death penalty news

December 20, 2004


CALIFORNIA:

Execution support wanes

On the surface, it looks like a pretty good week to support capital 
punishment: death sentences were handed down in three publicized cases, the 
state Supreme Court upheld two previous death sentences and a condemned man 
from San Mateo County was scheduled for lethal injection next month.

But take away the media hype and passions enflamed by gruesome case details 
and polls show support for state-sanctioned executions waning, said Lance 
G. Lindsey, executive director of San Francisco-based Death Penalty Focus.

Countries continue to abolish the practice, district attorneys refuse to 
ask for it and as of Friday, Kansas became the latest state in the nation 
to overturn the death penalty. However, none of that is publicized or 
carries the emotional weight of watching crowds cheer when Scott Peterson 
was condemned to die for killing his pregnant wife and fetus, Lindsey said.

Book-ended with the scheduled Jan. 19 execution of Donald J. Beardslee for 
the murders of two young women, the cases actually make work harder for 
death penalty opponents, he said.

"Our work is year-round and more effective when it isn't specifically tied 
to a case. It's hard to compete with the media dramatizing the worst 
aspects of a case and we're sometimes perceived as too dryly intellectual 
in our approach. It's not a good time to talk about why it should be 
abolished," Lindsey said.

According to Death Penalty Focus, death sentences nationwide have dropped 
54 percent and support hovers in the mid- to high-60 percent.

"Support is really dropping but you wouldn't know it by several major news 
stories right now," Lindsey said.

In the East Bay, brother Justin and Glenn Helzer were sentenced to death in 
separate trials. Peterson also received death as did "sausage king" Stuart 
Alexander. All four have years on death row ahead of them before the cycle 
of appeals even begin under current California legal conditions.

Lindsey said his group is also keeping its eye on a pending state Supreme 
Court ruling on executing inmates deemed mentally retarded. The U.S. 
Supreme Court found the practice unconstitutional but left it to individual 
states to decide the baseline. California has roughly 60 inmates that might 
be commuted if the national standard of 70 I.Q. is adopted.

Death Penalty Focus leaves advocacy for specific inmates to their legal 
teams and supporters. Instead, the group hopes California will one day 
follow in the footsteps of other states, like Kansas, which stopped the 
practice of executing inmates. New York is currently considering a similar 
move.

In 2000, Illinois began to examine its own use of the death penalty when 
Gov. George Ryan declared a moratorium on executions. Three years later, 
Ryan commuted the sentences of all 167 inmates awaiting execution after 
concluding several inmates were wrongfully convicted.

The California Senate last month established a three-year high-level 
commission to study capital punishment and possible wrongful executions. 
Some counties are considering a halt in pursuit of the death penalty until 
the report is returned; however, San Mateo County is not among them.

"It is unnecessary to have a moratorium and I don't believe we have the 
problems of Illinois in this state and definitely not in San Mateo County," 
said Chief Deputy District Attorney Steve Wagstaffe.

Lindsey disagrees, at least in terms of the state. He cites a study finding 
90 percent of California death row cases mimicking 85 major flaws found in 
Illinois.

"That is plenty to be concerned about," he said.

Lindsey wouldn't comment on whether Beardslee's case may contain those 
problems but the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals took up the matter late 
Thursday, only hours after his execution date was set. Defense attorneys 
claim inherent flaws in the state's case against Beardslee and point out 
that three of four special circumstances qualifying him for death have 
already been tossed by other courts.

Death Penalty Focus won't begin mobilizing protests against his execution 
until the appeals court rules. If the date sticks, he expects 
demonstrations throughout the state including an effort outside San Quentin 
Prison. Even then, ongoing defense pleas for clemency make anything possible.

"Dates can always go away at the last moment," Lindsey said.

Assistant district attorney Martin Murray is currently readying documents 
for Beardslee's anticipated clemency bid although it is unknown yet whether 
Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger would hold a public hearing or merely read 
paperwork. In the case of Kevin Cooper, scheduled to die before Beardslee 
until the reprieve of a last-minute federal stay, Schwarzenegger only read 
arguments from both sides before declining to pardon Cooper.

Lindsey hopes society at large one day agrees the death penalty is a 
political instrument applied disparately.

"It's race, place and poverty, not the nature of the crime ... Death 
sentences are selective. You can commit the same crime in San Francisco as 
in San Bernadino but have a different process," he said.

Lindsey also sees capital punishment as a financially wasteful numbers 
game. With more than 630 inmates on death row, it would take more than two 
years to clean it out with one daily execution. By then, he said, at the 
current addition rate the row wouldn't be reduced by much.

"It's a moral and financial waste and it's all beginning to add up for 
folks," he said.

(source: San Mateo Daily Journal)

Reply via email to