April 11 NEW HAMPSHIRE: Hearing begins on death penalty challenges in Manchestefr police officer's murder The death penalty case against the man accused of murdering a Manchester police officer two years ago could hinge on hearings that began with a sociologist arguing that black men are more likely to be sentenced to death. Lawyers for Michael Addison, 28, are looking to experts on race and the death penalty as they argue that the state's capital murder law is unconstitutionally flawed. At a Superior Court hearing that began Thursday, sociologist William Bowers testified that juries composed mostly of white men were more likely to sentence a black defendant to death, especially if the victim was white. Addison, who is black, is charged with shooting Officer Michael Briggs, who was white. Addison's lawyers are trying to prove that racial bias can play a part in whether a jury sentences someone to death or life in prison. Prosecutors questioned the validity of the study that was the focus of Bowers' testimony and said the state's experts should be allowed to review and draw their own conclusions from its 1,200 interviews with death-case jurors. Bowers said the raw data is confidential, prompting judge Kathleen McGuire to jump in. "It's not clear to me why you're here to give opinions when you won't give up the raw data on which the opinions are based," she said. Bowers responded that on some issues, "we feel the evidence is strong enough ... to make a statement of opinion to a scientific certainty." Senior Assistant Attorney General said the courts have built safeguards against prejudice into the system. He also said other studies of death penalty cases are at odds with the Capital Jury Project that Bowers participated in. Briggs, 35, was fatally wounded in an alley on Oct. 15, 2006, after he and a partner approached Addison while investigating a domestic dispute. (source: Associated Press) CALIFORNIA: Death penalty bills' focus----DA group aims to eliminate delays In a bid to reform California's death-penalty laws, 7 bills have been introduced in the state Legislature. Most of the bills are designed to eliminate delays and set key benchmarks. One bill seeks to expand the crimes punishable by death by including the intentional killing of a child under 14 years old. An announcement of the legislation was made at a news conference Wednesday in Sacramento by members of the California District Attorneys Association with members of the state Senate and Assembly. "The voice of those who have been victims of these brutal crimes must never be forgotten," Riverside County District Attorney Rod Pacheco, who chairs the association's Capital Litigation Committee, said in a prepared statement. "We speak for them and seek accountability for the criminals who have been convicted and sentenced." Members of the group said they seek an efficient, timely and fair death penalty in California. If the Legislature fails to act on the bills, the group will take the matter to state voters in the form of a ballot initiative, Pacheco said. San Bernardino County District Attorney Michael A. Ramos echoed his Riverside County colleague's sentiments in a telephone interview Thursday. "We really need to move forward on cleaning up the whole capital litigation process," he said. The biggest impact is on victims' family members who wait years and years for justice, Ramos said. Since the death penalty was reinstated in 1978 in California, executions have been delayed an average of nearly 18 years, according to the state Department of Justice. But recent trends indicate death-row inmates will wait more than 20 years before they are executed, Pacheco said. Death-penalty opponents agree the system is flawed and are pushing for alternatives, such as life in prison without parole, a sentence they see as cheaper, faster and more effective. "I think these bills are really out of touch with the direction the state is moving," said Stefanie Faucher, program director for the San Francisco-based Death Penalty Focus. Founded in 1988, Death Penalty Focus is a nonprofit dedicated to educating the public about capital punishment. Faucher called it premature to offer legislation when a bipartisan blue-ribbon commission addressing the death penalty is expected to announce possible reforms in June. The bills introduced in the Legislature aim to have a qualified defense attorney appointed to an inmate within one year of sentencing, make trial attorneys responsible for court records' accuracy, and allow judges to choose a time frame for execution as opposed to a specific date. One of the bills would give victims' families the right to raise concerns about any undue delays. (source: San Bernardino Sun) ILLINOIS: Lawyers for man charged in Nicarico slaying file motions opposing death penalty----Brian Dugan serving time for 2 murder sentences Defense attorneys for the suspect in the 1983 abduction, rape and slaying of Jeanine Nicarico filed a series of pretrial motions Thursday seeking to have the Illinois death penalty statutes declared unconstitutional. Brian Dugan, 51, faces the death penalty if convicted in the Naperville girl's death. He is serving two life sentences for 2 murders. His defense team filed four motions Thursday claiming the death penalty is arbitrary and illegal. A similar motion was filed last month and a sixth is expected to be filed next week. DuPage County State's Atty. Joseph Birkett said he will "vigorously" oppose the motions at a June 26 hearing before Judge George Bakalis. (source: Chicago Tribune) CONNECTICUT: Lawyer Presses For Death Row Inmates' Rights Death row inmates claim they are being denied access to group religious services, group recreation, use of gym equipment and visits with friends and family, amounting to a violation of their constitutional rights, according to a letter sent to the Department of Correction on Thursday from an American Civil Liberties Union lawyer. Additionally, the men say they are also denied the chance to send photographs of themselves to loved ones, as other inmates are allowed, or to walk unshackled during certain times, including to and from the shower, as are other inmates who are in the highest risk level. The death row inmates are housed at Northern Correctional Institution in Somers. Such conditions prompted the inmates to go on a hunger strike last May. "Officials have both verbally and in writing promised to secure certain privileges for the death row inmates in exchange for the cessation of the most recent hunger strike," wrote the lawyer, David McGuire. "A number of these promises have not been fulfilled." Brian Garnett, Department of Correction spokesman, said he could not comment on the letter because he had not seen it. Garnett and department Commissioner Theresa Lantz attended a legislative hearing Thursday at the state Capitol on prison overcrowding that lasted more than 6 hours as of early evening. A death row inmate was involved in a recent assault on a correction officer. On Feb. 14, Lazale Ashby, who was recently sentenced to death for raping and murdering a Hartford woman, struck a correction officer, according to correction officials. While McGuire's letter does not address the Ashby incident directly, he said it is unreasonable for the department to punish all inmates for the bad acts of one. "Like any body of inmates, one should not be punished for the acts of another," he said, adding that the denial of the inmates' rights dates from before Ashby was sentenced to death row. McGuire argues that it is unreasonable for the department to limit the inmates' privileges because of a 1998 suicide attempt by Michael Ross, who was executed in 2004, or because of a letter by inmate Daniel Webb plotting an escape attempt. Both group recreation and the opportunity to eat in a common room with other death row inmates were revoked in 1998, according to the letter. In addition to being denied religious services, inmates claim they were also told they could spend time once a week with a pastor, but those visits have not consistently been provided them, according to the letter. When the pastor is available, the inmates are denied face-to-face meetings and are forced to talk to him through their steel cell doors. "It cannot be asserted that safety concerns justify the denial of access because religious service is provided sporadically, and without relation to inmate behavior," the letter states. (source: Hartford Courant) MISSOURI: Leaders seek death in child rape cases Some southwest Missouri lawmakers say if the man Springfield police allege kidnapped, raped and sodomized a 7-year-old girl on Sunday is convicted, the jury should have the option to sentence him to death. Jeffery Allen Dickson, 36, was charged Tuesday with felony counts of child kidnapping, forcible rape and 2 counts of forcible sodomy after he allegedly choked and assaulted the girl, then set a Springfield house on fire. "It is truly a case of taking advantage of someone who is truly innocent in the worst possible way," said Rep. Shane Schoeller, R-Willard. Schoeller said juries in cases of suspected child rapists such as Dickson should be able to "take the absolute harshest sentence possible, and that is death." Sen. Jack Goodman, R-Mount Vernon, filed legislation in February that would increase the punishment to life without parole or death for the forcible rape or sodomy of a child under the age of 12. A hearing was held on the legislation Monday in the Senate's judiciary committee. "Just about every bad element that could happen, (happened) in that case," Goodman said Thursday of the Dickson case. Schoeller said allowing the death penalty law would send a message to pedophiles that "you could lose your life" for raping a child. Goodman and Schoeller are among 28 lawmakers who recently signed a legal brief Gov. Matt Blunt filed in a U.S. Supreme Court case urging the high court to uphold a Louisiana law allowing the death penalty for child rapists. Schoeller said if the justices uphold the Louisiana law, it would likely spark states like Missouri to adopt similar laws. In 2006, Blunt signed "Jessica's Law," legislation modeled after a Florida law that mandates life sentences with a minimum of 30 years for serious sex offenses committed against young children. In his State of the State Address earlier this year, Blunt said sex crimes against children are "unspeakably evil" and called for a new law allowing the death penalty to be administered. "Any criminal that rapes a Missouri child deserves the most serious punishment we can deliver," Blunt said during the Jan. 15 address to lawmakers. "I urge you to make the rape of a Missouri child punishable by death." While Dickson has no previous sex crime convictions, electronic court records show he has numerous previous convictions for felonies including assault, forgery, stealing a vehicle and driving while intoxicated. As Goodman and Blunt push expanding the death penalty, there is a House bill that would put a three-year moratorium on executing inmates on death row while a study of the practice is conducted by a bipartisan commission. Springfield Reps. Sara Lampe and Charlie Norr have co-signed support for the moratorium, but both said Thursday they're in favor of the death penalty for child rapists. "I would not be opposed to the death penalty for child molesters," said Lampe, D-Springfield. Norr, also a Democrat, said he's in favor of the death penalty for rapists, but said he'd prefer to see more money put into mental health and preventative treatment for sexual predators. (source: News-Leader)
[Deathpenalty] death penalty news----N.H., ILL., CONN., MO.
Rick Halperin Fri, 11 Apr 2008 09:39:19 -0500 (Central Daylight Time)