June 5


VIRGINIA:

Trial starts today in 1988 slaying of Yorktown High grad, boyfriend


Opening statements are expected this morning in the capital murder trial
of a California death row inmate charged with killing a Yorktown High
School graduate and her boyfriend in Virginia nearly 20 years ago.

Fairfax prosecutors and lawyers for Alfredo Prieto will first make their
final decisions on the makeup of the jury.

Prieto, 41, has been on California's death row for 15 years, convicted of
fatally shooting a 15-year-old girl there. When California put DNA samples
of its death row inmates into a national database 2 years ago, Prieto was
linked to the December 1988 slayings of Rachael Raver and Warren Fulton
III in Virginia.

Raver had graduated in 1988 from George Washington University, where she
played soccer. Fulton was a senior and captain of the school's baseball
team. Both victims were 22.

Prieto's lawyers will argue that he is mentally retarded and damaged from
an abusive upbringing in El Salvador.

(source: The Journal News)






LOUISIANA:

U.S. Supreme Court would regard this case differently. Unfortunately, it's
not an idle hope.


In a 1977 ruling, only four justices signed an opinion saying that capital
punishment for rape was always unconstitutional. Justice Lewis Powell
voted to vacate the sentence on the narrower rationale that "death is
disproportionate punishment for the crime of raping an adult woman,"
leaving open the possibility that rape of a child might qualify as a
capital crime.

A majority of the current court might be willing to seize on the
distinction Powell drew by upholding the death penalty for Kennedy. And
the justices might be influenced by the argument that Louisiana's law,
which capitalizes the crime of aggravated rape of a child under 12,
reflects "evolving standards of decency." As the Louisiana court noted, 4
other states have followed Louisiana's lead. Texas will join the list if,
as expected, the governor signs a bill recently approved by the
Legislature.

The rape of a child is an unspeakable crime. In its decision, the
Louisiana court wrote that "short of 1st-degree murder, we can think of no
other non-homicide crime more deserving" of the death penalty. But
imaginative state legislators might easily discover other offenses worthy
of the ultimate punishment: terrorism, major drug dealing (a capital
offense under federal law) or violent hate crimes. Capital punishment has
proved dysfunctional and divisive as a sanction for murder. The U.S.
Supreme Court shouldn't compound the error - and increase its own workload
- by allowing states to execute criminals who do not take a human life.

(source: Editorial, Los Angeles Times)






KENTUCKY:

High Court Rejects Death-Row Inmate's Appeal


A Kentucky death row inmate convicted under an alias has lost his bid to
have his case heard by the U.S. Supreme Court.

The high court on Monday rejected an appeal from Jeffrey Leonard, 44. He
is on Kentucky's death row as James Slaughter. Leonard had asked the
Supreme Court to take his case to clarify how bad his attorney must be and
that his rights were violated by the poor legal representation.

Leonard has spent nearly 25 years on Kentucky's death row. Attorney
Ferdinand Radolovich was appointed to represent him. Radolovich has
admitted that he did little to investigate Leonard's background, including
not knowing Leonard's real name as he represented him.

(source: WLKY News)

*******************************

2 spared death penalty, get 50 years each


A Jefferson Circuit Court jury recommended this afternoon that 2
Louisville men found guilty in the December 2004 shooting death of Shirley
Thomas spend 50 years in prison for her murder.

Tywan Beaumont and Christian Walker were facing a possible death sentence
but now will go in front of a parole board in 20 years.

On Friday, jurors found Beaumont and Walker guilty of murder, robbery,
assault and tampering with physical evidence.

The jury must come back Tuesday morning to sentence the 2 for the robbery,
assault and tampering charges. Under sentencing guidelines, Walker and
Beaumont cant face any more than 70 years in prison.

Beaumont buried his head in his hands on the table in front of him after
the sentence was read, as deputies moved close behind him. Walker showed
no emotion but told family members he loved them as he was led from court.

Joe Ansari, an attorney for Walker, said he was disappointed that his
client was given the same sentence as Beaumont, who he claimed was the
shooter.

Beaumonts attorney couldnt be reached for comment.

Assistant Commonwealths Attorneys Mark Baker and Rick Taylor declined to
comment on the sentencing, given that it has not been completed. But Baker
called Thomas a true innocent who was killed after getting home from
teaching choir.

Police have said Walker, 21, and Beaumont, 24, tried to rob Thomas son,
Phillip, when he was parking a car. When Thomas came out of the house to
investigate, both men fired at her, police said.

Thomas, 56, of the 900 block of Camden Avenue, died at University Hospital
of a gunshot wound in the chest. Thomas sons girlfriend was wounded in the
shooting.

In February 2006, Beaumont pleaded guilty to murder robbery, assault and
tampering with physical evidence and agreed to a sentence of 25 years in
prison if he would testify against Walker.

But Beaumont later refused to testify and his plea was thrown out earlier
this year, said Taylor.

(source: Louisville Courier-Journal)






CALIFORNIA:

D.A. asks for death penalty----Newark man killed San Leandro officer


A Newark man convicted of murdering a San Leandro police officer in 2005
should be sentenced to death because he made a selfish decision to kill
the officer instead of going back to jail, Alameda County's top prosecutor
told jurors Monday.

When stopped by the officer, Irving Ramirez didn't run away or drop the
10mm semiautomatic handgun that he had with him, said District Attorney
Tom Orloff. Instead, he shot Officer Nels "Dan" Niemi in the head and then
fired six more shots as he was on the ground, Orloff said.

"Mr. Ramirez has already stolen Dan Niemi's life. Don't let him steal his
moral constituency," Orloff told jurors during his closing argument Monday
in the penalty phase of the defendant's trial. Ramirez "deserves the most
severe sanction the law provides for -- that is the penalty of death."

But an attorney for Ramirez, Deborah Levy, urged the jury Monday to "show
mercy" and spare her client's life, as he would never be released into
society and would die behind bars.

"This is not 'kill and you shall be killed,' '' Levy said. "It's not that
simple. American justice is not 'an eye for an eye.' "

The jury began deliberations Monday. Ramirez, 25, faces either the death
penalty or life in prison without the possibility of parole for fatally
shooting Niemi, 42, near Doolittle Drive and Belvedere Avenue on July 25,
2005. Officers found Ramirez's ID near an unconscious Niemi, who was shot
in the face and leg and numerous times in the chest, authorities said.

On May 10, a jury of eight men and four women convicted Ramirez of
1st-degree murder and special circumstances of killing a police officer
and killing to avoid arrest.

On Monday, Orloff told jurors that at Niemi's funeral, his daughter,
Gabrielle, then 6, hugged his casket. "The little girl didn't have a
chance to say goodbye to her dad," Orloff said.

Levy said her client wasn't the "worst of the worst," and then recited a
list of notorious murderers as evidence of those who were: Charles Manson,
the Columbine killers, the Unabomber, the Zodiac, the Trailside Killer,
Jeffrey Dahmer and Seung-Hui Cho, the gunman at Virginia Tech.

"These people have, in essence, given up their right to live," Levy said.

The defense attorney stressed that she wasn't trying to excuse what
Ramirez did. But she said police officers have a dangerous job. One way to
honor Niemi's memory was to sentence her client to life in prison, she
said.

Outside court, Niemi's widow, Dionne, expressed anger at Levy's remarks.

"Ms. Levy gives new definition to the phrase, 'The law is an ass,' " Niemi
said, referring to a phrase uttered by a character in "Oliver Twist," by
Charles Dickens. ' I have never heard an attorney be so crass and so
unprofessional."

(source: San Francisco Chronicle)






WASHINGTON, DC----federal death penalty trial

Death-penalty deliberations to begin


Jurors in the case of Larry Gooch, an enforcer in a D.C. drug gang found
guilty of murder, will begin deciding today whether he should receive the
death penalty.

Gooch, 27, was found guilty Friday in U.S. District Court of the Aug. 1,
2000, murders of Christopher Lane, 19, and William Cunningham, 27, and the
Feb. 21, 2003, murders of Calvin Cooper, 40, and his girlfriend, Yolanda
Miller, 32.

Yesterday, the jurors received their instructions to determine whether the
government has proven beyond a reasonable doubt that Gooch meets criteria
making him eligible for the death penalty.

The jury could deliver its decision as early as tomorrow.

If Gooch is determined to be eligible for the death penalty, it will lead
to the penalty-selection phase of the case, which would likely start next
week.

At that point, the government will take testimony from victims and family
members to show why Gooch deserves to be executed. The defense will
counter with testimony and arguments as to why Gooch should receive life
in prison without parole. He was found guilty after 15 days of
deliberation.

Though capital punishment is banned in the District, Gooch could get the
death penalty because he has been charged in a federal case.

The Justice Department last year filed a notice of intent to seek the
death penalty against Gooch, a decision that had required the approval of
U.S. Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales.

According to court documents, Gooch, nicknamed "Goo," was considered
"crazy" by other members of the M Street Crew, a PCP ring in Northeast. He
acted as the gang's "enforcer" or "muscle," the documents state.

3 leaders in the M Street gang are serving life sentences in the case.
More than 30 people have been arrested, but Gooch is the only defendant
facing the death penalty.

Gooch shot Miss Miller and her boyfriend, Mr. Cooper, because he suspected
they were stealing drugs or cooperating with police, prosecutors charged.
Mr. Cooper was found shot three times in the back in an alley.

Gooch killed Mr. Cunningham during a home-invasion robbery, while a
co-defendant killed Mr. Lane, authorities said.

During Gooch's trial, which began in January, his attorneys argued that
their client did not shoot anybody and challenged prosecutors' depiction
of him as an enforcer.

(sourece: Washington Times)




Reply via email to