March 3


TEXAS:

Bryan man indicted in 2003 raid


A Bryan man whose 2 sons were convicted in connection with a deadly 2003
raid on the home of a College Station rap producer was indicted Thursday
on a capital murder charge.

Willie Davis' 2 sons - Chad and Trey Davis - were accused of hiring a trio
of Georgia gunmen to confront Tommy Andrade after he stole $100,000 in
money or drugs from the brothers. Andrade and one of the gunmen were
killed in the encounter.

The eldest Davis, 66, originally was charged with tampering with evidence
after police said he drove the 2 surviving gunmen back to Georgia, where
their multiple gunshot wounds were treated by an off-duty nurse.

Brazos County Sheriff Chris Kirk said Thursday that recent investigative
findings led prosecutors to seek a higher charge. He declined to
elaborate.

Willie Davis could have faced up to 10 years in prison for the tampering
charge. Capital murder is punishable by life in prison or the death
penalty.

Chad Davis was sentenced last year to life in prison after being convicted
of capital murder. Trey Davis, also originally charged with capital
murder, was sentenced earlier this year to 40 years in prison for burglary
of a habitation and robbery as part of a plea agreement.

Thomas Parent, considered to be a middleman who recruited the gunmen, was
sentenced last month to 35 years in prison for engaging in organized
criminal activity and burglary. Gunman Bradley Padrick has been sentenced
to 40 years in prison. Boris "Short Fat" Mogilevich, thought to be the
other surviving gunman, has not been captured.

Willie Davis, arrested Thursday on the capital murder charge, was among
more than 3 dozen people indicted by a Brazos County grand jury. An
indictment is not an indication of guilt, but rather that the grand jury
shows there was enough evidence to warrant a trial.

(source: The Bryan-College Station Eagle)

************

Father denies abuse in Clint Young hearing


Convicted double murderer Clint Young's appellate hearing in 238th
District Court Thursday raised questions of sexual abuse by his father,
William Young Jr. of Irving, who denied the accusations.

Cross-examined by defense attorney Ori White of Fort Stockton, the
54-year-old welder denied having ever abused his youngest son, his 2 older
sons, two daughters or a grandson.

"That is not true," Young said. "It was fabricated."

However, he acknowledged being arrested in the mid-1990s in North Carolina
for hitting Clint Young in the face and upper torso. "He had told me to
'shut up, (pejorative),' and I popped him up beside the jaw," William
Young said.

"I never hit him with a 2-by-4 and never hit him in the nose with a belt
buckle."

The sexual issue was raised by affidavits signed last April in Longview by
31-year-old Dano Young and his common law wife Crystal Deshotel of
Alvarado; but Dano Young told Judge John Hyde and prosecutors Ralph Petty
and Eric Kalenak he was first manipulated for two days with crack cocaine
and liquor by Austin mitigation specialist Lisa Milstein.

"I lied to her so she would buy me drugs," Dano Young said, noting
Milstein was working for Austin lawyer Gary Taylor, who been appointed to
handle Clint Young's appeal. "It was wrong for me to lie, but I'm here to
straighten it out.

"My dad is not a bad man. He has worked hard all his life and has never
laid a hand on us other than whipping our butts when we deserved it."

When asked by White if Milstein knew he was lying or believed he was
truthful, Dano Young said, "Right off, she was trying to make Dad look
like a child molester."

Dino Young, 32, of Irving then testified Milstein contacted him when he
was an inmate at Upshur County Jail in Gilmer. "I told her Dad didn't
sexually abuse us and he never has," the defendant's elder brother said.

"Dano visited me later and said they drove around and she was buying crack
and they were smoking it."

Both of Clint Young's brothers acknowledged having served state
penitentiary terms.

With more than a dozen spectators present during the hearing's 2nd day,
the most poignant moment came when one of the death row inmate's sisters,
Christy Jetton of Winnsboro, became too emotional to testify. She had not
seen her brother since he was convicted on 2 counts of capital murder and
given the death penalty in April 2003.

Young killed Doyle Douglas of Ore City near Longview and Samuel Petrey of
Eastland near Midland during a November 2001 carjacking spree.

Jetton, a longhaired brunette, looked at her 22-year-old brother at the
defense table and began to cry. Young also lowered his shaven head and
wept.

His other sister, Sharon Gentry of Vivian, La., has not been called.

"Are you worried about your brother?" White asked Jetton.

Unable to answer, she was excused and the 1st state's witness, Texas
Ranger David Hullum of Eastland, testified about finding evidence of
Douglas' death in the victim's white 1995 Pontiac 2-door car on an
Eastland County oil lease on Nov. 26, 2001.

"I found 2 spent .22-caliber shell casings and five live rounds on the
floor," said Hullum.

Testimony was scheduled to continue today and conclude this afternoon,
when Hyde could either rule on White's motion to grant Young a new trial
or take the case under advisement.

(source: Midland Reporter-Telegram)






USA:

Executions wrong


Capital punishment is a cruel, unjust and an expensive way to kill someone
legally. It's wrong. Let's say someone from your family was put on death
row; would you want them dead or alive? I would say alive.

I know no one likes to pay taxes. To keep someone on death row costs about
$53,000 a year, money that comes from state taxes. If there are 5 people
on death row a year, that costs taxpayers about $265,000. That's a lot of
money.

Constant appeals by lawyers can mean a person on death row could stay
there for 10, 20 or even 30 years. Some people have even gone before a
judge or jury more than 60 times. That takes up a lot of court time and
money.

However, until our country comes up with a fair, unbiased, colorblind and
balanced system for dealing with capital crimes, I'd rather save the money
and save a life.

JULIE KNODT - Mount Laurel

(source: Letter to the Editor, Cherry Hill Courier Post)

**********************

Lives set adrift by sudden freedom----Wrongly convicted men share their
post-release stories


After "Exonerated" and the endless parade of cable TV shows about people
who were wrongly imprisoned and later set free on the basis of DNA
evidence comes "After Innocence," a documentary focusing on what happens
to them afterward.

An outgrowth of the Innocence Project, the nonprofit legal collective put
together by former O.J. Simpson Dream Teamer Barry Scheck and Peter
Neufeld, "After Innocence" examines the post-prison experiences of 7 men,
any of whose stories could be the stuff of an inspired-by-a-true-story
drama.

The most striking of them is probably Nick Yarris, who spent 23 years on
death row and was the 140th person to escape execution through
post-conviction DNA testing.

Yarris, who fits the stereotype of the bulked-up, disciplined and
philosophical prison survivor, spent years in solitary confinement, but he
appears more fortunate than most.

He channeled his righteous indignation into the inspirational tone of a
motivational speaker and aids those who might be tempted to give up hope.
Yet when he visits the neighborhood in which he grew up, his iron-man pose
dissolves: "I'm a ghost in my own life," he tells the camera.

Still, he seems to have found a place for himself, which cannot be said
for the sad-eyed Dennis Maher, who was released after 19 years in jail. He
returns to his childhood home to live with his parents, sleeping on a
fold-out couch. It is exceedingly difficult to watch him attempt to enjoy
a family birthday party more appropriate for the person he was 2 decades
before.

One of the major points made in "Exonerated" is that wrongful convictions
are in some cases secured by prosecutors determined to make or clear a
case, even if it contains contradictions. Other times, they have been the
result of sincere eyewitness testimony.

One seemingly open-and shut case was that of college student Jennifer
Thompson-Canino, who, as she was being brutally raped, memorized the
features of the man assaulting her. On her testimony, Ronald Cotton was
given a life sentence and served 11 years before another man's confession
to the crime was confirmed by DNA testing. Today, Thompson-Canino speaks
publicly to law enforcement and advocacy groups about the problem of
misidentification, often in tandem with Cotton. The 2 have become friends.

Director Jessica Sanders has made a more even-handed film than
"Exonerated," which, powerful and effective as it was, tended to demonize
law enforcement. Nevertheless, this is an advocacy film, one that argues
that the wrongfully convicted deserve compensation or, at least,
assistance in re-entering society, both psychologically and
professionally.

"After Innocence" is, without making it overly obvious, anti-death penalty
on the grounds that a just society cannot afford to make any mistakes that
we cannot attempt to rectify.

(source: Detroit Free Press)






DELAWARE:

'Good riddance' Capano----Fahey's brother likely sees killer for final
time in court as convict gets life in prison


While he still has some federal appeal options left, there was a sense of
finality about convicted killer Thomas J. Capano's appearance Thursday at
the New Castle County Courthouse.

It marked the end of Capano's state appeals, and his trip to Wilmington
may have been one of the last times he'll ever leave the walls of a
prison.

It also marked the end of Capano's status as a death row inmate. In
January, the Delaware Supreme Court upheld his conviction for the 1996
murder of Anne Marie Fahey but overturned his death sentence.

On Thursday, Superior Court Judge T. Henley Graves had only 1 option: He
made the state Supreme Court's ruling official, sentencing Capano to life
in prison without possibility of probation or parole.

It took about two minutes, and it made Capano just "another lifer, just a
dime a dozen" in the words of Fahey's brother, Robert.

U.S. Attorney Colm F. Connolly, who prosecuted Capano and sat in on
Thursday's proceeding, called it "the beginning of the end."

Capano filed a federal appeal in January, but legal experts familiar with
the case have said that petition does not have much of a chance of
overturning Capano's murder conviction now that he's no longer on death
row. He has to prove not only that state courts were wrong, but also that
Delaware judges committed an "unreasonable" error.

During the federal appeals process generally, a defendant does not appear
at proceedings.

"This could very well be the last time he'll be in a courtroom," said
assistant U.S. attorney Ferris W. Wharton, who prosecuted Capano with
Connolly and remains assigned to the case.

Len Sosnov, a professor at Widener University School of Law, agreed. "The
odds are he'll never see a courtroom as part of his federal habeas
[action]," Sosnov said.

"Good riddance," said Kevin Fahey, another of Anne Marie's brothers, as he
left court Thursday.

Capano, 56, with his feet shackled and dressed in an orange prison
jumpsuit, looked older and overweight. Once clean-shaven, he wore a wispy
white beard. He didn't scan the courtroom for friendly faces, and there
were apparently none to be seen.

Fahey's friends and family filled the front row and the rest of the 40 or
so people in the room appeared to be members of the media or court
personnel.

Connolly said it was clear from Capano's appearance that he has paid a
price, and continues to pay a price, "for what he did June 27, 1996."

Kathleen Fahey-Hosey, the victim's sister, said Capano "looks awful. But
that is OK with me."

Capano's attorney, Joseph M. Bernstein, would not discuss his client's
well-being, but said "prison life isn't conducive to good heath." He said
Capano's health concerns are treated like everyone else's in prison.

Capano only said two words in court -- "Yes sir" -- when Graves asked
whether he was declining his opportunity to address the court. He didn't
express any remorse for murdering Fahey, his former lover, and dumping her
body at sea, nor did he profess his innocence.

Bernstein told Graves that the court had no discretion in the sentence, so
"from the defense side, we have nothing to add."

Wharton told Graves that although Capano avoided a death sentence, he will
not avoid dying behind bars, "which is as it should be."

Graves then condemned Capano to live the rest of his days in prison, and
expressed a hope that the sentence "would bring, or start to bring, some
closure to the family and friends of Ms. Fahey."

Connolly said he hopes Capano is kept in solitary confinement, where he
has been held since he was sentenced to death, to prevent him from
mingling with other prisoners and finding someone to threaten or harm
people who testified against him at trial.

Fahey-Hosey said outside court that true closure probably will happen for
her family only when Capano is dead and they can stop visiting courthouses
to ensure Anne Marie gets justice.

Not that the Faheys are upset that Delaware Attorney General Carl C.
Danberg decided not to pursue the death penalty a second time. Fahey-Hosey
said earlier she did not want to have to go through the lengthy and
painful court proceeding that would be needed. But, she said, it is
getting better -- every year the family has to go to court less and less
-- and they are all moving toward a resolution.

"Based on how he looked today, that might not be that long," she said.
"The sooner, the better."

WHAT'S NEXT:

Capano has filed a petition in U.S. District Court in Wilmington seeking
to overturn his murder conviction, alleging mistakes by the judge and
ineffective counsel by his attorneys. District Judge Kent A. Jordan is
reviewing it.

(source: The News Journal )






CALIFORNIA:

S.C. Upholds Death Sentence in Beverlywood Murder


The California Supreme Court yesterday narrowly upheld the death sentence
imposed on a construction worker convicted of fatally stabbing an
emergency-room nurse in her Beverlywood home.

In a 4-3 decision, the justices rejected the contention that there was
insufficient evidence that Jose Francisco Guerra attempted to rape
Kathleen Powell. Such evidence was essential to Guerra's 1st degree murder
conviction and to the special-circumstance finding, as Los Angeles
Superior Court Judge Leslie W. Light, who has since retired, threw out
allegations of premeditation, lying-in-wait, and burglary before the case
went to the jury.

Guerra, who was doing renovation work on the house next to Powell's prior
to the 1990 murder, was picked up for questioning after his fingerprints
were found in the victim's blood. Under interrogation, he first denied
being in the house, then when told that the prints were discovered, said
he was drunk and might have gone in and found the victim already lying
dead.

Fellow construction workers, however, testified that Guerra frequently
visited Powell, who occasionally gave the construction workers food and
spoke with them in order to practice her Spanish. Powell, they said, had
complained that he came in to her house all of the time.

They also testified that Guerra had talked and used gestures suggesting he
was interested in Powell sexually, and that they had tried to explain to
him that she had no romantic interest in him and that he should stay away
from her house.

Guerra testified that he stayed behind after work on the day of the
killing because he intended to swim in the pool at the house that he and
his co-workers were remodeling. He said he heard screaming next door, ran
over to the house, and saw Powell lying in blood and briefly attempted to
lift her.

He did not report the crime because he was scared and did not know how to
call 911. He lied to the police, he said, because he was afraid they would
beat him, which he said was a common occurrence in his native Guatemala.

While there was no direct evidence that he sexually assaulted her,
prosecutors argued that his expressed sexual desires and his persistent
entry into her house, combined with the facts that Guerra had stayed
behind after his co-workers left the job site on the day of the killing
and that the victims breasts had been poked several times and slashed
before she was killed, was enough to prove an attempted rape Light ruled
that there was enough evidence of a rape attempt to send the felony
1st-degree murder charge and the special circumstance allegation to the
jury.

Justice Ming Chin, writing for the high court, agreed.

The justice cited People v. Holloway (2004) 33 Cal.4th 96, in which the
court held that where the defendant entered the victims residence and
attacked her, intent to rape could be inferred, despite a lack of physical
evidence of a sexual assault, from other physical evidence. The court in
that case relied on the condition of the victim's body and evidence of the
defendant's attempted rape of the victim's sister in holding the evidence
sufficient.

Chief Justice Ronald M. George and Justices Joyce L. Kennard and Marvin
Baxter joined in Chins opinion.

Justice Kathryn M. Werdegar, joined by Justice Carlos Moreno and Presiding
Court of Appeal Justice Arthur Gilbert of this districts Div. Six, sitting
on assignment, dissented.

While Guerra was clearly guilty of murder, Werdegar wrote, the evidence of
intent to rape was much weaker than in Holloway.

"In the present case, the evidence shows neither disrobement, nor
indications of bondage, nor the recent or contemporaneous attempt to rape
another victim....In determining the nature of Powell's wounds is
substantial evidence that defendant killed her in the commission of rape
or attempted rape, the majority extends Holloway beyond what the opinion
will support," the dissenting jurist argued.

The case is People v. Guerra, 06 S.O.S. 1101.

(source: Metropolitan News-Enterprise)






NORTH CAROLINA:

Judge hears argument in lawsuit against executions


In Raleigh, a judge says a Cary man who sued the state on grounds that
executions are offensive to Christians has until Monday to file more
information before a decision is made on the lawsuit.

Superior Court Judge Robert Hobgood ruled yesterday that death penalty
opponent Jim French and the state have until 5 p-m on Monday to file any
additional information with the court before he issues a decision.

French's lawsuit said state executions violate his religious freedom, but
he never made that argument during the 30-minute hearing yesterday. He
spent his 30 minutes challenging the statutes that govern executions.

Hobgood's decision could influence the execution of Patrick Lane Moody,
who's scheduled to die March 17th for the 1994 murder of Donnie Ray
Robbins in Davidson County.

An attorney for the state argued that French lacks standing to file the
lawsuit.


NEW JERSEY:

Multiple killer gets life in prison -- Nurse, 46, says he injected 40 of
his patients


A nurse who killed at least 29 patients was sent to prison on Thursday for
the rest of his life after his victims' loved ones angrily branded him
"garbage" and a "monster" who ruined lives and shattered their faith in
the medical profession.

Charles Cullen - one of the most prolific killers the U.S. health care
industry has ever seen - escaped the death penalty after making a deal
with prosecutors to tell them which patients he killed with hard-to-detect
drug injections.

He received 11 consecutive life terms at a tense hearing in which he came
face-to-face with his victims' families for the 1st time.

"You betrayed the ancient foundations of the healing professions,"
Superior Court Judge Paul Armstrong said as Cullen stood motionless, his
eyes closed.

Cullen, 46, pleaded guilty to murdering 22 people in New Jersey and trying
to kill 4 others. He will be sentenced later for 7 murders and 3 attempted
murders in Pennsylvania.

Cullen has claimed to have killed up to 40 people during a career that
spanned 16 years and 10 nursing homes and hospitals.

He was fired from 5 nursing jobs and resigned from 2 others amid questions
about his practices. But he always managed to find another job, in part
because hospitals did not share their suspicions for fear of being sued.

New Jersey lawmakers have since passed legislation protecting nursing
homes and hospitals from legal action when reporting disciplinary actions
taken against employees.

About 60 relatives of the victims attended the sentencing. Cullen, wearing
a sweater over an open-collar shirt, sat quietly during much of the
hearing. As the family members spoke, he kept his eyes closed, frustrating
some of the relatives.

"In case he forgot what my mother looked like, look into my eyes now,"
said Richard J. Stoecker, whose mother was murdered in 2003.

Cullen declined to make a statement, disappointing families who had hoped
to hear him explain why he committed the crimes.

John Shanagher, whose father was murdered, said his family "will never
feel safe in a hospital again. We will never feel we can trust the medical
profession again."

Dolores Stasienko of Kitty Hawk, N.C., said Cullen "will always be known
as the monster." She held a photo of her father, Giacomino "Jack" Toto,
89, who was murdered in 2003.

"After today, we will finally toss aside his name and face, like the
garbage he is," said Emily Stoecker, whose mother, Eleanor, was killed.

Other relatives talked of how the killings ruined marriages, careers and
schooling.

"My heart, it aches for my son," said Mary Strenko, whose 21-year-old son
was Charles Cullen's youngest victim. "I walk around with a hole in my
heart."

Cullen has admitted to using lethal doses of medications - usually the
heart medication dig oxin - to kill patients.

He told authorities when he was arrested in 2003 that he killed "very
sick" patients, and he described the slayings as mercy killings.

(source: Associated Press)



Reply via email to