March 31 INDIA: SC stays death sentence awarded to Varanasi guide The Supreme Court Friday stayed a death sentence awarded to a guide for killing a woman tourist from New Zealand at Varanasi in 1997. A Division Bench of Justice B N Agrawal and Justice A K Mathur admitted a special leave petition filed by convict Dharam Dev Yadav against an Allahabad high court order confirming the death sentence awarded to him. In his petition filed through advocate Sunil Kumar Singh, Yadav contended that the high court, in its September 30, 2003 order, wrongly confirmed his death sentence as 4 other accused were acquitted on the basis of the same evidence. The trial court had convicted Yadav in February 2003 of killing Diana Clare Routley and awarded him capital punishment. However, it had acquited four other co-accused. The case was registered on a complaint by Diana's father Allan Jack Routley in July 1998, stating that his daughter had not made any contact with the family since August 1997. Investigation revealed that Diana, who was staying at Old Vishnu Guest House, Varanasi, was last seen at the railway station there with Yadav on August 8, 1998. Skeleton remains of the deceased was recovered from Yadav's house at Brindavan village of Ghazipur district of Uttar Pradesh. The police had also recovered the sleeping bag and camera of the deceased from the possesion of other co-accused. (source: Rediff) MALAYSIA: Death sentence stays for Indon An Indonesian labourer looked calm when the Court of Appeal dismissed his appeal against conviction and the death sentence on a charge of drug trafficking. Parlan Dadeh, 33, nodded his head when an inter- preter from the Indonesian Consulate here explained the courts decision to him yesterday. Parlan was charged with trafficking in 436.2gm of cannabis in front of a restaurant in Jalan Tok Kangar, Juru, Central Seberang Prai on Nov 8, 2000. He was found guilty and sentenced to death by a High Court here on April 29, 2003. The Court of Appeal deli-vered its decision after having heard arguments by counsel M.M. Athimulan and DPP Manoj Kurup on Monday. At the hearing of the appeal, DPP Manoj had submitted that Parlan had knowledge of the drug as it was concealed at his waist inside his jeans. Athimulan said that although inference could be drawn that Parlan knew he was concealing prohibited items, he might not have known it was a drug. Court of Appeal Justices Gopal Sri Ram, Mohd Ghazali Mohd Yusoff, and Zulkefli Ahmad Makinudin in their finding, said Parlan's counsel had relied heavily on Parlan having no knowledge of the content of the black plastic bag tucked inside his jeans. "The court must weigh if the Parlan's claim of ignorance is credible. "After perusing the record carefully, the question arises as to who could have placed the plastic bag inside his jeans. Only he could have done so," the court held. The court also held that it was entirely satisfied that the trial judge had been right in ruling that Parlan had knowledge of the content of the plastic bag in his possession. The court dismissed Parlan's appeal. The decision allows Parlan an automatic appeal to the Federal Court. In an unrelated case in a magistrate's court here yesterday, chicken seller Mo-hamed Faizal Kamaludeen denied 6 counts of cheating a chicken supplier of RM28,000. Defence counsel Lucia Minta told the court that her client could not afford a high sum of bail because his business suffered following the avian flu outbreak. Mohamed Faizal, 24, is charged with cheating Ang Eng Thye by issuing the latter cheques for amounts totalling RM28,000 as payment for chicken supplied to him when his account had been closed. He is alleged to have committed the offences between Oct 13 and Nov 7 last year. Magistrate Shahrizat Ismail fixed bail at RM9,500 for all 6 charges pending hearing on Nov 7. Mohamed Faizal posted bail. (source: Malaysia Star) RWANDA: Death penalty could be waived -Kagame The government will consider lifting the capital punishment on genocide suspects whose extradition is subject to condition that they will not face the death sentence, President Paul Kagame has said. The President was on Thursday responding to journalists' questions on whether Rwanda was willing to let go the transfer to Rwanda of genocide suspects detained at the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) or give in to the Tribunals demands to exonerate the suspects from facing a death sentence. He said that much as the capital punishment is entrenched in the country's laws, it was not worth to insist on its application on suspects that are not in government's hands. Giving an example of genocide suspect Leon Mugesera, who the Canadian government apprehended last year but said it wouldn't extradite to Rwanda unless it was assured that he would not face capital punishment, the President said: "You have to make a choice between removing that punishment on that particular case and have that person extradited or refuse and dont have him extradited." "To me, I would allow a waiver on that person and have him tried here; after all, there is nowhere else he would be subjected to the death sentence. There is at least that value addition when he is tried here than outside (the country)," the President said. He said government would determine which inmates at the ICTR it is more interested in, and consider waiving the death sentence on them. The United Nations-backed court based in the Tanzanian northern town of Arusha conditioned Rwanda to waive the capital punishment before the transfer of any of the inmates to Kigali. Under UN laws the death sentence is not tenable. However, Kagame said the development would not have a bearing on those facing the capital punishment in the country. "The ICTR case does not change anything on criminal cases within the country. Death penalty remains in our laws and will not be affected by external factors," he said. The government last year completed the construction of a modern detention centre at Mpanga in the Southern province, in readiness to receive some of the ICTR inmates but the transfer process has still not materialised. (source: Newtimes) ENGLAND: The secret executioner--Albert Pierrepoint was Britain's most prolific hangman, ending the lives of 400 men and women - including Ruth Ellis. Yet his wife, and the drinkers at the pub he ran, never knew. Now his extraordinary double life has been captured on film. "I do not now believe that any one of the hundreds of executions I carried out has in any way acted as a deterrent against future murder. Capital punishment, in my view, achieved nothing except revenge." He should know. Albert Pierrepoint was, by far, Britain's most prolific hangman. Between 1934 and 1956, he executed more than 400 men and women, among them Ruth Ellis, the last woman to be hanged in Britain, Derek Bentley, Lord Haw-Haw (the wartime traitor William Joyce) and John George Haigh, the acid bath murderer. He put to death Timothy Evans, wrongly convicted of murdering his daughter, and subsequently John Christie, the real killer. He hanged large numbers of Nazi war criminals convicted at the Nuremberg trials, including Josef Kramer, the Beast of Belsen, and Irma Grese, the cruellest woman concentration camp guard of them all. These two were among 13 he executed on the same day. The man behind the noose, doing the job that his father and his uncle had performed before him, believed, in his own words, "that I was chosen by a higher power for the task which I took up, that I was put on this earth especially to do it". He did it better, quicker and more humanely than anyone had done before. But being an executioner (the word hangman is considered vulgar, and never used officially) is by its nature an occasional job. Pierrepoint spent the rest of his working life first as a horse-drayman delivering groceries, and then, after the war, as the genial and gregarious host of a pub he had bought near Manchester, called - the irony was not lost on him - Help the Poor Struggler. His geniality, though, never went as far as discussing his other, freelance, activity. In his autobiography Executioner: Pierrepoint, and as brilliantly portrayed by Timothy Spall in the upcoming film, Pierrepoint emerges as a complex, enigmatic figure who, to anyone unaware of his calling, would have seemed the epitome of ordinary. He was no monster; there is no evidence of any sadistic streak or other psychological quirk suggesting that he took pleasure from what he did. At no stage does he admit to enjoying his job. He hated talking about it, and never boasted or told stories of his hanging achievements. He abhorred newspaper publicity and was genuinely distressed when his postwar activities in Germany attracted reporters to his door. Astonishingly, for many years he had not even told his wife Anne of his part-time job, making up excuses for his occasional overnight absences. Only when he had to be away for several days, in Germany, did he confess to her. By this time she had already found out, and was pleased that he had finally told her, but his work was never the subject of marital conversation. His autobiography is dedicated: "To Anne my wife who, in 40 years never asked a question... with grateful thanks for her loyalty and discretion." Pierrepoint was proud that he had never made his own views public on the rights and wrongs of the death penalty. When he appeared before the 1949 Royal Commission on the subject he was asked: "Have you had any experience of judging what the general opinion of ordinary people in England is about capital punishment? I imagine people talk to you about your duties?" His reply: "Yes, but I refuse to speak about it. It is something I think should be secret. It is something I think should be sacred to me, really." His use of the word sacred is telling. His was a calling, not a trade or profession, and Pierrepoint regarded it religiously. He wrote about his hanging duties as a priest would do. "A condemned prisoner is entrusted to me, after decisions have been made which I cannot alter. He is a man, she is a woman who, the church says, still merits some mercy. The supreme mercy I can extend to them is to give them and sustain in them their dignity in dying and in death. The gentleness must remain." He would not tolerate anyone making macabre or lewd remarks or jokes about the body, and never did so himself, even in the convivial atmosphere of his pub. When his autobiography was published in 1974, it was the 1st time he had made his views on capital punishment public - a decade after its abolition. "If death were a deterrent, I might be expected to know. It is I who have faced them last, young men and girls, working men, grandmothers. I have been amazed to see the courage with which they take that walk into the unknown. It did not deter them then, and it had not deterred them when they committed what they were convicted for. All the men and women whom I have faced at that final moment convince me that in what I have done I have not prevented a single murder. And if death does not work to deter one person, it should not be held to deter any." Yet there is nothing he ever wrote suggesting that he felt any regret or remorse at the central role he had played; nor any explanation of why and when he had reached that startling conclusion. There are no indications that he found it morally difficult to try to reconcile his feelings about the efficacy of hanging with the job he did with such pride. He was capable of analysing his own contribution in a vacuum, divorced from the national debate on the larger issue. Perhaps he only discovered his intellectual objections to the death penalty long after he had ceased being the hangman; he does not tell us. If Pierrepoint felt any strong emotions about the people he executed, he did not admit to it. He showed no signs of being affected by, or indeed interested in, the details of the crimes committed by those whose lives he was to end; he seemed untouched by knowing that some of the men he had executed had been innocent - Timothy Evans, for instance. Others may have made a mistake; it was not his concern. Even when Pierrepoint tells the story of having to execute someone he knew - a regular customer and his singing partner at the pub, who had killed his girlfriend in a jealous frenzy - he expresses no particular sorrow, only satisfaction that he had made the condemned man's last few minutes more bearable by addressing him as a friend, by his nickname, Tish. Pierrepoint never publicly revealed his reasons for resigning as chief executioner, but it was not, as has been rumoured, because he had become opposed to capital punishment or revolted by the act of hanging. At no stage of his career was he troubled by his conscience, and the fact that he didn't believe in the death penalty as a deterrent had no bearing on his willingness to do his job. Nor, as another rumour suggested, was it a reaction to having to hang Ruth Ellis. "At the execution of Ruth Ellis no untoward incident happened which in any way appalled me or anyone else, and the execution had no connection with my resignation seven months later. Nor did I leave the list [of executioners], as one newspaper said, by being arbitrarily taken off it, to shut my mouth, because I was about to reveal the last words of Ruth Ellis. She never spoke." (Pierrepoint had told the Royal Commission years before that, in the moments before execution, "I think a woman is braver than a man... I have never seen a man braver than a woman."). The truth behind his resignation is more prosaic. He had travelled to Strangeways to execute a prisoner who, at the last minute, received a reprieve. The prison refused to pay the fee for his wasted journey. His pride hurt, he chose to resign rather than accept the paltry sum offered. He was only 51, and spent most of his remaining years in Southport, running or working in pubs, discreet until the end. He died in 1992, aged 87. Neither was he, contrary to widespread belief, Britain's last hangman. After his sudden resignation there were 37 further executions before the abolition of the death penalty. The last two were carried out at exactly the same time in Liverpool and Manchester, on August 13 1964, so that neither executioner could claim to have individually performed the last one. The whole passionate debate over capital punishment had taken place without a word from the man who knew more about it than any one alive. (source: Guardian) PAKISTAN: Witness at terror trial admits plots to kill Pakistan president An American supergrass giving evidence against seven British terrorist suspects admitted yesterday that he had plotted to kill the Pakistani president. Mohammad Babar, 31, told the Old Bailey he had been involved in two separate attempts to assassinate General Pervez Musharraf in 2002, and could be facing the death penalty in Pakistan, had he not done a deal with the FBI. Babar said he had helped one set of would-be assassins obtain AK47s, ammunition and grenades. But he said none of the 7 British men on trial had anything with the Pakistan conspiracies. Babar has admitted his role in a "British bomb plot" to a New York federal court. He says he met most of the British defendants at terrorist training camps in Pakistan and helped with their plans to carry out a bombing campaign in the UK. He agreed he might be on death row in Pakistan if he had not agreed to give evidence at the Old Bailey. But he denied suggestions from Joel Bennathan, counsel for Omar Khyam, one of the seven defendants, that his evidence against Mr Khyam was not true and that he had taken speculation and "twisted it into a firm and settled plot in the UK" to make himself a valuable witness. The 7 men are accused of plotting to use half a tonne of fertiliser to make explosives. They allegedly discussed bombing the Bluewater shopping centre in Kent, nightclubs and pubs in London's West End, transport, electricity and gas networks, and carrying out mass poisonings by spiking beer and takeaway foods. Mr Khyam, 24, his brother Shujah Mahmood, 18, Jawad Akbar, 22, Waheed Mahmood, 33, all from Crawley, West Sussex, Anthony Garcia, 27, from Ilford, Essex, Nabeel Hussain, 20, from Horley, Surrey, and Salahuddin Amin, 31, from Luton, Bedfordshire, all deny conspiracy to cause explosions. Omar Khyam, Anthony Garcia and Nabeel Hussain deny possessing 600kg of ammonium nitrate fertiliser, and Mr Khyam and Shujah Mahmood deny possessing aluminium powder, which can also be used to make bombs. Yesterday, Babar told the court Mr Khyam had received theoretical training and practical demonstration in how to construct explosive devices , and that he and Khyam had practised setting off devices in Babar's back yard in Lahore, Pakistan, using recipes from the internet. (source: Guardian) CHINA: Oil thieves may face death penalty Anyone found stealing petroleum from fuel pipelines may be executed if they seriously harm any fuel facilities or steal petroleum, a senior official of the Ministry of Public Security said today. Police officers arrested 2,877 criminals and suspects, busted 221 criminal rings and detected 4,285 individual crimes. These crimes would have cost petroleum enterprises 1 billion yuan (US$ 125 million). "Petroleum crimes have impacted the local securities," Ma Weiya, a vice director of the social security management department, said in today's press conference. "In some areas, the criminal rings even have their own sales networks." "Most pipelines are in China's countryside. Local farmers used to drill holes in the pipelines, and then sell the petroleum to small refineries," he said. "According to the Criminal Law, petroleum criminals can be sentenced to death, since they potentially threaten public security by destroying facilities and endangering lives transporting the very inflammable good. "In some areas, thieves destroyed pipelines and petroleum facilities, which have become serious problems. The local police should tighten act more against these types of crimes," he said. Authorities will further establish an efficient mechanism to protect the petroleum production industry. China already has almost 30,000 kilometers of pipelines, which will be extended in the near future. (source: Shanghai Daily)
[Deathpenalty] death penalty news----worldwide
Rick Halperin Fri, 31 Mar 2006 09:57:13 -0600 (Central Standard Time)
- [Deathpenalty] death penalty news----worldwide Rick Halperin
- [Deathpenalty] death penalty news----worldwide Rick Halperin
- [Deathpenalty] death penalty news----worldwide Rick Halperin
- [Deathpenalty] death penalty news----worldwide Rick Halperin
- [Deathpenalty] death penalty news----worldwide Rick Halperin
- [Deathpenalty] death penalty news----worldwide Rick Halperin
- [Deathpenalty] death penalty news----worldwide Rick Halperin
- [Deathpenalty] death penalty news----worldwide Rick Halperin
- [Deathpenalty] death penalty news----worldwide Rick Halperin
- [Deathpenalty] death penalty news----worldwide Rick Halperin
- [Deathpenalty] death penalty news----worldwide Rick Halperin
- [Deathpenalty] death penalty news----worldwide Rick Halperin
- [Deathpenalty] death penalty news----worldwide Rick Halperin
- [Deathpenalty] death penalty news----worldwide Rick Halperin
- [Deathpenalty] death penalty news----worldwide Rick Halperin
- [Deathpenalty] death penalty news----worldwide Rick Halperin
- [Deathpenalty] death penalty news----worldwide Rick Halperin
- [Deathpenalty] death penalty news----worldwide Rick Halperin
- [Deathpenalty] death penalty news----worldwide Rick Halperin
- [Deathpenalty] death penalty news----worldwide Rick Halperin
- [Deathpenalty] death penalty news----worldwide Rick Halperin