Sept. 2 CHINA: Death sentence in rampage sparks debate in China Yang Jia, convicted in the July stabbing deaths of 6 officers, had been in police custody last year. The attack prompted many Chinese to question police treatment of suspects. An unemployed man charged with killing 6 Shanghai police officers in a knife attack was sentenced to death Monday, state media reported. However, the 28-year-old seemed to engender as much sympathy as condemnation from many Chinese, who expressed concerns online about police treatment of suspects and the fairness of the legal system. The Shanghai No. 2 People's Intermediate Court found Yang Jia guilty of premeditated murder and ordered the death penalty for the Beijing man, said the official New China News Agency. On July 1, Yang stabbed a security guard at a police building in Shanghai's Zhabei District, started a fire at the gate, then attacked nine officers inside the building with a knife. Shanghai's public security bureau said at a news conference July 7 that Yang had sought revenge after Zhabei police interrogated and detained him for 6 hours last fall over a stolen bicycle. In the wake of the stabbing attack, there has been an outpouring of comments online from citizens nationwide, as well as from Chinese media, questioning how a seemingly minor incident could trigger a rampage that left six people dead and 4 others injured. Many Chinese raised suspicions that Yang was beaten by police, which Shanghai authorities denied. Police said Yang in fact had rented the bicycle, and that he demanded about $1,450 in compensation from authorities for mental anguish. The legal proceedings and the secretive trial of Yang fanned more criticisms on Internet sites, some of which apparently were blocked or shut down Monday. "If you and I were Yang Jia, we could be sentenced under such namely legal but unclear ways," said one posting on a lawyer's blog. Said another: "They have a guilty conscience, so all the websites closed the comment function for this news. This is red terror." Officials at Shanghai police headquarters and the No. 2 People's Intermediate Court would not comment Monday. It was unclear whether Yang would appeal the ruling. A death sentence faces automatic review by China's Supreme Court. Yang's attorney, Xie You- ming, was not taking media calls Monday, said a colleague at Shanghai's Mingjiang law firm. Xie has been an advisor to Zhabei District, the local jurisdiction, prompting questions about whether the lawyer could represent Yang fully. Xiong Liesuo, a Beijing lawyer, said that Yang's father in Beijing had retained him to represent the defendant. But Xiong said that when he went to Shanghai in mid-July, the court told him that Yang already had accepted the services of a lawyer arranged by his divorced mother, and would not allow Xiong to see Yang. Xiong has not been able to reach the mother in Beijing. "Yang's father is obviously very worried about the result and feels it's unfair, unjust and not transparent," Xiong said, noting that relatives were not allowed to attend the trial. Xiong added that Yang's father, an electrician, would like to have another appraisal of his son's psychological state. Shanghai authorities said July 7 that a judicial appraisal found that Yang was mentally competent during the attack. But Liu Xiaoyuan, another Beijing attorney who has been following the case, said there was no indication a qualified medical team had examined Yang. Liu said Shanghai police had released the recording of four minutes of a 40-minute interrogation session with Yang, during which police reaction appeared professional. "But why won't they release the rest of the recording?" Liu asked. Liu said he believed that the extensive public reaction to this case reflected ordinary citizens' generally negative view of the police and their power, as well as of the lack of transparency in China's legal system. Zou Rong, a professor at East China University of Politics and Law in Shanghai, said Chinese law allows some cases to be closed to the public. Nor did he see a problem with Yang's lawyer being a consultant to the district government that is prosecuting the case. "China is a country of law," Zou said, "but it still is far from reaching the full construction of its legal system." (source: Los Angeles Times) ST. KITTS/NEVIS: Latest attempts to carry out the death penalty thwarted The death penalty is still on the books and the Government of St. Kitts and Nevis is determined to carry out court-ordered sentences of death by hanging. This was disclosed last Friday by Prime Minister and Minister of National Security, Hon. Dr. Denzil L. Douglas, who told a Rally at the CEMACO Parking Lot in New Town, following a March for Hope, Peace and Unity, that a recent attempt to carry out the sentences of death on four persons, just after the August holiday period, were thwarted when unnamed lawyers for the condemned men filed the necessary papers in Court to stay the execution. Dr. Douglas said that following an emergency meeting of the Mercy Committee, the recommendation to carry out the sentence of death was made to the Governor General, but when enquires were made later, he was informed that lawyers for the men had filed the necessary appeals. "We do our part, but others are also doing their part. The lawyers are doing their work, those that are to be hanged made reference to their lawyers, their lawyers got their papers together; lodged them at the appropriate place which is the Court and as a result of that the sentencing - the hanging is put aside for now," said Prime Minister Douglas. "The wheels of justice must be seen to be turning and I give you a commitment again that those wheels will turn as long as I am in charge of this country," said Dr. Douglas. There are some seven persons on death row in St. Kitts and Nevis. Appeals are made to the Eastern Caribbean Court of Appeal and the Privy Council. Friday's March Against Crime was organised by the Methodist Church of St. Kitts and Nevis and was attended by some 75 persons. (source: SKNVibes.com) IRAN----executions 3 prisoners hanged in Zahedan The mullahs' inhuman regime hanged 3 prisoners on Sunday identified as Hossein-Ali Shahraki, Mojtaba Mozafari and Habibollah Pirani in the southeastern city of Zahedan, reported the semi-official daily Jomhouri-Islami. It also sentenced another prisoner to death on Monday named Moharmali, 35, in Tehran, according to the state-run daily Qods. The Iranian regime pays no heed to international appeals for a halt to new wave of executions especially in the summer. It hanged 29 prisoners on July 25, in the notorious Evin prison. Execution of minors who were under 18 at the time of the alleged crimes provoked much international condemnations in August. Hanging of Reza Hejazi and Behnam Zare were the latest in the teen executions by the clerical regime. (source: NCR) ********************** UN rights office concern at rising Iran executions The U.N. human rights office voiced concern on Tuesday at a recent rise in executions in Iran and implored the Islamic Republic to stay death sentences handed down for all convicts accused of committing crimes as minors. 2 men, named as Mohammad Fadaaee and Amir Amrollahi, face imminent risk of execution on murder charges, but carrying out the death penalty would violate international law ratified by Tehran, as they were juveniles as the time, it said. "We urge the government of Iran to stay the executions of both of them in strict compliance of its international human rights obligations and not to impose the death penalty on juvenile offenders in the future," United Nations human rights spokesman Rupert Colville told a news briefing. The Office of the U.N. High Commissioner of Human Rights was "also concerned over reports of a recent increase in the number of executions in Iran in general," he said. Iran is believed to have already executed 220 people so far this year, including 6 juvenile offenders, Colville said. Among them were 29 convicted criminals hanged on July 27 and 5 people hanged a week ago, including a woman. Police in recent months have arrested dozens of people in a new drive against "immoral behaviour" in Iran, which Amnesty International has listed as the world's second-most prolific executioner in 2007 after China. The U.N. rights office was concerned that two Iranian men, Reza Hejazi and Behnam Zarei, were hanged last month for murders committed at age 15 and 16, according to Colville. "These executions appear to be in clear violation of international law, which contains an absolute prohibition of the death penalty for juvenile offenders," he said. Iran has ratified the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, as well as the Convention on the Rights of the Child, both of which ban the death penalty for crimes committed by people under age 18. Iran rejects accusations it is violating human rights and accuses the West of double standards and hypocrisy. Murder, adultery, rape, armed robbery, apostasy and drug trafficking are all punishable by death under Iran's sharia law, practised since the 1979 Islamic revolution. Iran has executed at least 30 juvenile criminals since 1990, including 7 in 2007, according to activists who say Saudi Arabia and Yemen are the only 2 other countries to do so. On July 8, major human rights groups including Amnesty International urged Iran to commute sentences against nearly 140 juvenile offenders known to be on death row at the time. U.N. human rights officials raised the issue as a "matter of urgency" while in Iran earlier this year, Colville said. South African judge Navanathem Pillay, who took over as U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights on Monday, vowed to speak out firmly for victims of rights abuses around the world -- and against the abusers. (source: Reuters) TRINIDAD: Ruling Dismays Death Penalty Advocates A court order lifting the threat of execution hanging over 52 convicted killers in Trinidad and Tobago has put the government under renewed pressure from the opposition, death penalty supporters, the public and lawyers to set out clearly its position on the ultimate sentence. On Aug. 15, high court judge Nolan Bereaux ruled that 49 men and three women awaiting execution should be taken off death row and their sentences commuted to life imprisonment They were all benefiting from a 2004 decision of the Privy Council, the twin-island's highest court of appeal, that it would have been "unfair" to execute those on death row because a year before they had been told that they could expect a review of their death sentences and even the possibility of a presidential commutation. The Privy Council had ruled on an appeal by four death row prisoners from Trinidad, Barbados and Jamaica against the mandatory death penalty in their countries. The judges struck down mandatory death penalty in Jamaica, but reversed their 2003 decision abolishing the automatic death penalty in Trinidad. The reason for this change of opinion was that the wording of Trinidad's constitution differed from that of Jamaica. The judges based their reasoning for commuting the Trinidad death sentences on a constitutional provision relating to "human rights and fundamental freedoms". It was this power, also in the Jamaican constitution, that the Privy Council had invoked to justify its ruling in 1993 that it would be "inhumane" to execute anyone after spending more than five years on death row. Bereaux's order for 52 death sentences in Trinidad to be commuted only applied to those on death row up to Jul. 7, 2004. About 30 people have been sent to death row since and are awaiting execution. But there has been an outcry over the commutation of most of the nation's death row inmates at a time of a soaring violent crime rate. So far this year, there have been 344 homicides, making it one of the highest murder rates in the world. The government should have commuted the sentences immediately after the 2004 Privy Council ruling, said Dana Seetahal, a lawyer and independent legislator. "It may be that the authorities did not want a message being sent that convicted murderers would not pay the price of their crime," Seetahal said. "The government needs to make up its mind what it intends in relation to the death penalty." Former attorney general and human rights lawyer Ramesh Maharaj agreed that the government should have acted immediately after the judges ruled in 2004. After that the legal position on the death penalty was unclear and should have been "reviewed", Maharaj said, adding: "Punishment is an important factor in the fight against crime." Criticism of the mass commutation has also been expressed by the president of the non-governmental organisation Crime Watch, Ian Alleyne. "These people should not be spared...They broke the law, they murdered and then should face the ultimate penalty for murder which is death by hanging. Criminals will continue to terrorise, kill, murder and rape our innocent law-abiding citizens," he said. Radio and television talk shows have also been inundated with callers questioning Bereaux's ruling and urging the government to resume executions. "Even before the day is over, we will record at least 2 more murders," said one irate caller. "We need to put an end to that." The government has responded to its critics by insisting that the death penalty remains in force. It has also promised unspecified measures, presumably to re-start executions, the last of which were in 1999 when eight members of a gang were hanged for several murders. "The government will take all steps which it considers necessary, including the enactment of relevant legislation to give effect to the law," said the attorney general, Brigid Annisette-George. Some of these measures would "affect" the Privy Council. She referred specifically to the 1992 Privy Council Pratt and Morgan ruling halting executions after 5 years on death row, hinting that the government would propose an amendment to its constitutional amendment bill. Israel Kahn, a lawyer, has called on the government to restrict the death penalty to premeditated murder. "Murder at this point should be classified in 3 degrees. 1st, 2nd and 3rd and the death penalty retained only for 1st degree murder until our society has developed to such a state that one day we would be able to abolish the death penalty," Kahn said. "Without the classification in reality, the death of the death penalty already exists." (source: IPS News) PHILIPPINES: House bill seeks to restore death penalty as crime-deterrent A House bill has been filed pushing to restore the death penalty. Manila Rep. Bienvenido M. Abante (6th district) said in a statement that House Bill (HB) 4882 will revive Republic Act (RA) 8177, or an Act Designating Death By Lethal Injection; RA 7659, or the Death Penalty Law; and all other laws, executive orders and decrees imposing the death penalty. He said this will deter criminals and criminally inclined elements from committing capital offenses. Lingayen-Dagupan Archbishop Oscar V. Cruz of the Catholic Bishops Conference of the Philippines said the Catholic Church will lobby against the passage of the bill. "The Catholic Church is against the death penalty, so the opposition to such a bill and the instruction that we speak against the bill is a given," he told BusinessWorld. (source: GMA News)
[Deathpenalty] death penalty news---worldwide
Rick Halperin Tue, 2 Sep 2008 16:04:40 -0500 (Central Daylight Time)
- [Deathpenalty] death penalty news---worldwide Rick Halperin
- [Deathpenalty] death penalty news---worldwide Rick Halperin
- [Deathpenalty] death penalty news---worldwide Rick Halperin
- [Deathpenalty] death penalty news---worldwide Rick Halperin
- [Deathpenalty] death penalty news---worldwide Rick Halperin
- [Deathpenalty] death penalty news---worldwide Rick Halperin
