death penalty news

January 3, 2005


KENTUCKY:

Physician governor shouldn't be criticized for execution role

Governors in some states have the grim responsibility of signing death 
warrants for convicted criminals who have been sentenced to execution.

What if, however, the governor is also a physician?

Kentucky Gov. Ernie Fletcher has found himself in this position. Opponents 
of the death penalty in that state are criticizing the governor for signing 
a death warrant for convicted killer Thomas Clyde Bowling Jr.

Some say that Fletcher is violating the Hippocratic Oath, which is meant to 
prevent doctors from inflicting harm.

The Portland Press Herald/Maine Sunday Telegram opposes the death penalty. 
Set aside for a moment, however, the argument over whether the death 
penalty is appropriate - or whether physicians who administer lethal 
injections are violating the Hippocratic Oath. The death penalty is legal 
in the state of Kentucky, and the Kentucky governor is charged with the 
responsibility of signing the death warrant.

It's appropriate, then, for Fletcher in his capacity as governor to sign a 
death warrant to execute a criminal. He's not acting in his capacity as a 
physician when he does so.

There are also other situations in which doctors could find themselves 
responsible for the intentional death of another human being. What if a 
physician is sent to war, for instance, or what if an intruder breaks into 
a physician's home?

The execution of Bowling is on hold pending two lawsuits, The Associated 
Press reported. One that claims Bowling, who was convicted of killing a 
Lexington, Ky., couple in 1991, is mentally retarded and should not be 
executed.

Those fighting the death penalty would be better served by sticking to 
solid arguments against it - Bowling's mental capacity, for instance, or 
that too many innocent people end up on death row, or that the system is 
racially biased, or that civilized societies shouldn't kill people.

Using Fletcher's status as a physician drags politics into an argument 
better served by practicality.

(source: Editorial, Portland (Maine) Press Herald)


======================


CONNECTICUT:

Death Penalty Is Legal Until We Change It

I do not approve of the death penalty, which I regard as primitive and know 
to be unfairly distributed among our citizens. I do, however, strongly 
believe in obeying the law. I hope people will become, as time goes on, 
more and more willing to abandon this kind of punishment.

I hope it will not be long before we abandon this punishment. But let's 
have a little common sense here. Let's not decide to refuse the (legal) 
death penalty to a confessed murderer who chose to kill young girls in cold 
blood.

Let's work to change the law many regard as harsh and most of us know is 
unfairly distributed among our citizens.

Elizabeth S. Maxwell
Essex

(source: Letter to the Editor, The Day)

Reply via email to