July 28


TEXAS:

2 days, 2 death sentences in Houston


Jurors decided Wednesday a man should be put to death for fatally shooting
his ex-girlfriend's younger sisters last September.

The sentence comes a day after a jury in another case rejected a man's
claim of mental retardation and decided he should be put to death for
robbing and shooting a Houston beauty supply store owner last October.

Anthony Quinn Francois, 36, was convicted of capital murder last week for
the killing of Ashley Patterson, 11, and Britteny Patterson, 10, on Sept.
11, 2003. He also was accused but wasn't tried in the shooting death of a
third sister, Naikesha Patterson, 15.

Police said Francois shot the girls after learning his 16-year-old
ex-girlfriend had decided to date someone closer to her age. In addition
to killing the 3 girls, Francois wounded his ex-girlfriend and her mother.

"This man slaughtered a family, and I think the verdict the jury gave was
highly appropriate," Assistant District Attorney Terese Buess said.

Defense attorneys asked for leniency, telling jurors Francois was abused
by his stepfather and was a child of rape.

On Tuesday, another Harris County jury sentenced Calvin Letroy Hunter for
the shooting death of Jong Suk Choi, 30, at his store.

Hunter, 33, stood with his arms crossed as state District Judge Belinda
Hill read the verdict, culminating 10 hours of jury deliberations over two
days. Testimony in the punishment phase of the capital murder trial
spanned 2 weeks. He was convicted on July 14.

Defense attorneys had said a life sentence was the appropriate punishment,
contending Hunter is mentally retarded and executing him would be
unconstitutional. Lawyers pointed to Hunter scoring a 64 on an IQ test as
a child, 6 points below the threshold considered as mental retardation.
However, a test administered after his arrest last year put his IQ at 74.

Jurors watched a surveillance video that showed Hunter enter the store,
ask about merchandise, then pull a pistol and without warning shoot Choi
in the head.

Hunter then demanded money from Choi's wife. The video shows her crying
and screaming as she steps over her husband's body to open the cash
register.

"He's a cold and calculated killer," Assistant District Attorney Luci
Davidson told jurors. "This is the type of person the death penalty was
meant for."

During the sentencing phase, police testified they believe Hunter also was
responsible for the slaying of Nguyen Lu during a Nov. 12 convenience
store robbery and a series of other armed robberies in September. He has
not been charged in those cases.

Hunter's attorneys conceded he poses a threat.

"Thank God he was caught. This guy was bad," defense attorney Kyle Johnson
told jurors. "There's nobody in this room that wants this guy to ever
breathe another breath of fresh air. It just can't be."

The only relatives of victims in the courtroom Tuesday were 2 of Lu's
nieces.

"It's exactly what I wanted," Lien Lu, 29, told the Houston Chronicle.

"He deserved it," Diana Lu, 18, added.

(source: Associated Press)

*************************

Francois gets death penalty for killing young sisters


Jurors sentenced Anthony Francois to death Wednesday for killing his
ex-girlfriend's younger sisters during a jealous rampage.

Francois was convicted last week of 1 count of capital murder for the
deaths of the 2 youngest sisters.

In a taped confession played for jurors, Francois said he shot the entire
family because he was enraged that 17-year-old Shemeka Patterson had a new
boyfriend.

Patterson's three younger sisters, Nikesha, 15, Ashely, 11, and Brittany,
10, were killed. Shemeka and her mother were also shot but both survived.

In the videotaped confession, 36-year-old Francois talked about his
relationship with then 16-year-old Shemeka Patterson.

"It wouldn't be a lie to say I felt like that if I couldn't have her,
nobody could. I don't know what made me do something to the whole family,"
he said in the confession.

Francois told homicide detective Brian Harris how he struggled with the
thought of killing his former girlfriend's family.

"Something say 'do it', something say 'don't do it', over and over in my
mind. Her momma came in the room, and I don't know, I just snapped. I was
just losing control. It just happened so fast," Francois continued on the
tape.

He also expressed sorrow for the shootings. "I have remorse about her
sisters. It was nothing between her family and me. I couldn't see nothing
but Shemeka. She was saying a bunch of to irritate me. The bottom line is
she didn't want to be with me no more," he said.

After seeing the confession, the victims' grandmother also expressed
sorrow for Francois.

"I really do. I feel sorry for him. Because it looked like he really did
love Shemeka, and I don't know what went wrong between them, but like I
said, I never did know him just personal. But I got sympathy for people .
I felt real sorry for him, and I hate that he did what he did do, but I
can't take nothing back from what he done did, I lost a great bit, too,"
said Dorothy Patterson.

It's not clear if Francois will be tried for the death of the 3rd sister
and the shootings of Patterson and her mother.

(source: KHOU News)

*****************

Man receives death sentence for shooting store owner


A Harris County jury rejected a man's claim of mental retardation and
decided he should be put to death for robbing and shooting a Houston
beauty supply store owner last October.

Calvin Letroy Hunter, 33, stood with his arms crossed as state District
Judge Belinda Hill read the verdict Tuesday, culminating 10 hours of jury
deliberations over 2 days. Testimony in the punishment phase of the
capital murder trial spanned 2 weeks.

Hunter was convicted of capital murder July 14 for the shooting death of
Jong Suk Choi, 30, at his store.

Jurors watched a surveillance video that showed Hunter enter the store,
ask about merchandise, then pull a pistol and without warning shoot Choi
in the head.

Hunter then demanded money from Choi's wife. The video shows her crying
and screaming as she steps over her husband's body to open the cash
register.

"He's a cold and calculated killer," Assistant District Attorney Luci
Davidson told jurors. "This is the type of person the death penalty was
meant for."

During the sentencing phase, police testified they believe Hunter also was
responsible for the slaying of Nguyen Lu during a Nov. 12 convenience
store robbery and a series of other armed robberies in September. He has
not been charged in any other those cases.

Hunter's attorneys conceded he poses a threat.

"Thank God he was caught. This guy was bad," defense attorney Kyle Johnson
told jurors. "There's nobody in this room that wants this guy to ever
breathe another breath of fresh air. It just can't be."

But defense attorneys said a life sentence was the appropriate punishment,
contending Hunter is mentally retarded and executing him would be
unconstitutional. Lawyers pointed to Hunter scoring a 64 on an IQ test as
a child, six points below the threshold considered as mental retardation.
However, a test administered after his arrest last year put his IQ at 74.

The only relatives of victims in the courtroom Tuesday were two of Lu's
nieces.

"It's exactly what I wanted," Lien Lu, 29, told the Houston Chronicle.

"He deserved it," Diana Lu, 18, added.

(source: Associated Press)

********************

Kerr murder suspect deemed fit for trial


Kerr County deputies made preparations today to transport capital murder
suspect Vincent Seard back from a state mental hospital after being
informed that doctors there deem him competent for trial.

Seard, 40, was sent to the North Texas State Mental Hospital in Vernon for
treatment 7 months ago after prosecutors and defense counsel agreed that
he couldn't assist in his defense at trial. He is charged with the March
10, 2003 slayings of Comfort area residents Patricia Kutzer and Terry
Ingram.

Arrested 4 days after the beating deaths at Kutzer's farm, the Houston
man's stay at the county jail was marked by religious ravings, delusional
behavior and outbursts of violence.

(source: San Antonio Express-News)

***********************

Inmate health care now up to standard----Report says privatization has
helped the state better conditions


Nearly every Texas inmate who gets sick now receives health care that
meets national standards, prison health officials will report today.

That's a far cry from a decade ago, when just 40 % of inmates received
proper care and the state grappled with a federal court order to improve
the deplorable conditions faced by prisoners.

Today's 97 % rate of care comes primarily from privatization of the
system, the report said. The state gave the job of caring for prisoners to
the University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston and Texas Tech
University in 1993.

--

INMATE CARE

Health care in Texas prisons has improved, but costs remain low compared
with California's similarly sized system: . Texas inmate population :
147,000

- Annual prison medical costs: $315 million

- California inmate population: 160,000

- Annual prison medical costs: $1 billion

(source: University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston)

--

Increased medical staffing, falling death rates for AIDS and other
diseases, and technology have also contributed to improved care, said the
report, published in today's issue of the Journal of the American Medical
Association.

"We think this is a success story," said Dr. Ben Raimer, the report's lead
author and vice president of community outreach for UTMB.

The report was co-written by UTMB President Dr. John Stobo.

An accompanying editorial in the journal, written by Dr. Newton Kendig,
medical director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, hails the Texas
system's collaboration with academic medicine as a model for other states.

But prisoner-rights activists called the results a sham, saying the data
have not been verified by physicians outside the prison health care
network. The report is based on medical records kept by prison system
health care workers.

"It's a complete and total fraud," said activist Ray Hill, host of The
Prison Show on KPFT-FM (90.1) radio.

Hill said that of the 200 letters he receives each week from Texas
inmates, one-third concern problems with health care.

Turning to academia

A successful federal lawsuit filed by inmate David Ruiz in 1974 eventually
forced the state to improve conditions, including health care, for
inmates.

To meet part of the ruling by U.S. District Judge William Justice, the
Texas Legislature turned over the state's $300 million-a-year prison
health care business to the universities. UTMB serves about 78 % of the
state's 147,000 prisoners, with Tech seeing the remainder.

The report suggests that the plan has succeeded. As medical costs have
skyrocketed in the private sector, the academic institutions held prisoner
costs down. In 1993, the average daily medical cost per prisoner,
according to state figures, was $5.99. Last year it was $6.23, just 24
cents more.

According to some measures, U.S. general health care costs doubled during
the same time period.

Quality care for low cost

Even as costs remained essentially flat, the quality of care has risen,
the report said.

A decade ago, just 34 % of patients with asthma received a level of care
recommended by national medical associations - the same standards that
apply in any local doctor's office. Now, based upon medical records of
inmates, 97 % of asthma patients receive proper diagnosis, medication and
follow-up care.

The researchers found similar improvements in complying with national
standards of care with other diseases such as type 1 diabetes, high blood
pressure and heart disease.

The results are mirrored by a reduction in deaths. As the national death
rate from asthma has remained at 1.5 deaths per 100,000 people, it has
dropped from 3.5 per 100,000 in Texas prisons a decade ago to nearly zero
now.

Technology advancement

Raimer said the academic institutions have been able to keep costs down by
using new technology, namely telemedicine, which allows a specialist in
Galveston or Lubbock to diagnose and treat a patient in a prison infirmary
- saving a costly trip from the prison unit to a hospital, overtime for
guards and other expenses.

About 30 percent of doctor's visits at prison units are now done via
telemedicine, with UTMB alone performing 3,000 a month.

As a result, the state's costs per prisoner are lower than those of most
states. California, with a comparable inmate population of 160,000, spends
about $1 billion on health care, more than three times the $315 million
Texas now pays to the academic institutions to manage prisoner health.

Critics say this drive to cut costs has hindered care.

Debating the data

Sharon Gray, who lives in Houston, began keeping a file of inmate
complaints about 6 months ago after a discussion with a prison doctor made
her feel as though prison physicians were callous to patients' needs. The
doctor, Gray said, laughed about a prisoner's medical problem and asked
Gray why she would care about an inmate's health.

She has files on more than 40 prisoners now, and she said the report does
not match the prisoner concerns she's heard.

"This simply hasn't been my experience, over and over and over again," she
said. "Health care in the prison system is a long way from being OK. It's
hideous."

Gray cites numerous problems. A man with bowel problems after prostate
cancer surgery, for example, used a dozen adult diapers every day. Then,
with no immediate access to a toilet, he suddenly was cut to 6 diapers a
week. A man with a broken tooth could not get into see a dentist.

She said a study based on prison medical records is problematic because
records can be altered - and, based on the claims of some inmates with
whom she corresponds, they have been.

Independent oversight

Prison officials denied the claims of record tampering.

Another complaint from critics is a lack of independent oversight; an
office of standards within the Texas Department of Criminal Justice is now
the primary watchdog. Hill and others would like to see regular scrutiny
of prison health care by an external organization such as the Texas State
Board of Medical Examiners.

Raimer said the Texas Medical Foundation, an independent organization of
licensed physicians, will audit the prison health care system later this
year.

HIV disputes

A lack of objective eyes, Hill said, allows the prison system to
underreport HIV and AIDS deaths because it doesn't test for infection. If
a patient dies of AIDS complications, such as pneumonia, but there was no
test for AIDS, pneumonia is listed as the cause of death, Hill said.

"I have known inmates who have begged for HIV tests but have died before
the tests arrived," Hill said.

That's just not so, prison officials say. All offenders are tested for HIV
after intake, unless they refuse, said Dr. Michael Kelley, director of
preventive medicine for the prison system.

After that, Kelley said, inmates can ask to be tested every 6 months.

Since the academic institutions have taken over prison health care, deaths
attributable to AIDS have fallen from 1.5 per 1,000 inmates in 1995 to 0.2
deaths per 1,000 prisoners in 2002.

"Basically," Kelley said of AIDS patients, "everyone who meets the U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services guidelines for when to initiate
therapy has been offered treatment."

(source: Houston Chronicle)

***********************************

BINGHAM DISCUSSES NEW LAB'S CREDIBILITY


The new forensic lab in Smith County has received several autopsy requests
recently after the district attorney and the forensic administrator
discussed questions concerning the center's credibility.

County officials became hesitant to use the lab and its lead pathologist,
Dr. Delbert Van Dusen, who allegedly conducted autopsies in Harris County
without a Texas license in 1998.

He was not charged with any wrongdoing and has since received a license in
the state.

Smith County District Attorney Matt Bingham said Tuesday he was not
passing judgment on Van Dusen and that everyone he talked to, including
prosecutors in Houston, indicated the pathologist was competent, honest
and qualified.

But Bingham still does not want to have to deal with any issue of
credibility on the witness stand that could possibly jeopardize the
state's case in a murder trial, he said.

He discussed his worries with Forensic Administrator Richard Skinner.

Bingham said it was agreed there would be no problems with using the lab
if its second pathologist, Dr. Tommy Brown, performed the autopsies of
possible homicide victims instead of Van Dusen - for now.

He said administrators at the center volunteered Brown to conduct
autopsies of all bodies brought in by law enforcement officials.

Bingham has no ability to mandate the county and to what lab it sends
autopsy requests. But to have Brown perform the procedures was his
preference, he said.

Bingham and Skinner also agreed the center should remain manned 24 hours
to preserve the integrity of the bodies.

Initially, law enforcement officials and funeral directors who brought
bodies to the center after hours were to enter in a code at the back door
to gain access and drop off the body.

Bingham said that was not acceptable.

As of Monday, a credible officer was placed at the building throughout the
night, and will be stationed there each night, to receive bodies and to
make sure they are not tampered with.

NO MORE PROBLEMS

With those guaranties, Bingham said, he did not have any problem with
local law enforcement using the lab for autopsies involved in criminal
investigations - he had no reason to question its integrity or ability.

But he doesn't believe the county should have a contract with anyone. If
officials decide to send one body to Dallas for autopsy and another body
to the lab in Smith County, they should be able to, he said.

"The officers and JPs can send them (the bodies) where they want to send
them," he said. "But if they're asking my opinion, that's it."

Justices of the peace and police officers make the decision where to send
the bodies for investigation. Before the new center opened, bodies from
Smith County were sent to Dallas County.

The new lab, which opened July 1, is expected to cut down on cost and
time.

In January 1998, officials discovered Van Dusen had performed unsupervised
autopsies in Harris County without a license from the Texas State Board of
Medical Examiners. Court documents stated Dr. Joye Carter, who was Harris
County medical examiner at the time, fraudulently told Van Dusen he would
be working under a fellowship program, which would qualify him to legally
practice medicine in Texas, the Associated Press reported.

Van Dusen, who was licensed to practice in Georgia and Indiana, ultimately
received his Texas license after several rejections and was no billed by a
grand jury that investigated whether he illegally practiced medicine.

Skinner said the center, located at 11980 N. Texas Highway 155, has
received several bodies from Smith County and surrounding areas already.

He said he is in discussions with other areas and the center would be
handling a "large number of counties" in East Texas.

(source: Tyler Morning Telegraph)






TENNESSEE:

State to seek death penalty in Elliot case


The state has decided to seek the death penalty against a Franklin County
resident accused of killing his ex-wife and daughter and shooting his son.

Parker Ray Elliott has been indicted by the Maury County Grand Jury on 2
counts of 1st-degree murder and 1 count each of felony murder, attempted
1st-degree murder and especially aggravated burglary, according to court
records.

Elliott is accused of going to the home of his ex-wife Freda in Culleoka
on June 24 and firing a .22-caliber handgun. Elliott's 18-year-old
daughter Rachel was killed and his 15-year-old son Seth was wounded. And
the former Mrs. Elliott died 2 days after the incident.

According to District Attorney General Mike Bottoms, Elliott was living in
Belvidere with his mother at the time of the incident. Elliott was
arrested June 28 after a wide-scale manhunt by officials from several
counties.

Maury County General Sessions Judge Lee Bailey entered an automatic "not
guilty" plea on Elliott's behalf during a court appearance July 2. A trial
date has not been set. District Public Defender Claudia Jack is
representing Elliott, and has indicated she may seek a change of venue for
the trial because of substantial media coverage.

"Each murder case has its individual characteristics," Bottoms said
regarding his decision to seek the death penalty. "You have to look at the
aggravating circumstances, the facts about the individual.

"These things take a while and I'm sure this will too," added Bottoms, who
has tried a number of trials involving the death penalty. He predicted
many pre-trial motions before the actual trial started. He added that the
possibility of a death sentence also allows the possibility of life with
parole or life without parole, but it will be to a jury to decide, he
added.

(source: The Tullahoma News)






USA:

Teen Death Row


Science shows clearly what most parents know and the U.S. Supreme Court
needs to acknowledge: Even at 16 and 17, teenagers' minds are not fully
developed.

A review of the research on teen brains is part of a brief, from a group
led by the American Medical Association, that was sent to the court as it
prepares for oral arguments this fall about a 17-year-old murderer now on
Missouri's death row. One study cited in the AMA brief suggests "maturity
is incomplete until age 19." For those ages 16 and 17, certainly,
childhood impulse has not totally yielded to adult reason.

Vigorous pleas to stop executing people for crimes committed at that age
also have come in from religious leaders, child advocacy groups, legal
coalitions and even diplomats. This will be a widely watched case.

The court has already banned the death penalty for crimes committed by
children younger than 16 and anyone with mental retardation. But some
states allow execution for crimes by 16- and 17-year-olds even though,
nationwide, 18 is the common age for adult responsibilities such as
voting, military service, signing contracts and so on.

This country may never be able to settle on one age at which to confer
adult status. In Michigan, which does not have the death penalty, children
of virtually any age can be tried as adults; meanwhile, lawmakers put
increasing restrictions on teens, such as graduated licenses when they
start to drive.

Such incoherence about when the rights and responsibilities of adulthood
begin actually bolsters the argument against executing 16- and
17-year-olds. With their legal status so muddled, the ultimate and final
penalty should not remain among the options.

(source: Detroit Free Press, Editorial)






MASSACHUSETTS:

Lawyer Shortage Said Hurting Defendants


The state's highest court ruled Wednesday that a shortage of defense
lawyers caused by low pay is violating the constitutional rights of some
indigent defendants, and said criminal cases must be dismissed against
those who go without a lawyer for more than 45 days.

The Supreme Judicial Court, ruling in a long-simmering dispute over the
rate of pay for private lawyers who represent poor defendants, also ruled
that criminal defendants cannot be held more than 7 days in jail without a
lawyer.

It was not immediately clear how many people now being held in jails
across the state could have the charges dropped against them because of
the ruling.

In its ruling, the court noted that the $30-per-hour pay for lawyers who
represent indigent defendants in district court has barely changed over
the last 2 decades and is among the lowest in the country.

"The continuation of what is now an unconstitutional state of affairs
cannot be tolerated," the court said in its ruling. "Our duty is to remedy
an ongoing violation of a fundamental constitutional right to counsel
consistently with the government's legitimate right to protect the
public's safety."

The ruling came in 2 lawsuits filed on behalf of poor defendants in
Hampden County by civil libertarians and an agency that provides lawyers
for people who can't afford them.

The Committee for Public Counsel Services said there are more than 50
defendants in western Massachusetts who have been denied their right to
consult with an attorney because the agency was unable to find private
attorneys to take the cases.

The CPCS has about 110 staff lawyers - not nearly enough to handle the
more than 200,000 cases involving indigent defendants each year. So the
agency relies heavily on private lawyers to represent poor defendants. The
agency says finding these lawyers - called "bar advocates" - has become
increasingly difficult because the pay is not enough to cover their
overhead costs.

Lawyers from across the state have complained about the low rates, some
cases refusing to take any new cases until the pay dispute has been
resolved.

(source: The Associated Press)



Reply via email to