April 14 TEXAS: Houston group helps families grieve for slain children----Support group's wish is for justice and answers to long-unsolved crimes The Houston chapter of Parents of Murdered Children meets the second Tuesday of every month from 7 to 9 p.m. at St. Paul's United Methodist Church, 5501 S. Main. For information, call Gilda Muskwinsky at 713-522-9045. The Heights chapter of Parents of Murdered Children meets every third Tuesday from 7 to 9 p.m. at 1245 Heights Blvd. For information, call Ruth Marin-Eason at 713-392-8236. They meet in the basement of St. Paul's United Methodist Church, in the same room as Alcoholics Anonymous, every 2nd Tuesday. They sit in stiff high-backed chairs, arranged in a horseshoe around a wooden lectern, sipping coffee from styrofoam cups as sepia portraits of Jesus look on forlornly and fluorescent lights flicker overhead. At the April meeting of the Houston chapter of Parents of Murdered Children earlier this month, nearly two dozen people talk about loss, grief, anger and justice. They have sought out the only other people who really understand what they're going through, and the only ones apart from friends and family who really care, they say. They share stories of homicide investigators who hardly gave them the time of day and a justice system that has left most feeling betrayed. They bemoan news coverage that trailed off as soon as the blood dried. Half of them have never seen an arrest made in their cases. For them, the story is not over. They held a rally Sunday at the Metropolitan Multi-Service Center on West Gray in hopes of bringing new light and leads to the unsolved slayings. "The grief is only intensified when justice is lacking," said Andy Kahan, director of the Mayor's Crime Victims Office. Curtain of grief The Houston Police Department's cold case unit has solved 57 homicides since it formed in 2006, some of them decades old. In many of those cases, phone calls from relatives or witnesses provided the final puzzle piece, said Lt. Craig Williams, who heads the unit. But more than 3,000 other cases remain unsolved. The support group draws relatives of many of those victims, some still reeling from slayings so fresh they haven't sunk in yet, and others for whom losses decades earlier still hang heavy. Some are outraged and outspoken, their emotions bubbling close to the surface of every sentence. Others sit back in their chairs and stare ahead without speaking, their eyes shaded from the rest of the room by a curtain of grief. "New members, we're happy to have you here," said Claudie Neal, who lost her son in 1999. "Not because of the circumstances, but because we hope you feel welcome here." Arcinia Burley wears a red name tag at her first meeting. Her son was killed March 17. There are no leads in the shooting that killed 22-year-old Calvin "Chris" Dillard, an apparently random attack in his cousin's apartment complex. Burley carries a file folder to the meeting, filled with documents on her son's case. She calls the homicide investigators exactly once a week. More, she thinks, might irritate them. She asks for advice from the group on how best to handle the investigation. She stays composed. But she is talking about details, not about her son. When it comes time for her to introduce herself to the group, she wavers. "My son Chris was murdered last month," she begins, before her voice breaks. "Oh, God, I can't do this." "You don't have to," Neal said. 'He's still with us' Marcos Cisneros still struggles to talk about his son's death. Sunday marked the five-year anniversary of Javier Cisneros' death and another year that the homicide case has stalled without leads. Javier was 23 when he was found shot to death in a ditch a few blocks from his north Houston home, his pickup idling in the street nearby. Javier still lived with his parents at the time. They have preserved his room the way it was: his bed, his TV, souvenirs from Astros and Rockets games. "I still call it Javier's room," Cisneros said at the rally. "He's still with us." Cisneros acknowledges that police may never find his son's killer. They found few clues to begin with, and each passing year makes solving the case less likely. The detective who first investigated the case has retired. "If they never find who killed him," he said, "I figure God will take care of it." Cisneros' grief doesn't drown out his thoughts anymore, but it never shuts off. He has largely stopped attending support meetings, although he stays in touch with the group. "What little I could say, helped," he said. "We went to grief counseling, too, through the Catholic Church. We went for a year, until I thought: That's enough." Cisneros and his wife, Berta, plan to retire soon. They will move back to South Texas, where they are from. While Javier was alive, they had planned to stay in Houston because he didn't want to leave. "Now that he's gone, there's nothing to keep us," Cisneros said. When they go, he will bring Javier's belongings along. "He'll still have his room, next to our room," he said. "We'll always have him with us, wherever we go." On Sunday, Marcos Cisneros helps inflate dozens of helium balloons symbolizing the victims of unsolved murders. He has come to the rally from the cemetery, where he and his wife placed flowers on their son's grave. About 100 people take seats in the basketball court at the community center. Most of the support group shows up, plus legions of loved ones. Belia Alvarez brings pictures of both of the sons she has lost. One case was solved; the other was not. "Sometimes I think I'm already dead, or this is just a bad nightmare," she said. She wants to wake up from it already, she said. But the grieving process never really ends for murders, even when the killer goes to jail, said Meg Crady, director of Baylor College of Medicine's Trauma and Grief Program. "This concept of closure and justice is an ideal," she said. Still, it's something. Marcos and Berta Cisneros approach HPD's Williams after the rally. "Our son's case is 5 years old," Berta said. "We called the detective a few weeks ago, but they never called back." "Call me tomorrow," Williams said. "I will look at it. I promise you." Outside the building, Marcos holds his balloon in the air, then lets go. His eyes follow it upward for a moment before his gaze falls to the ground. (source: Houston Chronicle) ************** Texas musicians take on death penalty In Texas, home of the busiest death chamber in the Western Hemisphere, the question is generally when, not whether, to execute condemned killers. But 25 years after the death penalty was reinstated in Texas -- and after 405 executions -- a group of homegrown artists and entertainers say it's time to take another look at capital punishment. Spearheaded by Austin singer-songwriters Sara Hickman and Trish Murphy, the entertainers are staging concerts and town-hall meetings around Texas, taking advantage of an unofficial moratorium on executions to get people talking about the issue. The concert series has been dubbed "Music for Life," and, as the name suggests, it's an anti-death penalty crowd on stage. But organizers will settle for anything short of silence on an issue they say has generated an almost stunning lack of controversy. "The whole point is just to open up a dialogue," said Murphy, whose albums include Crooked Mile and Rubies on the Lawn. "I don't think it's going to be done overnight, but that's no reason not to make the effort." Scheduling a concert in a different Texas city each month, the artists-activists have an event set in Fort Worth at the Jefferson Freedom Cafe in the fall. Former death row chaplain Carroll Pickett and Kinky Friedman, the musician-turned-writer-turned-politician, are among the speakers scheduled to participate in some of the forums. Hickman, a folk-rock singer whose albums include Motherlode and Shortstop, said the events sometimes spark heated, heart-wrenching debate. "It's definitely the hardest undertaking I've ever had, and it is very, very emotional for me. The music is very emotional," said Hickman, who performs a provocative song called The One, written from the perspective of an infamous killer's mother. "I just felt called to do it." For Friedman, who lost a bid for Texas governor in 2006, it's an opportunity to test the waters again: If he runs for governor in 2010, he says, he'll make abolition of the death penalty his top issue. "No other politicians are going to steal my idea here," he said. The former stand-up comedian said that Texans shouldn't give life-or-death power to the same politicians who "can't build a border fence, run a post office or evacuate New Orleans." Executions have been on hold nationwide since September, when the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear a constitutional challenge of execution by lethal injection. Texas inmate Michael Richard was executed the same day the court agreed to hear the case. No executions have been carried out in the state since. At issue in the Kentucky case is whether the drugs used can inflict excruciating pain and thus violate constitutional protections against cruel and unusual punishment. Robert Black, a spokesman for Gov. Rick Perry, predicted that executions would resume after the Supreme Court's review. Perry, who has presided over more executions than any other U.S. governor, believes that capital punishment has been applied fairly in Texas and that most Texans support it for heinous crimes, Black said. "As long as he is governor, he will defend it," Black said. (source: Fort Worth Star-Telegram) CALIFORNIA: Killer exhausts appeals in 30-year-old murder The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected a Los Angeles man's last remaining challenge to his death sentence for the murder of a student librarian in 1978, one of the oldest cases on California's death row. Stevie Lamar Fields had won a reversal of his sentence in 2000 from a federal judge, who ruled that he should get a new penalty trial because the jury foreman cited biblical passages to his fellow jurors after a majority had voted in favor of a life sentence. But a federal appeals court reinstated the death sentence last year, and the high court denied review of the case without comment Monday. Defense lawyer David Olson said he would consult with Fields about the possibility of further appeals and about whether to seek clemency from Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger. Fields is one of a handful of the 669 prisoners on California's Death Row to have exhausted the appeal process. Executions in California are on hold while a federal judge reviews changes to the state's lethal injection procedures after finding that the former methods lacked safeguards against a prolonged and agonizing death. Fields, now 52, went on a 3-week spree of violent crimes in September 1978, 2 weeks after he was paroled from prison on a manslaughter sentence. He was convicted of three rapes, one robbery, 2 kidnappings and the murder of Rosemary Cobb, a 26-year-old graduate student and librarian at USC. According to the trial record, he tied her to the rails of his bed, forced her to write checks to him, ordered her into a car, then shot her six times and beat her until she died. The jury that convicted Fields of murder was deadlocked 7-5 for a life sentence after a day of deliberations, Fields' lawyer said. The next morning, the foreman returned with a list of reasons for and against death. The rationales for execution included several biblical passages, such as "He that smiteth a man, so that he dies, shall surely be put to death." Jurors voted unanimously for a death sentence later that day. Defense lawyers argued that the deliberations violated Fields' right to be judged solely on courtroom evidence and improperly injected religion into the case. But the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, in a 9-6 ruling last September, said the biblical language merely expressed a common moral viewpoint that jurors could consider in reaching their verdict. While it would be improper for a prosecutor to invoke the Bible in support of a death sentence, jurors are entitled to rely on their life's experience and personal morality in deciding between life and death, the court majority said. The judges also said the prosecution had a strong case for death and the foreman's conduct had not been the deciding factor. Fields' appeal to the Supreme Court was supported by the California Council of Churches, a group of liberal denominations that argued against any use of religious material in capital case deliberations. Olson said Monday that the appeals court ruling weakened previous barriers against jurors' reliance on religious invocations. "People shouldn't be executed or convicted based on extrinsic evidence such as biblical quotations," he said. "But for this misconduct, I feel firmly that Mr. Fields would have gotten a life-without-parole sentence." The case is Fields vs. Ayers, 07-8724. (source: San Francisco Chronicle) NEW YORK: Funds for a dead office ----How the state's unused and moribund death penalty statute costs taxpayers plenty Using the pen of a slain cop and flanked by relatives of murder victims, Gov. George Pataki fulfilled a campaign promise on March 7, 1995: He restored the death penalty. 13 years and 1 month later, the law is effectively off the books -- yet still costs taxpayers. Last week, the new state budget included $368,000 for the Capital Defender's Office, which coordinated the legal representation of all defendants facing execution. The service lasted from 1995 until last year, when New York's highest court rejected the final effort to impose the penalty. Unlike any one of its clients, the office is now sure to die. But some costs linger on. The money will pay for the required storage of files, said Kevin Doyle, New York's capital defender since 1995. Yet he said he doesn't expect any additional funding will be needed in the future. As recently as 2003, state leaders were funding the office in excess of $13 million a year. "It's a job I was happy to do, but I'll be happy to be out of," said Doyle, a longtime opponent of capital punishment. The statute was all but overturned in 2004, when the Court of Appeals found a key portion unconstitutional. The ruling came when the judges vacated the death sentence for Stephen LaValle, who raped and murdered a jogger in 1997. The court decided that jury instructions in death penalty cases violated the state constitution. Jurors in this and other capital cases were offered two sentencing options: the death penalty, or life without parole. But before they deliberated, judges told them should they be deadlocked, a required sentence of 20 or 25 years to life -- which included a chance for parole -- would be imposed. In a 4-3 ruling, the high court found the instructions could persuade jurors to impose a death sentence out of fear that a killer might go free again. Last October, the law was given a final blow when the Court of Appeals rejected arguments from Queens prosecutors who hoped the gunman convicted of the 2000 Wendy's massacre could be put to death. They maintained that the controversial jury instructions were not given. But the Court of Appeals rejected the argument and left it to the Legislature to amend the law or leave it unusable. The GOP-led state Senate has passed legislation to address the court's concern. The Democratic-controlled Assembly -- which held hearings on the issue in 2005, calling 170 witnesses -- has no desire not to follow suit. Some foresaw problems from the get-go. On the day Pataki signed the law in 1995, New York City attorney Ronald J. Tabak told the Times Union he believed the law was unconstitutional and raised "the danger of pressuring juries to unanimously vote for death to avoid the possibility of parole." On Thursday, Tabak recalled a law he believes was rushed onto the books in a politically charged climate. 5 months earlier, Pataki defeated Gov. Mario Cuomo on a campaign steeped in bringing back capital punishment. "We brought these problems to their attention," said Tabak, a member of New Yorkers Against the Death Penalty who has handled several capital cases, "and they chose not do anything about it." By 2005, the state had spent at least $200 million on capital cases without a single execution taking place, according to the Web site for New Yorkers Against the Death Penalty. While New York's death penalty is, for now, for all intents and purposes off the books, that doesn't mean defendants cannot be put to death for killing police officers in New York state. Ronell Wilson, 25, a Staten Island gang member, is facing execution for the 2003 murder of 2 New York City detectives in a case prosecuted under federal law, which is not affected by the Court of Appeals ruling. New York's last execution was 45 years ago, when Eddie Lee Mays died in the electric chair at Sing Sing. (source: Albany Times-Union) NEW JERSEY: GOVERNOR CORZINE SPEAKS ON THE ELIMINATION OF THE DEATH PENALTY IN NEW JERSEY Governor Jon S. Corzine today spoke at the Legislative Abolition of the Death Penalty in New Jersey Conference to reflect on the process of abolishing the death penalty in the state. The conference was held at The Newark Club. The Governor signed legislation in December of 2007 ending the death penalty in New Jersey and today offered the following sentiments. "There were many reasons to ban the death penalty in New Jersey. It is difficult, if not impossible, to devise a humane technique of execution that is not cruel and unusual, and to develop a foolproof system that precludes the possibility of executing the innocent. New Jersey spent more than a quarter of a billion dollars to maintain its capital punishment system since 1982, even though it had not carried out a single execution for more than 4 decades, demonstrating little collective will or appetite to enforce this law. "But for me, the question was more fundamental. State-endorsed violence begets violence and undermines our commitment to the sanctity of life. We in New Jersey are proud to be the 1st state to prohibit the death penalty since it was permitted by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1976, and we are proud to serve as leaders on this profound issue of conscience." Former New Jersey Supreme Court Chief Justice James Zazzalli offered the following praise in his introduction of Governor Corzine at the conference. "I think today we desperately need leaders who are people of commitment and courage, the exception is Jon Corzine. He has demonstrated his commitment to equal justice under the law. This is an honorable man doing an honest job under tremendous difficulties and not only the state of New Jersey but indeed the whole country and all of humanity owe you a huge debt of gratitude." (source: PolitickerNJ) FLORIDA: Death Row inmate gets sentence modified to life Florida's Death Row will soon have one fewer resident. John Chamberlain, sentenced to death for a triple murder in West Palm Beach on Thanksgiving 1998, is scheduled to have his sentence modified to life in prison at a court hearing on Tuesday. The death sentence of Thomas Thibault, his co-defendant and the shooter in the bloody robbery, was reduced to life in September 2005 after a procedural technicality prompted prosecutors to offer Thibault life imprisonment as long as he didn't appeal his conviction. Chamberlain's lawyer then argued that his sentence should not be harsher. "It was our position that he was equally or less culpable," said Suzanne Keffer, Chamberlain's appellate lawyer, who works in the Fort Lauderdale office of the Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, which represents indigent death row inmates. In a motion she filed to vacate Chamberlain's sentence, Keffer cited other cases in which a death sentence was reduced on grounds of disproportionality because a co-defendant received a life sentence. Among them was a 1975 Florida Supreme Court ruling reversing the death sentence of a man because his co-defendant, the triggerman in a murder, got life. "We pride ourselves in a system of justice that requires equality before the law," the justices said. "Defendants should not be treated differently upon the same or similar facts." Circuit Judge Lucy Chernow Brown has agreed with that argument in Chamberlain's case, even though the Florida Attorney General's Office maintained that he should still get death because Thibault's life term was the result of a plea negotiation, not a jury's recommendation. On Tuesday, Brown is expected to formally resentence Chamberlain. There are 389 men and one woman on Florida's death row, according to the Florida Department of Corrections. Chamberlain is one of 10 men whose Palm Beach County crimes landed them there. The last execution for a Palm Beach County murder was in 1992, when Nollie Lee Martin was electrocuted. His crime was killing a college student working a summer job at a Delray Beach convenience store. Chamberlain, of West Palm Beach, will become the second man on Death Row for a Palm Beach County crime in the past 3 years to be resentenced to life in prison. In March 2005, Cleo LeCroy got a reprieve when the U.S. Supreme Court banned executions of people whose crimes were committed when they were under 18. The triple murders on Thanksgiving 1998 were set in motion when Thibault went to the house at 6507 Norton Ave. to sell cocaine to a woman, Amanda Ingman, who lived there with the victims. He was accompanied by Chamberlain and another man, Jason Dascott. They drove to the house in Chamberlain's father's car. Once there, Thibault, Chamberlain and Dascott decided to rob the home's residents of electronics. Thibault held 2 of them, Bryan Harrison, 21, and Daniel Ketchum, 27, at gunpoint in the bathroom while his cohorts stole items. Ketchum rushed him, and Thibault shot him dead in the ensuing struggle, according to court testimony and records. Ingman testified that Chamberlain said "no more witnesses" and urged Thibault to kill Harrison. Thibault claimed that he left the decision up to Ingman, whose boyfriend, Harrison, was one of the other 2 people in the house. She favored getting rid of them, he said. Ingman and Thibault then awakened Charlotte Kenyon, 26, sleeping in another room. They placed her in the bathroom with Harrison. Thibault later testified that he "emptied the gun" into Kenyon and Harrison with Chamberlain at his side. Harrison was still breathing, however, so Chamberlain went to the car and got more bullets. Once again Thibault began firing. The three victims were shot 10 times altogether. Thibault was convicted of 3 counts of 1st-degree murder and sentenced to death in 2001 by Circuit Judge Marvin Mounts. Chamberlain's trial was next. He was convicted of the same charges and also sentenced by Mounts to die. Dascott pleaded guilty to 2nd-degree murder and was sentenced to 10 years in prison. Ingman was never charged. Thibault was resentenced to life in September 2005 because nobody, including Mounts, had ever asked him if he waived his right to a jury during the sentencing phase of his case. That opened the door for Chamberlain to ask that his sentence also be modified. Today, Thibault is 32 and incarcerated at Glades Correctional Institution in Belle Glade. Dascott was released from prison last month, a day before his 29th birthday. He is living in the Florida Keys, where he is on probation for the next 5 years. (source: Palm Beach Post)
[Deathpenalty] death penalty news----TEXAS, CALIF., N.Y., N.J., FLA.
Rick Halperin Mon, 14 Apr 2008 22:42:18 -0500 (Central Daylight Time)