA.

U.S. leaders say they are most interested in talking trade and discussing 
anti-terrorism measures, as well as addressing Mexico's ongoing fight 
against drug traffickers and organized crime. The continual and often 
illegal migration of Mexicans into the United States remains a top priority 
for Mexican lawmakers.

"Illegal migration is a reality that's not going to change in the next few 
years," Barrio said. "Recognizing that and focusing on how to turn it into 
a win-win situation for both nations, that's what's preferable."

But Kolbe noted that as much as either side might want an agreement on 
migration "this issue more than other issues doesn't get solved at the 
bilateral level."

"It's up to each congress to legislate it," he said. "Therefore, we can 
only exchange ideas. ... These meetings will start their debate."

Kolbe added that he also believed there was little chance of any movement 
on the issue in the United States given that it's an election year.

Jeff Sessions, a Republican from Alabama and leader of the Senate 
delegation, added that while Mexican migration to the United States has 
benefited people on both sides of the border, "we do believe any country is 
allowed to set its own standard."

"The United States has the right and a duty" to establish a system that 
protects its borders, he said. "I believe we can create a system that is 
beneficial to both countries."

The recent U.S. security crackdown on the Arizona border has drawn 
criticism from Mexican leaders, who worry that overzealous authorities may 
violate the human rights of those trying to sneak across. U.S. agents armed 
with the latest technology have flooded the area to cut down on drug 
trafficking and illegal migrant crossings.

"Mexico should have been consulted before the crackdown began," Barrio said.

Another source of contention between the two sides is Mexico's staunch 
opposition to the death penalty, which is in effect in many of the states 
represented by visiting U.S. lawmakers.

Last month, the International Court of Justice in The Hague, Netherlands, 
ruled that the United States violated the rights of 51 Mexicans on death 
row by failing to inform them of their right to consult with their 
government, and ordered Washington to review their cases. The United States 
often has ignored the court's rulings, however.

"We are simply proposing that the United States follow international law," 
Barrio said. "It's simple."

In a small victory for Mexico on Thursday, the Oklahoma Court of Criminal 
Appeals indefinitely postponed the execution of Osbaldo Torres, a convicted 
murderer from Mexico, pending further court review.

(source: AP / SFGate.com)


==================


JAPAN:

Death penalty bad for victims' relatives, U.S. campaigner says

A son of a murdered man in the United States voiced opposition Saturday to 
the death penalty as "bad for victims of crime."

At a symposium on capital punishment in Tokyo, sponsored by the Japan 
Federation of Bar Associations, Renny Cushing, the executive director of 
Murder Victims' Families for Reconciliation, said bereaved families of 
victims are expected to welcome the execution of offenders, even if they 
are opposed to the death penalty.

Cushing told the audience of more than 200 people that there is a 
stereotype saying victims want or need the death penalty. But Cushing 
called such expectations "re-victimization" as they "take away my values."

Cushing's father was shot to death in 1988 but Cushing opposed capital 
punishment before the incident.

He said he wants to live in "a world where life is respected" and did not 
want to lose this values because of his father's murder. The change would 
"make the tragedy worse," he said.

Cushing, a former member of New Hampshire's state house of representatives, 
also noted that a society with the death penalty tends to focus on how 
offenders will be punished while ignoring victims.

He said people should think about what victims need and how to help them, 
and he showed appreciation of a JFBA proposal calling for establishing a 
system to fully support crime victims and bereaved families and to enable 
them to recover from their losses.

In the November 2002 proposal, Japan's largest lawyers' group said the 
government should suspend executions until public debate over capital 
punishment reaches a certain consensus, though the JFBA has never sought an 
end to the death penalty.

Cushing said he once drafted a bill to abolish the death penalty in order 
to say, as a member of a bereaved family, "no more killing."

His lecture is part of a series of nationwide JFBA symposiums on capital 
punishment prior to the federation's annual human rights meeting in October 
in the city of Miyazaki.

It will be the first time the JFBA brings up capital punishment at one of 
its human rights meeting.

The Tokyo symposium on Saturday will be followed by six others in Osaka, 
Sendai, Matsuyama, Sapporo, Hiroshima and Fukuoka.

(source: Kyodo News / Japan Today)

Reply via email to