actually, when George Ryan was here I told him that the chief Ayatollah in
Iran had announced that they were no longer going to execute juvenile
offenders. So in other words, Iran ended juvenile executions before the
United States. A sad commentary on us. but at least it is gone. fab.

Francis A. Boyle
Law Building
504 E. Pennsylvania Ave.
Champaign, IL 61820 USA
217-333-7954 (voice)
217-244-1478 (fax)
[email protected]
(personal comments only)
 


-----Original Message-----
From: Abolition Flash Card [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 10:29 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Juvenile Death Penalty Ruled Unconstitutional


ABOLITION FLASHCARD  
Amnesty International USA
Program to Abolish the Death Penalty (PADP)
March 1, 2005 -- Special

- - - - - - - - - - - -


NEWS FLASH!

The United States Supreme Court has ruled that sentencing juvenile offenders
to death is unconstitutional.

"Today, the Court repudiated the misguided idea that the United States can
pledge to leave no child behind while simultaneously exiling children to the
death chamber. Now, the US can proudly remove its name from the embarrassing
list of human rights violators that includes China, Iran, and
Pakistan-nations that still execute juvenile offenders. It can take pride in
knowing that it is now in the company of the honorable nations that
abandoned this antiquated practice years ago."
- Dr. William F. Schulz, Executive Director of Amnesty International USA

A special thanks to all Amnesty International activists who contributed to
this victory!

Amnesty International opposes the death penalty in all cases without
exception as it is the ultimate denial of human rights, and we will continue
to demand unconditionally its worldwide abolition.

Learn more about the death penalty:
http://takeaction.amnestyusa.org/ctt.asp?u=639058&l=12086



+++++++++++++++++++++++
You received this message because [email protected] is a member of the
mailing list originating from [email protected]. To unsubscribe from all
mailing lists originating from [email protected], send an email to
[email protected] with "Remove" in the subject line. Alternatively, you
can unsubscribe from this newsletter by going to
http://takeaction.amnestyusa.org/unsubscribe
From [email protected]  Tue Mar  1 21:19:39 2005
From: [email protected] (Joerg Sommer)
Date: Tue Aug 16 12:15:31 2005
Subject: [Deathpenalty]death penalty news --- USA
Message-ID: <[email protected]>

death penalty news

March 1, 2005


USA:

Juvenile execution banned for three reasons - Supreme Court decision uses 
controversial rationale

The Supreme Court declared the execution of anyone under the age of 18 to 
be unconstitutional on Tuesday, effectively ending a practice used in 19 
states. NBC's Justice Correspondent, Pete Williams, explains the 
implications of the ruling.

What was the rationale for the court's decision?

Pete Williams:  The court analyzed the question of whether it is 
constitutional to execute offenders who were 16 or 17 when they committed 
their crimes, under the Eighth Amendment, which bars cruel and unusual 
punishment.

What the court said it had to do is see if there is "an emerging national 
consensus" on the question and it concluded there is.

Some of this is mathematical. The court says that of the states that still 
had the juvenile death penalty, five of them in the past 15 years have 
decided to ban it, through legislation or court decision. In the rest of 
the states, the number of juvenile executions has dropped.

The second reason the court cited is the scientific evidence.

The court said there is widespread agreement among mental health experts 
that people under the age of 18, in general, are less morally responsible 
for their crimes: their minds are less well developed, they're more 
susceptible to peer pressure and they're less culpable, morally, for what 
they do.  The court said there is less evidence that people under 18 are 
irretrievably immoral.  And the decision says, there's a greater 
possibility for these people to improve their characters.

Finally, the court said ? and I think this is a very controversial part of 
the decision, sure to be widely debated ? if you look around at what the 
rest of the world is doing, the United States is the only country left that 
still executes offenders who were 16 and 17 when they committed murderers.

It said look at the number of countries who, within the past five to ten 
years have moved away from it  ? Iran, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and the 
Congo. America is one of the only ones left. And therefore, the Supreme 
Court says the international community has moved away from it as well.  The 
court said that's also a reason the death penalty should be struck down for 
juvenile offenders.

It was a close decision.  What was the minority point of view?

In the 5-4 decision, the dissent was very spirited.  Justice Antonin 
Scalia, writing for the four dissenters ? Scalia, Sandra Day O'Conner, 
Clarence Thomas, and Chief Justice William Rehnquist ? said the court's 
math is all wrong. The reason states don't execute as many juveniles now, 
Scalia said, is that juries are capable of taking youth into account.

Justice Scalia bitterly denounced the majority's reliance on international 
law.  He says it is entirely inappropriate for the Supreme Court to look at 
what the rest of the world is doing, because the Supreme Court doesn't do 
that all the time.  The court, he says, just picks and chooses times when 
it wants to look at international consensus.  It doesn't do it on abortion, 
he says.

He thinks that is not the way for the United States Supreme Court to 
interpret the U.S. Constitution.

What are the implications of the decision?

This will affect about 73 juvenile offenders who are currently on death row 
and it means from now on, no state may seek the death penalty for an 
offender who was 16 or 17 when the crime was committed.

Incidentally, it was 15 years ago when the United States Supreme Court said 
the death penalty is unconstitutional for anyone under 16.  This decision 
dealt only with 17 or 18 year olds.

(source: MSNBC.com. Pete Williams is NBC News' Justice Correspondent and is 
based in Washington, D.C.)

Reply via email to