March 29 PENNSYLVANIA: Pennsylvania appeals ruling against Banks' execution In Wilkes-Barre, prosecutors have appealed a judge's ruling that mass murderer George Banks is too mentally ill to be executed. Luzerne County Court Judge Michael Conahan ruled Feb. 27 that Banks cannot be put to death because he is too mentally ill to understand that he is facing execution for the 1982 murders of 13 people. The state Attorney General's Office on Monday appealed to the state Supreme Court, arguing that Conahan improperly prevented a prosecution expert from testifying at Banks' competency hearing. Banks used a semiautomatic rifle to kill 7 children - 5 of them his own - plus his 3 live-in girlfriends, an ex-girlfriend and her mother, and a bystander in the street. (source: Associated Press) ILLINOIS: Treat, don't execute, our mentally ill Now that the candidates are finished attacking each other in the primaries, it's time for them to tackle some real issues that affect all of us: like the fact that the State of Illinois favors execution over treatment for the mentally ill. Not only is the execution of the mentally ill inhumane, it is preventable. Mental health is a public health issue. It affects one out of five American families. Almost 1/2 of all people with a severe mental illness do not get the treatment they need. In 2004, for example, 60 % of emergency physicians reported that the increasing number of people with mental illness seeking treatment in emergency rooms is hurting patient care, causing longer wait times and limiting everyone's access to life-saving treatment, according to the American College of Emergency Physicians. Mental health is a public safety issue. Shockingly, police have become the frontline respondents to youths and adults with severe mental illnesses who are in crisis. Municipal jails and state prisons have become default psychiatric treatment facilities. Illinois' prisons simply do not have the personnel or the resources to properly treat mentally ill inmates. At least 16 % of Illinois inmates suffer from severe mental illness, and at least 7,100 of the 44,379 adults in state prisons have been diagnosed with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder or another severe mental illness, according to the U.S. Department of Justice. The prevalence of mental illnesses among youths in Illinois juvenile justice facilities is much higher. In Archives of General Psychiatry, author L. Teplin reports that more than 1/2 of the young people in Cook County juvenile facilities -- 58.8 % of boys and 66.4 % of girls in 2003 -- have one or more psychiatric disorders. Mental health is an economic issue. Mental illness can be a significant barrier to academic success, employment and housing. Roughly 1/2 of all children with emotional and behavioral disturbances drop out of school, and up to 90 percent of adults with severe mental illness end up unemployed, according to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Untreated mental illness is a leading cause of disability, which can increase dependency on social services. At the same time, decreased productivity reduces the local and state tax base. Public investment in mental health services is a more cost-effective use of limited resources. Providing critical treatment can manage disorders and may prevent the mentally ill from landing in the correctional system. For every $1 spent on mental health services, $5 is saved in overall health-care costs, according to the American Psychological Association. Condemning mentally ill defendants to death instead of providing the services and proper care they need is unjust. It's also costly, unacceptable, and most of all, preventable. Don't let the next election pass without demanding that candidates take a stand on mental health and the need to reform the death penalty system in Illinois. Each of us must challenge the candidates to address the issues that affect all of us. Barbara Doyle, president, Illinois chapter, National Alliance on Mental Illness (source: Letter to the Editor, Chicago Sun-Times, March 24) MARYLAND: Lawyers: Muhammad Not Competent for Trial John Allen Muhammad, already sentenced to death for a sniper shooting in Virginia, is not competent to stand trial or represent himself at his Maryland trial, his lawyers said. Muhammad, who is expected to be tried in May for 6 killings in Montgomery County in 2002, is "psychotic, delusional" and "paranoid," according to a motion filed Tuesday. Muhammad was scheduled to appear in court Wednesday on his request to fire his defense lawyers and represent himself. His lawyers filed the motion and a psychiatric evaluation with Montgomery Circuit Court. Dr. Dorothy O. Lewis, a Yale University psychiatrist, interviewed Muhammad twice in September 2003 and for four hours on Monday, The Washington Post reported. She wrote in the evaluation that Muhammad's judgment and ability to think logically are "severely compromised" by brain dysfunction and that he probably suffers from "schizo-affective schizophrenia." During Monday's interview, Muhammad seemed paranoid, the psychiatrist wrote. He claimed that his attorneys were withholding information that was important to his defense. Lewis said Muhammad told her that he is innocent and thinks "his arrest was the result of an elaborate scheme to frame him for the murders." She wrote that Muhammad told her he also believes accomplice Lee Boyd Malvo was "fed information by the police and forced to make a false confession." Muhammad has refused to assist his attorneys, public defenders Paul DeWolfe and Brian D. Shefferman, saying that he can't share his "secret defense strategy" with his attorneys because "they cannot be trusted," Lewis wrote. Muhammad and Malvo are accused of murdering 10 people and wounding three during the 3-week period in October, and have been tied to killings in Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana and Washington state. Muhammad was convicted and sentenced to death for a sniper shooting in Manassas, Va. Malvo also was convicted in Virginia and sentenced to life in prison. Malvo is scheduled to go on trial in Montgomery County in the fall for the same 6 murders. He is not eligible for a death sentence because he was 17 when the killings occurred. (source: Associated Press) UTAH: Lafferty Challenges Death Penalty Again One of Utah's most notorious death-row inmates is once again appealing his death sentence. This is the 3rd time Ron Lafferty's case has been brought before the Utah Supreme Court. The 64-year-old is challenging a ruling made last November by Judge Anthony Schofield. The judge denied Lafferty's request for an evidentiary hearing on his claim that his defense team held back evidence during his 2nd jury trial in 1996. Lafferty and his brother were convicted of murdering their sister-in-law, Brenda Lafferty and her 15-month-old daughter in 1984. Dan is serving a life sentence in prison without parole. (source: Associated Press)
[Deathpenalty] death penalty news---PENN., ILL., MD., UTAH
Rick Halperin Wed, 29 Mar 2006 10:33:52 -0600 (Central Standard Time)
