Oct. 29


PENNSYLVANIA:

Hep C kills activist William Nieves


After spending 6 years on death row for a murder he swore he didn't
commit, William Nieves became an ardent crusader against capital
punishment, traveling the globe to call for an end to the death penalty.

But though he dodged execution by lethal injection, he left prison 5 years
ago this week with another death sentence that was meted out this month.

Nieves, 39, of Feltonville, died Oct. 8 from complications of hepatitis C,
liver disease and other problems - first diagnosed, but never properly
treated, while he was in prison, supporters say.

Nieves' death extinguishes a powerful and eloquent voice against the death
penalty, and raises questions about the adequacy of medical care in state
prisons, friends and observers say.

"He put a human face on the issue of the death penalty and innocent people
on death row and the need for a moratorium on executions," said Jeff
Garis, a former executive director of Pennsylvania Abolitionists United
Against the Death Penalty, who hired Nieves as a community organizer after
his 2000 prison release.

The state Department of Corrections defended prison policies of treating
sick prisoners, and a spokesperson said it was unlikely that Nieves would
have been denied treatment.

The group staged a vigil yesterday outside District Attorney Lynne
Abraham's office to remember Nieves and to protest the death penalty.

Nieves' trip to death row started with drugs. He was an addict who began
selling drugs to support his addiction, he said in a 2001 interview.

In September 1993, he drew scrutiny from city homicide detectives, who
believed that he had fatally shot Eric McAliley on Dec. 22, 1992, outside
McAliley's Hunting Park home. Detectives blamed a dispute over drugs and
money.

Nieves could not remember his whereabouts on the night in question. He
admitted that he had known McAliley, 20, but denied any role in the
murder. He was tried and convicted and sent to death row.

Once imprisoned, he began researching his case and won a new trial based
on ineffective legal counsel.

"His attorney, who had never handled a capital case and was paid a total
of $2,500, presented no witnesses and gave virtually no defense in the
sentencing phase," said Jamie Graham, a board member of the abolitionists
group.

A new lawyer uncovered witnesses describing two black men as the killers,
which led to Nieves' exoneration at a 2000 retrial. Supporters accuse
prosecutors of deliberately hiding exculpatory evidence, a charge that
Abraham's spokeswoman denies.

"The case was handled properly," D.A. spokeswoman Cathie Abookire said.
"He was convicted in the first trial. He was granted a new trial because
he claimed he never got a chance to testify. Yet in the second trial, he
never testified."

At his retrial, prosecutors called witnesses who fingered Nieves as the
killer and introduced incriminating evidence. Still, Nieves was acquitted.

During his imprisonment, Nieves suffered from gallstones and other pains
for which he sought medical treatment.

Instead, he said in a 2001 interview, "The guards just laughed at me and
told me to act like a man. I needed gall-bladder surgery, but they didn't
want to do surgery on a death-row inmate. So, I was in pain for years."

Graham said Nieves learned in 1998, after sneaking a peek at his prison
files during a medical exam, that prison medical staff had diagnosed him
with hepatitis C as early as 1993 but had never informed him or treated
him for his ailment.

Sheila Moore, spokeswoman for the state Department of Corrections, said
she found the scenario unlikely.

"They can sign up for sick call every day if they want," Moore said.

Prisons policy requires inmates to be medically screened within 14 days of
entering the system, Moore said. Afterward, they receive regular checkups
every one to three years, depending on their age.

Moore declined to comment on Nieves' case, citing medical-confidentiality
laws.

(source: Philadelphia Daily News)






OHIO:

Judge refuses to reopen probe of investigator in capital case


A federal judge has rejected a death row inmate's request to re-examine
allegations of misconduct by an investigator who helped convict the inmate
of killing a postmistress.

U.S. District Judge James Carr decided Friday to send the case back to the
6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, finding no basis behind defense
arguments that postal inspector Paul Hartman lied while testifying in John
Spirko's trial in 1984.

Spirko, 59, who maintains his innocence, is to be executed Nov. 15 for the
1982 murder of Betty Jane Mottinger, 48, the postmistress in Elgin in
northwest Ohio. She was abducted and repeatedly stabbed, then wrapped in a
curtain and dumped in a field. Her body was found three weeks later.

Hartman, the state's lead investigator, said during questioning by
Spirko's lawyers that he had never been the subject of a complaint.

In August, a former co-worker wrote a letter to U.S. Chief Postal
Inspector Leroy Heath, informing him about 15 complaints filed by
employees against Hartman.

Carr denied a defense motion asking the court to reconsider Hartman's
credibility, saying Hartman clearly thought he was being asked whether he
had been cited in a formal agency complaint.

A defense attorney said Spirko would appeal.

Carr also denied a defense request for a new trial, saying there was no
reason to believe that investigators hid evidence from the defense.

The Ohio Parole Board earlier this month recommended by a 6-3 vote that
Gov. Bob Taft deny Spirko clemency, repeating its previous decision. It
was the 1st time since Ohio resumed executions in 1999 that a condemned
inmate has received a second clemency hearing.

(source : Associated Press)

****************

Spirko appeal on trial witness denied


A federal judge yesterday rejected a motion from death-row inmate John
Spirko in a bid to reopen a new avenue of appeals on his conviction for
the murder of a rural Van Wert County postmaster.

U.S. District Judge James Carr denied a motion from Spirko to reconsider
the credibility of a retired postal inspector whose testimony was used to
convict Spirko in the August, 1982, slaying of Betty Jane Mottinger.

Spirko, 59, is scheduled to die Nov. 15 for the abduction and murder of
the 48-year-old woman, who was the postmaster at the tiny village of
Elgin, Ohio.

She was kidnapped from the rural post office and found nearly 6 weeks
later. She was stabbed more than a dozen times.

The motion was based on an Aug. 31 letter from Gregory Duerr, an inspector
in Cleveland, to U.S. Chief Postal Inspector Leroy Heath, informing him
that 15 complaints were filed by employees against Postal Inspector Paul
Hartman, a key witness at the 1984 trial.

The letter surfaced after Judge Carr decided against Spirko in the appeal
of the court's decision in 2000 that upheld Spirko's conviction and death
sentence.

"We are disappointed with the decision on the motion. We continue to
maintain that John Spirko is innocent of the crime," said Spirko's
Washington attorney, Alvin Dunn.

The Ohio Parole Board has twice denied clemency for Spirko, most recently
on Oct. 19 when the credibility of Mr. Hartman was challenged. The retired
postal inspector's interviews with Spirko were key in obtaining the
conviction.

Mr. Dunn said an appeal of Judge Carr's denial of the motion likely would
be made to the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

(source: Toledo Blade)

******************

Judge rejects Spirko's argument -- Inmate's execution date nears


A federal judge in Toledo has refused to revisit the case of death-row
inmate John Spirko, finding no reason to further investigate complaints by
former co-workers about the investigator who helped win Spirko's 1984
murder conviction.

With just over 2 weeks to go until Spirko's scheduled execution, the case
returns to the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

In a Friday ruling, U.S. District Judge James Carr rejected arguments that
retired Postal Inspector Paul Hartman lied under oath during questioning
by Spirko's lawyers when he said he had never been the subject of a
complaint. Carr said Hartman clearly thought he was being asked whether he
had been named in a formal agency complaint.

The judge said Hartman's fellow postal inspectors and employees had
complained about his temperament and behavior as a supervisor in 2000.
Hartman disputed the complaints, but decided to retire earlier than
planned. Carr privately reviewed government records about the complaints
and found nothing relating to the Spirko investigation, prosecution or
conviction.

This was Carr's second Spirko ruling in 2 months. In early September, he
rejected arguments that the state used fraud to thwart the inmate's
earlier appeal.

Spirko's lawyers were appealing that decision when they received a letter
by a former Hartman co-worker raising questions about his integrity and
professionalism -- and whether Spirko was guilty of murder.

That letter prompted Spirko's lawyers to seek relief from Carr.

Lawyers for Spirko and the state subsequently interviewed Hartman's former
co-worker. But he offered no specific information about improper action by
Hartman in the Spirko case.

Now that Carr has ruled, the underlying case returns to the appeals court.
Lawyers for Ohio Attorney General Jim Petro have denied the fraud
allegations.

(source: Plain Dealer)






KANSAS:

Judge imposes death penalty, then 'Hard 50' -- just in case


Ellawese Chandler, the mother of murder victim Gloria Jones, used to
oppose the death penalty.

On Friday, Chandler told Phillip D. Cheatham, the man who prosecutors said
killed her daughter when he shot her 8 times, that she would gladly give
him the lethal injection at his execution.

Chandler won't get to execute Cheatham, but the state of Kansas will --
under the sentence set forth Friday by Shawnee County District Judge
Matthew Dowd. The death penalty is for killing Annette Roberson on Dec.
13, 2003, at a duplex at 2718 S.E. Colorado. Cheatham was sentenced to a
"Hard 50" for killing Jones.

No date has been scheduled for Cheatham's execution. The death penalty was
struck down by the Kansas Supreme Court in December 2004, and the U.S.
Supreme Court is reviewing whether the state's death penalty is
constitutional. According to Kansas law, the method of execution is lethal
injection.

Calling the slayings a "vicious, cold-blooded series of murders," Dowd
said if ever there was a crime when the death penalty should apply, "this
is it." As a backup sentence in case the U.S. Supreme Court doesn't
reverse the state court, Dowd gave Cheatham consecutive sentences totaling
78 years and 1 month.

"The defendant should not ever see the light of day," Dowd said.

Prosecutors were correct in asking the court to impose consecutive rather
than concurrent sentences because the crimes were separate offenses
against separate victims, Dowd said. To make the sentences concurrent
would minimize the crimes, he said.

If the U.S. Supreme Court doesn't reverse the Kansas Supreme Court's
decision, Cheatham would return to court to be resentenced on the capital
murder count to another Hard 50, District Attorney Robert Hecht said in a
statement Friday.

Jurors also convicted Cheatham of attempted first-degree murder,
aggravated battery and criminal possession of a firearm in the shooting of
Annetta Thomas, who survived.

Before he was sentenced, Cheatham, who wore a dark suit, white shirt and
tie, handcuffs and leg irons, stood to express condolences to the victims
and their families.

**

Phillip D. Cheatham's Sentence

Capital murder of Annette Roberson: Death

1st-degree premeditated murder of Gloria Jones: 50 years without parole

Attempted premeditated 1st-degree murder of Annetta Thomas: 23 years and 9
months, the maximum

Aggravated battery of Thomas: 3 years and 7 months

Criminal possession of a weapon: 9 months

Total prison time: 78 years and 1 month

**

"I expect to be vindicated, and the truth will come out," said Cheatham,
whose defense attorney had insisted his client was en route to Chicago
when the 3 women were shot.

As for the death penalty, "if that's what the court chooses to sentence
me, that's God's will," Cheatham said.

In September, Cheatham signed a letter to Dowd, "King Phil D. Cheatham."

Lynda Perry-Grigsby, Cheatham's mother, insisted her son was innocent and
asked for time until information surfaces that would acquit him.

Dennis Hawver, Cheatham's attorney, questioned the veracity of the
testimony of Thomas, the only survivor of the bloody attack but who has
been convicted of forgery. Simply because the jury convicted Cheatham
doesn't mean he committed the crimes, Hawver said.

Thomas, who survived 19 bullet wounds to testify that Cheatham was one of
2 gunmen who shot the three women, urged Dowd to sentence Cheatham to
death.

"Mr. Cheatham showed no mercy to me or my friends," said Thomas, who walks
slowly with an obvious limp.

Deputy District Attorney David Debenham made impassioned arguments seeking
the death penalty and long sentences for the other crimes.

"If not Phillip Cheatham, who would (the death penalty) apply to?"
Debenham said. "There is no reason for this individual to walk in
civilized society again."

After Debenham's remarks, Hawver was asked whether he had any response.

"It would be nice if we had the right man," Hawver said.

"The jury believed we have the right man, and I do also," Dowd said.

Cheatham also was convicted of voluntary manslaughter in 1995 for killing
Robert Ford in Kansas City, Kan.

Outside court, Chandler said the death penalty was what she wanted for
Cheatham.

"He's dangerous to society. He's taken three lives. How many more does he
have to take before they put him to sleep?" she said.

Cheatham's lack of remorse changed her view of capital punishment, she
said.

Christopher Davis, a brother of Jones, said the death penalty was "very
much appropriate" for Cheatham. He said he wished he could activate the
lethal injection that would execute him. Davis said he planned to travel
from his home in Denver to witness the execution.

"It will be a glorious day. I wish he could die like my sister did,
suffering," Davis said.

After Cheatham had been sentenced, Hawver asked the judge precisely how
long his client had been sentenced to prison.

"He'll have to add it up. He'll have plenty of time to do that," Dowd told
Hawver, then left the courtroom.

(source: Topeka Capital-Journal)






MISSOURI:

Lawyers for girls' killer appeals to Supreme Court----Lawyers for girls'
killer appeal to high court


In a bid to delay the execution of the final man on death row for the 1991
murder of two young women at the old Chain of Rocks Bridge, lawyers for
Reginald Clemons announced Friday that they have appealed the case again
to the U.S. Supreme Court.

The Missouri Attorney General's Office is within weeks of asking the
Missouri Supreme Court for an execution date for Clemons, spokesman Scott
Holste said.

In 1993, after 3 hours of deliberation, a St. Louis jury convicted Clemons
of 2 counts of 1st-degree murder for the deaths of Julie and Robin Kerry.
Prosecutors said Clemons and two other men raped the girls before pushing
them off the then-unused bridge to their deaths in the Mississippi River.
The victims' cousin, Tom Cummins, also was forced to jump but survived.

One of the convicted killers, Marlin Gray, was executed Wednesday. The
Missouri Supreme Court reduced Antonio Richardson's death sentence to life
in prison, finding he should have been sentenced by a jury and not a
judge.

An additional defendant, Daniel Winfrey, 15 at the time of the murders,
confessed a role in the crime, pleaded guilty and testified against the
others in exchange for a 30-year prison sentence.

Clemons has appealed his conviction on a number of grounds, but recent
appeals have focused on the selection of jurors for the trial.

In 2002, U.S. District Judge Catherine Perry said the trial judge should
not have excluded 6 prospective jurors who expressed reservations about
imposing the death penalty. Perry said prosecutor Nels Moss improperly
posed a question to the jurors.

Perry's ruling threw out the death penalty against Clemons, but it was
reinstated by the 8th U.S. Court of Appeals. That court said that Perry
was wrong and should have deferred to the judgment of the state courts.

On Oct. 3, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to review Clemons' case.

Holste said Clemons' new appeal to the high court is not expected to delay
setting an execution date, unless the court agrees to review the case.

The new appeal says the U.S. Supreme Court is considering issues in 2
other cases that are similar to those Clemons has raised and that his
execution should be delayed until the other cases are heard.

After appellate courts affirm a prisoner's death sentence, the attorney
general's office can petition for an execution date. Before 2002, those
dates were set within weeks of receiving the petition, but the pace
slowed.

The petition seeking a date for Gray was filed more than 2 years before
the court set a date.

Courts have rejected Clemons' other appeals, including claims that Moss
committed misconduct during the trial, that there was not enough evidence
to convict Clemons of 1st-degree murder and that his confession was
coerced by a police beating.

Gray and Cummins also claimed to have been beaten into making
incriminating statements.

Police reached a $150,000 settlement of a civil suit filed by Cummins, who
initially was a suspect before a flashlight found on the bridge led
investigators to Clemons and the others.

(source: St. Louis Post-Dispatch)






CALIFORNIA:

For Some, Redemption of Killer Rings Hollow


Gene Hetzel is aware that death row inmate Stanley "Tookie" Williams has
written books and been the subject of a movie. Hetzel even heard talk of a
Nobel Prize nomination some years ago. And he knows that influential
people are lobbying to win him clemency.

But for Hetzel, these details are eclipsed by older, clearer memories he
links to Williams: the smell of garlic hovering on a cold morning over 3
people crumpled in a motel living room, their bodies blown apart by
gunfire.

Williams was convicted of these 1979 murders and one other, and is
scheduled to be executed Dec. 13. An admitted former gang leader, he has
said he changed his outlook in prison, though he has maintained that he
didn't commit these murders.

But Hetzel, 65, a retired homicide detective who investigated Williams,
said he would never be convinced - not by Williams' contentions that he is
innocent, not by his professed change of heart that has drawn so many
local and international religious leaders and other opponents of the death
penalty to his defense.

"I don't know," Hetzel said. "I try to rationalize this every time I hear
about it, and I don't know. I just don't know."

Hetzel belongs to a small cadre of skeptics - victims' loved ones and
police officers, mostly - who recall a time before the world had heard of
Tookie Williams. They remember how little was said, over the years, of
Albert Lewis Owens, a clerk at a 7-Eleven in Pico Rivera, and the Yang
family, who ran a motel on Vermont Avenue. Their deaths hardly made the
papers.

Williams, 51, was convicted of killing four people in 2 robberies in 1979.
The 1st crime took place Feb. 28, when Owens, a father of 2 working the
night shift at the 7-Eleven, was shotgunned twice in the back at close
range.

The 2nd crime occurred 11 days later, after robbers crashed through the
office door of the Brookhaven Motel, on Vermont Avenue just south of
Century Boulevard, court documents said. Shot were motel owners Yen-I
Yang, 65; Tsai-Shai Chen Yang, 62; and their daughter Yu-Chin Yang Lin,
42, according to coroner's officials.

Owens' stepmother, Lora Owens, said she was outraged that Williams' story
of redemption (he was the subject of a television movie of that name) had
eclipsed the story of Albert, a beloved son and father who served in the
Army.

Albert was slim, 5 foot 9, with red hair, freckles and blue eyes, she
said, adding that he was outgoing and "liked to do anything that was
physical, anything manly."

She has one memory that sticks with her. It's just a random moment, a
sunny afternoon: Albert is on the front lawn, showing off for the
neighbors, doing push-ups with one hand. The neighbors laugh. His young
stepbrothers watch, awestruck; they worshiped Albert. Lora Owens recalls
chiding her stepson: "Pretty good! Now can you use those muscles to push
the lawnmower?"

He later married, had two daughters and settled in Whittier. The marriage
ended in divorce. At 26, Owens, unsteadied by the breakup, "was trying to
figure things out," Lora Owens said.

He had always had a practical, willing attitude about work, and he wasn't
above a job as a night clerk at 7-Eleven. Owens laughed off his
stepmother's worries. "I need the money," she recalled him saying.

It was 4 a.m. when the 4 robbers came in.

One of them took Albert into a storeroom and made him kneel or lie down,
according to police accounts and court documents. He was shot twice in the
back at close range with a 12-gauge shotgun. A customer found his body
later, according to press accounts.

Afterward, an accomplice of Williams who turned informant said Williams
bragged that he "blew some white guy away, shot him in the back, for $63,"
according to court documents.

Charles and Lora Owens were notified by phone. Charles' health went
downhill after that. On his deathbed in 1995, Albert's father turned to
his wife and asked, "You won't forget Albert, will you?"

When the television movie got Albert's name wrong, calling him "Alvin,"
Lora Owens tracked down the producers and complained. They apologized and
changed it, she said.

She favors the execution and views Williams' fame as a betrayal. She tells
people who disagree that they don't know the agony of the loss.

"Albert was so vibrant and alive. Then, in the next minute, he was dead,"
she said.

The triple slaying had the same style as the Owens murder. Relatives of
the victims could not be reached for comment, but others who were there
say they won't forget it.

The Yangs were Taiwanese, according to police. They owned the Brookhaven
Motel. Daughter Yu-Chin Lin had just joined them from Taiwan.

Sgt. David Longshore, a Los Angeles County sheriff's detective, knew the
name "Barefoot Tookie" Williams at the time, in the loose way that police
track local gang members thought to be shot-callers and shooters in the
areas where they work.

Just before dawn, the patrol supervisor got a call about a shooting. The
neighborhood was notorious for crime. Sometimes, Longshore simply parked
there to wait for crimes to happen.

On this night, he got to the motel and found a swarm of emergency workers
in the family's tiny living space adjoining the office.

The father lay on the couch. The mother and daughter were on the floor.
"They were crumpled together, as if cowering," Longshore recalled. There
was gore. Twelve-gauge shotgun blasts, fired at close range, had ripped
large holes in the victims' bodies. Yu-Chin Lin had been shot in the face.
Yen-I and Tsai-Shai Yang were shot twice in their torsos. Mother and
daughter were still alive. They died shortly after at hospitals.

Longshore remembers noticing the parents' age - too elderly, he thought,
to pose a threat. "I couldn't understand it," he said.

Hetzel, the sheriff's homicide detective who arrived shortly after,
remembered noting that the victims were strikingly small. The room smelled
of their cooking, a garlicky scent grotesquely at odds with the scene, he
recalled. For some reason, the furniture was in disorder. Hetzel began
looking for shell casings and realized that the killers had pushed the
chairs aside to collect them so they wouldn't be used as evidence. "To
execute them, then have the calmness to collect the empty shell casings,"
said Hetzel, now retired and living out of state. "It just chills me."

One casing had been left behind. Investigators found it, Hetzel said,
adding that it was later connected to the murder weapon, a sawed-off
shotgun. The Los Angeles Times ran a single paragraph on the murders, 1 of
4 homicide cases reported that day.

Williams was arrested some time later during a traffic stop, said
Sheriff's Lt. Dave Furmanski. When Hetzel later interviewed Williams, the
notorious Crip was cool and businesslike, taking control of the interview,
telling investigators nothing, requesting cookies and coffee.

Hetzel was struck by Williams' calm demeanor and massive size. He
remembered the victims' bodies. "He had got those little people
terrified," he recalled thinking. "Then he had to execute them. He had
control of the situation. He had the money. Why?"

Williams' advocates do not contest the horror of the crimes, but rather,
the validity of the case against Williams.

"No one is disputing there [are] 4 tragic deaths there. It is very, very
sad.. There is enormous sympathy here," said Verna Wefald, one of
Williams' attorneys. But, she said, "the evidence against Mr. Williams is
essentially weak and was coming from witnesses with sordid backgrounds who
have incentive to lie to save themselves."

Since he was convicted, Wefald and others note, Williams has written
anti-gang children's books and has become a voice against gang violence.

All 3 officers, however, said Williams' redemption story is just like many
claims of religious epiphanies they've heard from prisoners over the
years.

"People are too gullible," Longshore said. "Everyone wants a happy
ending."

(Los Angeles Times)

********************

Death penalty foes call for moratorium in California


A group of death penalty opponents gathered Saturday to call for a
moratorium on all executions in California and urged Gov. Arnold
Schwarzenegger to grant clemency to Stanley "Tookie" Williams.

"Voices From Death Row," a national speaking tour sponsored by the
Campaign to End the Death Penalty, drew about 80 supporters to East Los
Angeles College. The event featured Darby Tillis, a former Illinois death
row inmate who was later exonerated.

The group expressed outrage at the Dec. 13 execution date for Williams,
co-founder of the Crips street gang.

Williams, 51, was sentenced to death for fatally shooting Albert Owens, a
Whittier convenience store worker, and killing two Los Angeles motel
owners and their daughter with a shotgun during a robbery, both in 1979.

He has maintained his innocence, and supporters believe Williams did not
get a fair trial.

Since being sentenced to death, Williams has written a series of
children's books in his effort to curtail youth gang violence. He has been
nominated five times for a Nobel Peace Prize and four times for a Nobel
Prize in literature.

In August, Williams received a President's Call to Service Award for his
good deeds on death row, complete with a letter from President Bush
praising him for demonstrating "the outstanding character of America."

"His case is really important because he represents individual
redemption," said Dana Blanchard with the Los Angeles chapter of Campaign
to End the Death Penalty. "While in prison he's become one of the leading
voices against gang violence."

Schwarzenegger told The Associated Press this week he will be reviewing
Williams' request for clemency and hasn't ruled anything out.

Tillis and another man were tried 5 times for 2 murders in a 1977 Chicago
robbery and were acquitted in 1987 after 9 years in prison.

On Saturday, Tillis, 62, called it a "flawed and failed system" that
resulted in his time on death row.

"I will never be normal," Tillis said. "I'm not free of death row."

"Voices from Death Row" included stops earlier this month in Chicago, New
York and Washington, D.C.

ON THE NET

http://www.savetookie.com

http://www.nodeathpenalty.org

(source: Associated Press)



Reply via email to