August 16


VIRGINIA:

U.S. Supreme Court lifts stay


James Edward Reid is on death row for the brutal killing of Annie Lester.

The U.S. Supreme Court decided Wednesday to lift the stay of execution of
an inmate facing death for the 1996 slaying of an elderly Christiansburg
woman.

The decision clears the way for the setting of an execution date for James
Edward Reid. But it does not mean Reid is barred from raising the claim
that his execution would constitute "cruel and unusual punishment," which
is prohibited by the U.S. Constitution, said one of Reid's attorneys,
Jimmy Turk of Radford. Reid is on death row for the brutal killing of
87-year-old Annie Lester.

The Supreme Court's brief order Wednesday is probably not the last word on
a case that has wended its way through various courts for eight years.

"We still certainly intend to pursue several legal issues from this point
forward," Turk said.

Montgomery County Circuit Judge Ray Grubbs, who sentenced Reid to death in
1998, has scheduled a conference call in the case for today, Turk said.

Attorney General Jerry Kilgore's office plans to ask Grubbs to set an
execution date for Reid, said Kilgore's press secretary, Tim Murtaugh.
Grubbs is required by law to set the execution date within 60 days, Turk
said.

The Supreme Court made its ruling in response to a request from Kilgore's
office, Murtaugh said. The 5-4 ruling did not specify a reason for the
decision. The attorney general's office had argued that the stay of
execution that the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals issued in the case
Dec. 17 was moot.

The appeals court, in Richmond, issued the stay the day before Reid was
scheduled for execution. The appeals court said at the time that it issued
the stay because the U.S. Supreme Court had agreed to hear a similar case
involving an Alabama inmate who claimed that lethal injection was cruel
and unusual punishment. The appeals court wanted to see how the higher
court would rule.

The Alabama inmate's past drug use would have required prison officials to
cut into his leg to find a vein to administer a lethal injection. Reid's
attorneys made a similar argument about the collapse of veins in his arms.

But Murtaugh said Reid had not raised the same claims as the Alabama
inmate. Based on that argument, the attorney general's office asked the
Supreme Court in July to lift the stay, Murtaugh said. The Supreme Court
had denied an earlier request to lift the stay.

Whatever date is set, the attorney general's office views it as a real
execution date, Murtaugh said.

"When you get to this point in a case like this, naturally the attention
seems to focus on the inmate," Murtaugh said. "But we prefer to focus on
the victim and her family and remember all the pain that they have
suffered."

Sgt. Curtis Brown, a detective with the Christiansburg Police Department
who is Lester's great-nephew, said he rejected the "cruel and unusual
punishment" argument that Reid's attorneys have made.

"It's kind of hard for me to have any sympathy, since my great-aunt was
stabbed 22 times, she was raped, she was beaten" in the head with a can of
condensed milk, and she was strangled with an electrical cord, Brown said.

He described Lester as an independent and opinionated woman who had
befriended Reid at church.

On Oct. 12, 1996, Reid went to Lester's house on Radford Street to do some
chores. She was killed sometime that afternoon. Reid, 58, has claimed he
was drunk and blacked out at the time of the slaying and has no memory of
it.

"I'm in favor of this sentence being carried out as soon as possible,"
Brown said.

But Jack Payden-Travers, director of Virginians for Alternatives to the
Death Penalty, called Reid "a poster child for why one might oppose the
death penalty."

"Once again, it just proves that capital punishment means those without
the capital get the punishment," Payden-Travers said.

Reid has been on death row since 1998, after he essentially entered guilty
pleas to capital murder, attempted rape and attempted robbery in Reid's
death on the advice of his attorneys.

Reid's sister, Ida Reid, argued that she and court personnel saw one of
Reid's attorneys, Pete Theodore, sleeping during court proceedings in his
case. Theodore has since been reprimanded by the Virginia State Bar in
connection with the case.

"If that's not substandard legal counsel, what is?" Ida Reid asked. She
described her brother as a brain-damaged alcoholic who doesn't know right
from wrong and could not have planned to kill Lester.

"This is foolishness," Ida Reid said of the decisions of various courts to
remove barriers to her brother's execution. "This is not what the death
penalty is for. Virginia has run amok."

(source: The Roanoke Times, Aug. 12)

[NOTE---Reid now has an execution date for September 9----source: VADP]




USA:

Medical groups seek end to death penalty for minors - Their legal brief is
one of dozens filed by groups worldwide that call for a U.S. ban on this
punishment.


The U.S. Supreme Court is considering the legality of sentencing children
younger than 18 to death, and the American Medical Association, American
Psychiatric Assn. and other medical societies are asking justices to put
an end to the practice.

In a friend-of-the court brief filed in the case of a 17-year-old
death-row inmate challenging his sentence, the medical groups say
adolescents are less developed than adults and should not be held to the
same standards.

"Our society understands the differences between adolescents and adults
when it comes to driving, drinking alcohol and smoking, voting, and
marriage," said Robert Weinstock, MD, a member of the APA's Committee on
Judicial Action. "We are contradicting ourselves to deny these privileges
to adolescents, yet still enforce the ultimate punishment on them --
death."

The medical associations argue that science has shown that adolescents --
even at age 16 or 17 -- underestimate risks and overestimate short-term
benefits. Studies also have shown that teens are more emotionally volatile
and more susceptible to stressful situations, they wrote.

"This court has held that executing a mentally retarded offender is
unlikely to 'affect the cold calculus that precedes the decision of other
potential murders,' " the brief states. "The same is true of older
'adolescents' whose calculus weighs inputs -- particularly, future
consequences -- differently from adults, and far differently from the
cold-blooded adult murderer for whom the death penalty is reserved."

The U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the case, Roper v.
Simmons, in its term that begins in October. The court will decide whether
to uphold the Missouri Supreme Court's decision that overturned
Christopher Simmons' death sentence on the grounds that it violated the
Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment.

The American Society for Adolescent Psychiatry, American Academy of Child
and Adolescent Psychiatry, American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law,
National Assn. of Social Workers, Missouri Chapter of the National Assn.
of Social Workers, and the National Mental Health Assn. also have signed
on to the brief. Dozens of other organizations from around the world have
weighed in on the case and are calling for the United States to ban the
death penalty for minors.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: AMA brief filed in Roper v. Simmons, in pdf
(www.abanet.org/crimjust/juvjus/simmons/ama.pdf)

(source: American Medical News)






MISSISSIPPI/USA:

Part II:---Death Penalty Unfairly Applied, Part II


Now that we have this person strapped on the gurney in the death chamber,
we search for a good vein in one arm. Then we put in an intravenous
needle.

Did you know that a medical doctor is not allowed to do this? Why? Because
in most states, including Mississippi, "medical ethics preclude doctors
from participating in executions."

Interesting. Perhaps others should be excused as well for ethical reasons.
How about ministers and teachers and all social workers? And let's add
parents and children; and anyone who has ever done something horribly
wrong.

I should think that all our supposedly fiscally conservative politicians
would want to be excused and would be clamoring to oppose our killings.
After all, the cost of execution is staggeringly more than the cost of
housing someone in prison for a lifetime.

The most comprehensive study in the country found that the death penalty
costs North Carolina $2.16 million per execution more than the costs of a
non-death penalty murder case. Enforcing the death penalty costs Florida
$51 million a year above and beyond what it would cost to punish all
1st-degree murderers with life in prison without parole. In addition,
Florida spent an average of $3.2 million per execution from 1976 to 1988.

In Texas, a death penalty case costs an average of $2.3 million, about 3
times the cost of imprisoning someone in a single cell at the highest
security level for 40 years. On a national basis, these figures translate
to an extra cost of over $1 billion dollars spent since 1976 on the death
penalty.

In this year of under-funded education in Mississippi, we and our
politicians feel that killing people is one of those things that is worth
our tax dollars.

Did I mention that the person we strapped to the gurney did have a chance
to speak with someone like a priest or preacher? We are, after all,
sensitive to the spiritual needs of this person we are killing.

In our part of the world, we often hear religious arguments for the death
penalty; usually they involve the Bible. A simple look at history will
show that we have done the same for other issues too, such as slavery and
segregation. People on both sides have used religion and the Bible to
argue their case.

The indisputable facts are these: Laws in the Christian Old Testament
advise the death penalty for a lot more than murder - they advise it for
rebellious teenagers, for working on the Sabbath, for blasphemy, and for
several other violations.

So why are those who claim the Bible as their authority not consistent?
Why do they not advocate killing in all these cases?

Israelite law required two and sometimes three eyewitnesses for a guilty
verdict - a test few murder trials today could meet. Several other verses
could be cited also, some in the New Testament.

On the other hand, the Bible also has stories and laws that limit,
question, or even disapprove of the death penalty, such as the
life-preserving punishment of the very first murderer, Cain, and Jesus
saving the life of the adulteress. How can this be?

Honesty demands that we recognize that all modern interpreters make their
own decisions based on their own values, training, and traditions. They
pick and choose which Bible verses, stories, and laws will inform their
view of state-sponsored killing. And then, when they argue, they lob their
chosen verses at the opposition and they reinterpret the ones that get
lobbed at them.

It is interesting to note, however, that most major Christian
denominations in the United States have spoken out against the death
penalty as inconsistent with grace, justice, and mercy, including the
Roman Catholic, Episcopal, Evangelical Lutheran, United Methodist,
Presbyterian Church (USA), and the United Church of Christ churches. Many
other religious groups concur.

So, after we have cared for this person's soul, strapped him or her onto
the gurney, and inserted the intravenous tube, we begin to fill his or her
veins with a series of poisons until pavulon (or pancuronium bromide)
paralyzes his or her muscle system and she or he stops breathing. Then
potassium chloride stops his or her heart.

This we will call "closure." "Closure" is what we will tell society and
families of murder victims they will have once we have killed this person.
Psychologically, it is highly questionable to present another killing as
"closure," because the loss will never be made up, no matter how many
persons we put to death, and, as many family members have testified, this
kind of "closure" does not heal. The pain of those who suffer calls us as
a community to provide support, comfort, and love, none of which requires
a killing.

Perhaps in our honest moments we would say that killing labeled as
"closure" is a code for "revenge." Revenge may be sweet at the time but in
the long run is not healing, and certainly does not make for a just
society. Revenge is a form of anger that fuels a never-ending cycle of
violence. The unspeakably sad and angry feelings are in every way
understandable, but they do not provide a proper foundation for a system
of justice.

The poison is in. The person is dead. We have killed him or her. This is
what we do, you and I. This is who we are. At the very least, our
politicians do it in your name and mine. It is not a rash act. It is
premeditated. We kill people as a solution to violence and we do it with
blatant inequality. Does this make sense? It is not justice. How do we
sleep? We could do better. We could tell our politicians to stop the
killing.

(source: James Bowley, Planet Weekly)



Reply via email to