Dear Friends: My name is Mark Henry Lankford. I am a fifty-one year old man who,since 2nd October 1983, has been incarcerated and who, since October 1984,has been sentenced to death. I was innocent in 1983. I was innocent in 1984. I remain in 2007 factually innocent of a crime of which I was convicted and for which for more than two decades my own life has been on the line. I need your help. On 7th November 2006, I became close to jubilant. Freedom - that is, glorious freedom and physical freedom - seemed legally within reach. On 7th November 2006, a three member banc of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit rendered a decision on my case which read as follows: "....The judgement of the district court is reversed and the case is remanded with instructions to grant the petition for a writ of habeas corpus, with appropriate instructions to retry Mark Lankford within a reasonable time or release him...." (http://caselaw.1p.findlaw.com/data2/circs/9th/9999015p.pdf) Retry or release. The words seemed almost magical. They evoke something close to ecstasy. Since, however, for close to twenty-five years I have in Idaho been a factually innocent victim of a corrupt criminal court system and corrupt criminal machinations designed to terminate in execution, I have learned that no victory on paper is secure. I remain today as sequestered behind concrete and steel as when too long ago I arrived in this hell hole. One of the ironies of the situation - and trust me, only one - is that for more than twenty-three years the state of Idaho has in reference to the crime of which I was convicted known, to use the vernacular, "who done it." Bryan Lankford, a younger brother, has acknowledged that he alone committed the crime for which both of us were sentenced. Bryan Lankford will perhaps forever remain behind bars. The case was long ago solved. What from the state's perspective was not solved was what to so with a wrongfully imprisoned man. I was and remain that man. In a rational environment, a solution might to Idaho have seemed fairly obvious - that is, someone who is wrongly imprisoned should expeditiously be released. Idaho is not, however, rational. I appeal from behind bars. Idaho knows that in reference to myself, there is no case to retry. The legal foundation of the original conviction was decimated by a conservative appointee to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. There is no physical evidence connecting me to any crime. There are no witnesses. There is a confession whose details conform to what is known about the case. What course of action other than effecting my release can Idaho reasonably take? Please believe that Idaho is considering other options. Deputy Attorney General L. Lamont Anderson has said as much. You, however - that is, friends who have for years been solidly supportive and new friends who feel viscerally averse to injustices and to their perpetuation - can begin to drive a wedge between tactics designed to abort and/or to delay my release and efforts by my legal team to liberate me. You can do so by breaking the silence. The silence can be broken is each friend communicates with the following entities: The Honourable Clement L. Otter Office of the Governor Post Office Box 83720 Boise, Idaho 83720, United States of America telephone: +1 208 / 3 34 21 00 facsimile: +1 208 / 3 34 34 54 mailto:governor at gov.idaho.gov salutation: Dear Governor Kirk A. MacGregor, Esquire Idaho County Prosecuting Attorney Post Office Box 463 Grangeville, Idaho 83530, United States of America telephone: (208)983-0166 facsimile: (208)983-3919 mailto:kmacgregor at connectwireless.com salutation: Dear Prosecuting Attorney Lawrence G. Wasden, Esquire Office of Attorney General Post Office Box 83720 Boise, Idaho 83720, United States of America telephone: +1 208 / 3 34 24 00 fax: +1 208 / 3 34 25 30 salutation: Dear Attorney General and if each friend focusses on the following issues: - Mark Henry Lankford's prolonged incarceration as a factually innocent prisoner - a November 2006 federal court ruling, confirmed in October 2007, that Mark Henry Lankford should be retried or should be released - the absence of any legal foundation for a retrial for Mark Henry Lankford - the imperative that Mark Henry Lankford should in the service of justice be released. Copies of communications can be mailed to a national newspaper of your choice and/or to the following: Idaho Statesman Post Office Box 40 Post Office Box 40 Boise, Idaho 83707-0040, United States of America telephone: +1 208 / 3 77 64 32 fax: +1 208 / 3 77 64 49 mailto:newsroom at idahostatesman.com and, if convenient, a blind copy can be electronically mailed to me. You can make a difference! I thank you for your attention in reading this letter. Exciting legal developments have begun to occur, developments which will as updates on my web site appear. I close with felicitous wishes to you and to your families. Please take care and as always in peace. Namaste. Yours truly, Mark Henry Lankford http://home.foni.net/~tm-stgt/Lankford/#GB mailto:marklankford at comcast.net
[Deathpenalty] death penalty news----IDAHO...Mark Henry Lankford - imminent exoneree (?) - please act....
Rick Halperin Sat, 13 Oct 2007 22:20:51 -0500 (Central Daylight Time)